VB6 apps [modified]

Kevin McFarlane

cykophysh39 wrote:

I have bever really understood why everybody moans about it

Because lots of C/C++ developers are language bigots.

GaryWoodfine

Yeah, but when compared to the ease of developing quick business applications VB6 was King.

Kind Regards, Gary

GaryWoodfine

Yeah, I know. I don't see what the big hangup is about Programming languages!! So you know how to code in a Language!! Well to be a "real" programmer you need to know a whole heap of languages. I think the language bigots just need to grow up, and get over it :-)

Kind Regards, Gary

My Website || My Blog || My Articles

NormDroid

cykophysh39 wrote:

VB6 was King

I would hardly say 'King', but each to their own, I suppose.;)

We made the buttons on the screen look so good you'll want to lick them. Steve Jobs

NormDroid

cykophysh39 wrote:

I don't see what the big hangup is about Programming languages

You see you're missing the whole point, VB6 was a scripting language for users and not a programming language for developers.

We made the buttons on the screen look so good you'll want to lick them. Steve Jobs

Marc Clifton

My neighbor is a farmer and is in his 50's. He said something really interesting yesterday when I was talking to him. He said that for him, there's a lot of joy and pleasure and fun in farming, and he really feels that his mental attitude is partly what keeps him physically able to do the work. He feels that if farming stops being fun, his body will start falling apart because his mental attitude isn't positive anymore.

ChandraRam wrote:

on how those poor unfortunate souls

The moral of the story is, "poor and unfortunate" is a mental attitude, just as if you look instead at the joy of learning something new, moving forward, etc. Marc

Thyme In The Country
Interacx

People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh Smith

ChandraRam

cykophysh39 wrote:

Well to be a "real" programmer you need to know a whole heap of languages.

I should think you need to know how to program, period ;)

ChandraRam

Oh, but you misunderstood me... I was being sarcastic - due to the attitude that CPians generally have towards classic VB. I have (and still do) developed many apps using VB6... I really believe in using the tool best suited.

Kevin McFarlane

norm .net wrote:

it lets the less talented of users develop throw together bad applications

I've done and seen a lot of VB and a lot of C++ and there is no shortage of bad code in both. It's just down to the attitude of the developers.

Dan Neely

ChandraRam wrote:

What I was interested in was, what would (or should) the user of the app do to implement new requirements or fix things in the app, if all programmers were to migrate to a different language / platform, stating VB6 to be uncool?

Cobol's survived despite over a generation of mockery, VB will survive in the same "I hate it, but I hate unemployment worse" limbo.

-- Rules of thumb should not be taken for the whole hand.

NormDroid

Kevin McFarlane wrote:

attitude of the developers

I think you mean aptitude ;)

We made the buttons on the screen look so good you'll want to lick them. Steve Jobs

NormDroid

cykophysh39 wrote:

Well to be a "real" programmer you need to know a whole heap of languages.

You know that familiar saying "Jack of all trades..."

We made the buttons on the screen look so good you'll want to lick them. Steve Jobs

Marc Clifton

ChandraRam wrote:

was being sarcastic

Ah, well, I guess [sarcasm] tags would have been good. :)

ChandraRam wrote:

due to the attitude that CPians generally have towards classic VB.

Or VB in general. I'm definitely in the "I have an attitude" category, haha.

ChandraRam wrote:

I really believe in using the tool best suited.

If the customer is happy, that's pretty much 99.99% of all that counts. Marc

Thyme In The Country
Interacx

People are just notoriously impossible. --DavidCrow
There's NO excuse for not commenting your code. -- John Simmons / outlaw programmer
People who say that they will refactor their code later to make it "good" don't understand refactoring, nor the art and craft of programming. -- Josh Smith

GaryWoodfine

Yeah I think this thread could run into the danger of growing to be an ever expanding discussion on the Merits of VB6 and C++, an argument that has existed for years and years. And there are compelling arguments for both. And the "Purists" could lose months of sleep debating this subject to nTH degree. But in Reality, as a Developer, I have used VB6 To quickly churn out business applications to be used, in half the time it would have taken to write in VC++, and it was always easier to assemble a team of competent VB programmers than it was to get competent VC++ developers and often cheaper. Again we could discuss the merits of this to the nTH degree, but the fact is the business got their application, I got money for contract, and everybody's happy :-)

Kind Regards, Gary

My Website || My Blog || My Articles

GaryWoodfine

norm .net wrote:

You see you're missing the whole point, VB6 was a scripting language for users and not a programming language for developers.

Ok So you're a purist on the "Programming", so are you're saying we should just stuck to just writing binary or Assembler, that way just skip the whole intermediate compiler step :-)

Kind Regards, Gary

My Website || My Blog || My Articles

ChandraRam

Hear, hear! And this may be of interest - I have rewritten a C++ app to VB, due to bad (pathetic, actually) design / code, and because the customer wanted to maintain it themselves. So, as you say - depends on the programmer - bad is everywhere.

NormDroid

cykophysh39 wrote:

I got money for contract

But what did the customer really get, "A quickly churned out application" - this wouldn't fill the customers heart with hope ;) -- modified at 9:34 Thursday 15th February, 2007

We made the buttons on the screen look so good you'll want to lick them. Steve Jobs

NormDroid

cykophysh39 wrote:

Ok So you're a purist on the "Programming", so are you're saying we should just stuck to just writing binary or Assembler, that way just skip the whole intermediate compiler step

Nope you're so far off... Any I'm a C# bigot now, so lets leave it at that.

We made the buttons on the screen look so good you'll want to lick them. Steve Jobs

ChandraRam

cykophysh39 wrote: I have used VB6 To quickly churn out business applications to be used, in half the time it would have taken to write in VC++,

That was the complete sentence.... Seriously, do you think that the application would have been more stable or better just because it was written in VC++? Is it not actually enough to deliver on the clients requirements? I fully expect to be flamed for this statement :rolleyes:

GaryWoodfine

And I'm a "Will code in any language you desire for food" bigot :-)

Kind Regards, Gary

My Website || My Blog || My Articles