Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Irony.NET

Irony.NET

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csharpcomquestiondiscussion
26 Posts 20 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Dan Neely

    Nantucket.net Is the best thing yet When you code in Nantucket While Sitting on a bucket Because you lost a bet

    Otherwise [Microsoft is] toast in the long term no matter how much money they've got. They would be already if the Linux community didn't have it's head so firmly up it's own command line buffer that it looks like taking 15 years to find the desktop. -- Matthew Faithfull

    E Offline
    E Offline
    El Corazon
    wrote on last edited by
    #12

    dan neely wrote:

    Nantucket.net

    There was a lady from nantucket dot net .... just not the same....

    _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

    P 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • P Paul Conrad

      How about Platinumy.NET :-\

      "I guess it's what separates the professionals from the drag and drop, girly wirly, namby pamby, wishy washy, can't code for crap types." - Pete O'Hanlon

      Richard Andrew x64R Offline
      Richard Andrew x64R Offline
      Richard Andrew x64
      wrote on last edited by
      #13

      WithoutA.NET

      “Cannot find REALITY.SYS...Universe Halted.” ~ God on phone with Microsoft Customer Support

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M martin_hughes

        No, not Pete's newest invention (that's Sarcasm.NET, which supersedes CausticRetort.NET), but Irony.NET[^] has anybody used it? If so, what do you think?

        P Offline
        P Offline
        Pete OHanlon
        wrote on last edited by
        #14

        I'm still working on DragNet; and that's not the show put on by the Ladyboys of Bangkok.

        Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

        My blog | My articles

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • E El Corazon

          dan neely wrote:

          Nantucket.net

          There was a lady from nantucket dot net .... just not the same....

          _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

          P Offline
          P Offline
          Paul Conrad
          wrote on last edited by
          #15

          El Corazon wrote:

          There was a lady from nantucket dot net

          Okay, there is a certain poem about her, but I don't know if it is even Soapbox-friendly :-\

          "I guess it's what separates the professionals from the drag and drop, girly wirly, namby pamby, wishy washy, can't code for crap types." - Pete O'Hanlon

          E 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • P Paul Conrad

            El Corazon wrote:

            There was a lady from nantucket dot net

            Okay, there is a certain poem about her, but I don't know if it is even Soapbox-friendly :-\

            "I guess it's what separates the professionals from the drag and drop, girly wirly, namby pamby, wishy washy, can't code for crap types." - Pete O'Hanlon

            E Offline
            E Offline
            El Corazon
            wrote on last edited by
            #16

            Paul Conrad wrote:

            Okay, there is a certain poem about her, but I don't know if it is even Soapbox-friendly

            if we know the same poetry, it isn't. ;P

            _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

            P 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • E El Corazon

              Paul Conrad wrote:

              Okay, there is a certain poem about her, but I don't know if it is even Soapbox-friendly

              if we know the same poetry, it isn't. ;P

              _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

              P Offline
              P Offline
              Paul Conrad
              wrote on last edited by
              #17

              :laugh:

              "I guess it's what separates the professionals from the drag and drop, girly wirly, namby pamby, wishy washy, can't code for crap types." - Pete O'Hanlon

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M martin_hughes

                No, not Pete's newest invention (that's Sarcasm.NET, which supersedes CausticRetort.NET), but Irony.NET[^] has anybody used it? If so, what do you think?

                S Offline
                S Offline
                Super Lloyd
                wrote on last edited by
                #18

                I mostly used ANTLR. At a first glance it seems easier to me to design huge grammar with ANTLR than it is with Irony. But it looks like it's worth a try....

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • J Jim Crafton

                  He lost me at: "Unlike most existing yacc/lex-style solutions Irony does not employ any scanner or parser code generation from grammar specifications written in proprietary meta-language. " What?!? Since when is the BNF/EBNF form used by yacc/lex and variants "proprietary"? What he's describing smells a lot like Spirit[^] And finally it's a stupid name. "Irony"? Please, puhhhlease give your project some meaningful name, not just random nouns/verbs/adjectives etc. Gahhh! So once I can get past all that, I guess I might be interested in it, I suppose.

                  ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! Real Mentats use only 100% pure, unfooled around with Sapho Juice(tm)! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! VCF Blog

                  B Offline
                  B Offline
                  Brady Kelly
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #19

                  Jim Crafton wrote:

                  Please, puhhhlease give your project some meaningful name,

                  NACC? Dex?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J Jim Crafton

                    He lost me at: "Unlike most existing yacc/lex-style solutions Irony does not employ any scanner or parser code generation from grammar specifications written in proprietary meta-language. " What?!? Since when is the BNF/EBNF form used by yacc/lex and variants "proprietary"? What he's describing smells a lot like Spirit[^] And finally it's a stupid name. "Irony"? Please, puhhhlease give your project some meaningful name, not just random nouns/verbs/adjectives etc. Gahhh! So once I can get past all that, I guess I might be interested in it, I suppose.

                    ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! Real Mentats use only 100% pure, unfooled around with Sapho Juice(tm)! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! VCF Blog

                    J Offline
                    J Offline
                    James Curran
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #20

                    "Irony" comes from "IronPython" & "IronRuby" (Microsoft .Net implementations of Python & Ruby). The mime has carried over to IronScheme, IronLisp and IronLogo among others. Hence "Irony" is for building "Iron*" languages.

                    Truth, James

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R realJSOP

                      Is there an aluminumy.net, or a steely.net?

                      "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
                      -----
                      "...the staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - Jason Jystad, 10/26/2001

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Lilith C
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #21

                      John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

                      Is there an aluminumy.net, or a steely.net?

                      Not.YET .

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • J Jim Crafton

                        He lost me at: "Unlike most existing yacc/lex-style solutions Irony does not employ any scanner or parser code generation from grammar specifications written in proprietary meta-language. " What?!? Since when is the BNF/EBNF form used by yacc/lex and variants "proprietary"? What he's describing smells a lot like Spirit[^] And finally it's a stupid name. "Irony"? Please, puhhhlease give your project some meaningful name, not just random nouns/verbs/adjectives etc. Gahhh! So once I can get past all that, I guess I might be interested in it, I suppose.

                        ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! Real Mentats use only 100% pure, unfooled around with Sapho Juice(tm)! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! VCF Blog

                        S Offline
                        S Offline
                        Sarsipius
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #22

                        Jim Crafton wrote:

                        He lost me at: "Unlike most existing yacc/lex-style solutions Irony does not employ any scanner or parser code generation from grammar specifications written in proprietary meta-language. " What?!? Since when is the BNF/EBNF form used by yacc/lex and variants "proprietary"?

                        Allow me to translate for you: "We find it too difficult to parse BNF into C#, so rather than generate the code for you, you have to do it yourself." That's where the Irony comes in. They built a parser, but can't parse BNF themselves.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • M martin_hughes

                          No, not Pete's newest invention (that's Sarcasm.NET, which supersedes CausticRetort.NET), but Irony.NET[^] has anybody used it? If so, what do you think?

                          N Offline
                          N Offline
                          NimitySSJ
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #23

                          It seems like a modern version of Spirit, the Boost library's C++ compiler builder. It used overloading and templates to allow you to write code that looked a lot like a standard grammar. There were classes or objects available to control the parsing. So, at first glance, the opening paragraph makes me think this is Spirit#. I still think GoldBuilder is one of the best language definers, as all I have to write is an LALR engine supporting the file format.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Maximilien

                            What next ? Ironing.NET ? Your code is as flat as possible.

                            Maximilien Lincourt Your Head A Splode - Strong Bad

                            U Offline
                            U Offline
                            urbane tiger
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #24

                            I like Krypto.Net - especially good at hiding information, and the bugs :)

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M martin_hughes

                              No, not Pete's newest invention (that's Sarcasm.NET, which supersedes CausticRetort.NET), but Irony.NET[^] has anybody used it? If so, what do you think?

                              D Offline
                              D Offline
                              Daniel Flower
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #25

                              I'm currently writing a (GW) BASIC-to-JavaScript compiler using Irony.NET (CodeProject article coming soon). I think Irony.NET is a brilliant project as it allows you to write an interpreter without really needing to do any scanner/parsing implementation, and just having everything in .NET code makes it seem so much more convenient than using, say, LEX or something. It's a little scant on documentation though.

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • J Jim Crafton

                                He lost me at: "Unlike most existing yacc/lex-style solutions Irony does not employ any scanner or parser code generation from grammar specifications written in proprietary meta-language. " What?!? Since when is the BNF/EBNF form used by yacc/lex and variants "proprietary"? What he's describing smells a lot like Spirit[^] And finally it's a stupid name. "Irony"? Please, puhhhlease give your project some meaningful name, not just random nouns/verbs/adjectives etc. Gahhh! So once I can get past all that, I guess I might be interested in it, I suppose.

                                ¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! Real Mentats use only 100% pure, unfooled around with Sapho Juice(tm)! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! VCF Blog

                                D Offline
                                D Offline
                                dmitri_sps
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #26

                                They changed the word "proprietary" to "specialized" on the day you posted the critics. Now it is even more grand: looks like Irony.NET introduces a new non-"Specialized" grammar meta-language. I think what happends is that the guys write a tool for certain code generation, like many people do for various reasons. They publish its source - it's a useful tool, and some people may like it. But it's not enough: they want to place some foundation, add some claim for theoretical break-through. And in doing so, they fully adopt Microsoft approach: claim it's open standard, universal, generic, etc. In reality, 1) it is .NET specific - would you want to write a Java parser for what they call an "expression grammar"??? 2) it is not documented - they have samples, but what is a grammar of their grammar? Will it start with "using System;" literal ?? So... do not take it serious. It's just another tool.

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                Reply
                                • Reply as topic
                                Log in to reply
                                • Oldest to Newest
                                • Newest to Oldest
                                • Most Votes


                                • Login

                                • Don't have an account? Register

                                • Login or register to search.
                                • First post
                                  Last post
                                0
                                • Categories
                                • Recent
                                • Tags
                                • Popular
                                • World
                                • Users
                                • Groups