NEC offers official Vista downgrade product
-
I'm sure this[^] is making many UAC-enraged people feel a little better about life. Ouchie for Microsoft!
:josh: My WPF Blog[^] All of life is just a big rambling blog post.
-
I'm sure this[^] is making many UAC-enraged people feel a little better about life. Ouchie for Microsoft!
:josh: My WPF Blog[^] All of life is just a big rambling blog post.
ouchie for microsoft? "We do have some customers who are very happy with XP and see [no need] to move to Vista at the moment." well if they don't upgrade to vista...then i assume they would still retain the copies of windows XP and why would they need to dual boot if they have no need for vista?
----------------------------------------------------------- Completion Deadline: two days before the day after tomorrow
-
ouchie for microsoft? "We do have some customers who are very happy with XP and see [no need] to move to Vista at the moment." well if they don't upgrade to vista...then i assume they would still retain the copies of windows XP and why would they need to dual boot if they have no need for vista?
----------------------------------------------------------- Completion Deadline: two days before the day after tomorrow
jgasm wrote:
ouchie for microsoft?
After investing billions of dollars into creating a new operating system, I'm sure they don't like having companies create products that help people not use it. You can't have market churn without, well, churn.
:josh: My WPF Blog[^] All of life is just a big rambling blog post.
-
ouchie for microsoft? "We do have some customers who are very happy with XP and see [no need] to move to Vista at the moment." well if they don't upgrade to vista...then i assume they would still retain the copies of windows XP and why would they need to dual boot if they have no need for vista?
----------------------------------------------------------- Completion Deadline: two days before the day after tomorrow
jgasm wrote:
well if they don't upgrade to vista...then i assume they would still retain the copies of windows XP and why would they need to dual boot if they have no need for vista?
Otherwise intelligent people fear the computers for some reason. I'll never understand it.
A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects. - -Lazarus Long
-
I'm sure this[^] is making many UAC-enraged people feel a little better about life. Ouchie for Microsoft!
:josh: My WPF Blog[^] All of life is just a big rambling blog post.
-
jgasm wrote:
well if they don't upgrade to vista...then i assume they would still retain the copies of windows XP and why would they need to dual boot if they have no need for vista?
Otherwise intelligent people fear the computers for some reason. I'll never understand it.
A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects. - -Lazarus Long
Chris Austin wrote:
I'll never understand it.
That's exactly what those otherwise intelligent people think...which is why they fear the computers.
:josh: My WPF Blog[^] All of life is just a big rambling blog post.
-
jgasm wrote:
ouchie for microsoft?
After investing billions of dollars into creating a new operating system, I'm sure they don't like having companies create products that help people not use it. You can't have market churn without, well, churn.
:josh: My WPF Blog[^] All of life is just a big rambling blog post.
I guess you could look at it that way... OR It could mean that this company thinks the best way to operate is on the window's platform and wants to make sure people with dual boot needs can still retain those abilities. I think engadget is putting the "eff microsoft" spin on NEC 's actions.
----------------------------------------------------------- Completion Deadline: two days before the day after tomorrow
-
Chris Austin wrote:
I'll never understand it.
That's exactly what those otherwise intelligent people think...which is why they fear the computers.
:josh: My WPF Blog[^] All of life is just a big rambling blog post.
Reminds me on the thread on recursion a few days ago.
A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects. - -Lazarus Long
-
I guess you could look at it that way... OR It could mean that this company thinks the best way to operate is on the window's platform and wants to make sure people with dual boot needs can still retain those abilities. I think engadget is putting the "eff microsoft" spin on NEC 's actions.
----------------------------------------------------------- Completion Deadline: two days before the day after tomorrow
jgasm wrote:
I think engadget is putting the "eff microsoft" spin on NEC 's actions.
That could be the case...
:josh: My WPF Blog[^] All of life is just a big rambling blog post.
-
Reminds me on the thread on recursion a few days ago.
A human being should be able to change a diaper, plan an invasion, butcher a hog, conn a ship, design a building, write a sonnet, balance accounts, build a wall, set a bone, comfort the dying, take orders, give orders, cooperate, act alone, solve equations, analyze a new problem, pitch manure, program a computer, cook a tasty meal, fight efficiently, die gallantly. Specialization is for insects. - -Lazarus Long
Chris Austin wrote:
Reminds me on the thread on recursion a few days ago.
Have we entered into another Recursive Lounge Vortex!?!?! :omg: :~
:josh: My WPF Blog[^] All of life is just a big rambling blog post.
-
jgasm wrote:
ouchie for microsoft?
After investing billions of dollars into creating a new operating system, I'm sure they don't like having companies create products that help people not use it. You can't have market churn without, well, churn.
:josh: My WPF Blog[^] All of life is just a big rambling blog post.
If XP was a competitors product I think MS would be losing sleep.
-
If XP was a competitors product I think MS would be losing sleep.
martin_hughes wrote:
If XP was a competitors product I think MS would be losing sleep.
Based on my experience with companies roughly the size of Microsoft, each division is viewed as (and budgeted as) a separate business. Those businesses have debt to each other, create products for each other, poach talented employees from each other, etc. I wouldn't be surprised to find out that the folks at the "Vista company" are eager to bury the "XP company." Sure, at the end of the day, the Microsoft parent company profits from them all. However, I don't think that applying the name Microsoft as a blanket accurately captures their enormously complex organizational/accounting/political systems. My point is, MS does and does not want XP to live.
:josh: My WPF Blog[^] All of life is just a big rambling blog post.
-
martin_hughes wrote:
If XP was a competitors product I think MS would be losing sleep.
Based on my experience with companies roughly the size of Microsoft, each division is viewed as (and budgeted as) a separate business. Those businesses have debt to each other, create products for each other, poach talented employees from each other, etc. I wouldn't be surprised to find out that the folks at the "Vista company" are eager to bury the "XP company." Sure, at the end of the day, the Microsoft parent company profits from them all. However, I don't think that applying the name Microsoft as a blanket accurately captures their enormously complex organizational/accounting/political systems. My point is, MS does and does not want XP to live.
:josh: My WPF Blog[^] All of life is just a big rambling blog post.
That's quite true. It does seem odd to me, however, that those who despise Vista and rail against Microsoft to its core revert to XP instead of jumping on the Linux band wagon.
-
I'm sure this[^] is making many UAC-enraged people feel a little better about life. Ouchie for Microsoft!
:josh: My WPF Blog[^] All of life is just a big rambling blog post.
The Windows Vista Business and Ultimate Edition licences include downgrade rights to downgrade to XP Pro. You do have to have OEM XP media (for the correct OEM, in the case of the top OEMs, I think). That's what this £7 kit is. There's very little wrong with XP and if the problem is that people don't want something new, it's the right thing to supply. Windows Vista's biggest competitor was always going to be its predecessor. Microsoft should really be happy as long as they're still getting paid, but they want to start phasing out support for the old product. I suppose the theory is that the newer product should be cheaper to support but I don't think it's going to work out like that. I heard a rumour that Microsoft support engineers' new computers are now coming with XP installed rather than Vista, after they were all previously migrated to the new OS.
DoEvents: Generating unexpected recursion since 1991
-
That's quite true. It does seem odd to me, however, that those who despise Vista and rail against Microsoft to its core revert to XP instead of jumping on the Linux band wagon.
martin_hughes wrote:
instead of jumping on the Linux band wagon.
Because jumping on the Linux band wagon quickly leads you down a Vail of Tears to such a degree that you begin to pine for Windows 3.1 and Visual C++ 1.5. Any group that still has near religious discussions about whether or not to *distribute* proprietary vendor drivers*, or even plug-ins for proprietary formats, has it's collective head deeply and permanently buried up it's collective rectum. Yes, those little chunks of code that make you uber cool NVidia graphics actually usuable for X-Winblows, as opposed to resorting to all sorts of software emulation.
¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! Real Mentats use only 100% pure, unfooled around with Sapho Juice(tm)! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! VCF Blog
-
Chris Austin wrote:
Reminds me on the thread on recursion a few days ago.
Have we entered into another Recursive Lounge Vortex!?!?! :omg: :~
:josh: My WPF Blog[^] All of life is just a big rambling blog post.
Wait... I Don't Understand It!!!
¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! Real Mentats use only 100% pure, unfooled around with Sapho Juice(tm)! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! VCF Blog
-
I'm sure this[^] is making many UAC-enraged people feel a little better about life. Ouchie for Microsoft!
:josh: My WPF Blog[^] All of life is just a big rambling blog post.
Now all I need is someone to offer a WPF to WinForms to MFC downgrade. ;P
You have, what I would term, a very formal turn of phrase not seen in these isles since the old King passed from this world to the next. martin_hughes on VDK
-
Now all I need is someone to offer a WPF to WinForms to MFC downgrade. ;P
You have, what I would term, a very formal turn of phrase not seen in these isles since the old King passed from this world to the next. martin_hughes on VDK
Rama Krishna Vavilala wrote:
Now all I need is someone to offer a WPF to WinForms to MFC downgrade.
Sounds like a product that some Loungenites would be more than willing to proffer. Outlaw JS, you down?
:josh: My WPF Blog[^] All of life is just a big rambling blog post.
-
martin_hughes wrote:
instead of jumping on the Linux band wagon.
Because jumping on the Linux band wagon quickly leads you down a Vail of Tears to such a degree that you begin to pine for Windows 3.1 and Visual C++ 1.5. Any group that still has near religious discussions about whether or not to *distribute* proprietary vendor drivers*, or even plug-ins for proprietary formats, has it's collective head deeply and permanently buried up it's collective rectum. Yes, those little chunks of code that make you uber cool NVidia graphics actually usuable for X-Winblows, as opposed to resorting to all sorts of software emulation.
¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! Real Mentats use only 100% pure, unfooled around with Sapho Juice(tm)! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! VCF Blog
Hail Satan...I mean, da comrade! The Linux bandwagon ist fur mich!
:josh: My WPF Blog[^] All of life is just a big rambling blog post.
-
ouchie for microsoft? "We do have some customers who are very happy with XP and see [no need] to move to Vista at the moment." well if they don't upgrade to vista...then i assume they would still retain the copies of windows XP and why would they need to dual boot if they have no need for vista?
----------------------------------------------------------- Completion Deadline: two days before the day after tomorrow
Maybe this would actually boost Vista sales, as people who are afraid to move to Vista could still keep XP while experimenting Vista. Maybe that is why the "[no need]" was quoted. It is just like me, I have [no need] to move to to Vista, but sometimes I miss when I had one, it just looks so pretty (Yet I hate it, very annoying to work with, and has the performance issues).