For true C++ Windows programming ONLY.

For true C++ Windows programming ONLY.

For true C++ Windows programming ONLY.

Get it here! Enjoy the reading.

Get it here! Enjoy the reading.

Get it here! Enjoy the reading.

C++ Report! Enjoy the reading.

It is interesting, I tested on a test machine with network disconnected. Next time you want to post such thing, you need to explain what it does, if you can't, attach a warning message that this is an uncheck code. Such code does carry a lots of risks. Good try anyway, thanks!

Aside from sourceforge.net, there are two link to open source C/C++ resources, both are good stuff: TLTOOLS Data Analysis Framework Enjoy programming C/C++! ;)

Aside from sourceforge.net, there are two link to open source C/C++ resources, both are good stuff: TLTOOLS Data Analysis Framework Enjoy programming C/C++! ;)

Check this out ;)[^]

I think you have absolutely no idea about WIN32 application development and deployment. MFC and WTL totally two different subject based on two DISTINCTIVELY different architect. Based on experienced using DUNDAS and ROGUEWAVE extended MFC, I can say MFC is still very strong. Native C++ remain strong in many area NOT only Windows. Microsoft should re-engineer MFC to better reflect the core of C++. Whether the new born MFC is based on class hierarchy or template is both fine to me. I just hope that native C/C++ development will continue as it is, instead of blending to some "un-manageable, incompatible" framework. :cool:

Very encouraging, see => http://www.cuj.com/documents/s%3D8890/cujexp0310sutter/ :cool:

Go to www.roguewave.com and see for yourself. A full grid control written in C#? Are you nuts or what, .nut includes so many grid nuts...why you need another nuts? Guess mixing C/C++ with .nut make you nuts huh? Relax! :rolleyes:

We converted some of our small-size projects to WTL previously. Now we are skeptical putting more effort on WTL, as Microsoft now seems don't even want to improve MFC/ATL beside keep pushing (implicitly forcing...) .nut for C/C++, which in our view, would eventually kill C/C++ on Windows. :mad: Anyone with any idea is WTL dead? :((

Agreed, too few update to MFC/ATL and the IDE now mix-up with .nut, which make C/C++ more complicated as before. :mad:

Use of SOAP 3 will save you a lot of time. Go MSDN and download the kit, look into the sample. String array can be a comma separated, Recordset, XML format. SAFEARRAY is in fact not more than a struct, why must you stuck with it? Be more creative in solving the problem. :)

WTL 7.1, anyone?

In case you didn't know this, here's a very good source of C++ template development website: http://synesis.com.au/stlsoft/ Please share it with your friends! :)