Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Developers Blues

Developers Blues

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
graphicsadobelinuxquestion
27 Posts 10 Posters 41 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Rob Graham

    TheArchitectualizer wrote:

    f 'Let the compiler sort it out'.

    So you've discovered a compiler with working intention prediction? There is no excuse for writing ambiguous code. Maintainers should be permitted to poke the original author of crap like this with sharp sticks. In a month you wont remember what it was that you really meant. What happens when the vendor decides the compiler implementation was non-standard/wrong and changes how this compiles in a new version?

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #18

    I read study the language specification first all the way down to the op code and JIT. I don't write code the specification doesn't impliment.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L Lost User

      Awww! My eyes! My eyes! My brain! I'm meeeeltiiiiing... Too much geekyness? :-D When you write a poem about something (or even copy-paste it from somewhere else), you just gotta know you're a fanatic of the subject in the poem, which in this case is also called "a geek". Ever played Portal, BTW? At the end there's a really neat song about a geeky female computer that does science and experiments on people. Your poem sort of reminded me of that. C'mon! Don't tell me you don't know what I'm talking about. :laugh: Another thought: maybe you should stick to poetry. :doh: (byte)a = b << 8; sort of makes sense for me, in case you wanted a quick way to divide b by 2^8, and if b were not a char, OR if you wanted to get bits 7-15 of an x-bit variable, where x is a power of 2 greater than 16. Sorry to say this, but you're just a geek on this one. (i.e., as advertised on TV)

      modified on Monday, July 6, 2009 10:01 AM

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #19

      Hmm, what is 'a' and 'b'? My point, bit shifting is not an everyday OO operation in C#. If you need fast code, use C or ASM.

      E L 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • P PIEBALDconsult

        Other than the ability to briefly explain an "incorrect" answer, I had no opportunity to discuss the problems with the test with the recruiter.

        M Offline
        M Offline
        Member 1709723
        wrote on last edited by
        #20

        yeah, right, like that would have made a difference most i know would be like talking to a rock- i said most! not all - i do know a handful of decent ones

        icalburner

        L 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Member 1709723

          yeah, right, like that would have made a difference most i know would be like talking to a rock- i said most! not all - i do know a handful of decent ones

          icalburner

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #21

          Haha! :laugh: My college optics professor told us one day: 'I can teach optics to a rock...' He is a master at realy dry humor. It's not logical, stack overflow!

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • L Lost User

            Hmm, what is 'a' and 'b'? My point, bit shifting is not an everyday OO operation in C#. If you need fast code, use C or ASM.

            E Offline
            E Offline
            Eric J
            wrote on last edited by
            #22

            It must be nice to only work with highly abstracted data types. You clearly don't do any bit bashing, unlike many of us (it is not restricted to low-level programming). I do it fairly often in my code, so maybe I'm doing something wrong.

            L 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • E Eric J

              It must be nice to only work with highly abstracted data types. You clearly don't do any bit bashing, unlike many of us (it is not restricted to low-level programming). I do it fairly often in my code, so maybe I'm doing something wrong.

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Lost User
              wrote on last edited by
              #23

              Donno! :confused: Mostly write bus apps. Can't do anything interesting there. In my free time, which I have lots of these days, I research what I consider low level stuff. Most primitave code I worked on was some geo spatial stuff, but I used Lab View Math Lab and other mathematical packages...

              modified on Monday, July 6, 2009 3:50 PM

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L Lost User

                Just to prove the point I took the free C# BB test. Test: C# Date: 05-Jul-2009 Score: 2.56 Weights: 100% C# Elapsed time: 27 min 40 sec C# Score: 2.56 Percentile: Scored higher than 27% of previous examinees Demonstrates a solid understanding of core concepts within this topic. Appears capable of working on most projects in this area with moderate assistance. May require some initial assistance with advanced concepts, however. Strong Areas Value and Reference Types Weak Areas Grammar Developing Data Consumers and Services Methods Properties, Indexers, and Fields I failed! Min passing 2.76. Here are some of the tings I'm talking about: if (a > b) c = 'a'; else { if (b == d) c = 'e'; else c = 'b'; } a) c = (b = d) ? 'e' : ((a > b) ? 'a' : 'b'); b) c = (b == d) ? 'e' : (a > b) ? 'a' : 'b'; c) c = (a > b) ? 'a' : (b = d) ? 'e' : 'b'; d) c = (a > b) ? 'a' : (b == d) ? 'e' : 'b'; e) c = (a > b) ? 'a' : ((b = d) ? 'e' : 'b'); ...and... public void A() { byte a, b, c; a = 255; b = 122; c = (byte)(a & b); } ...and... 'Which one of the following compilers' flag turns on run-time integer range checking? '

                J Offline
                J Offline
                Jonas Hammarberg
                wrote on last edited by
                #24

                While I was hanging out at getafreelancer.com these gigs "Create a automatic test for subject such and such" frequently turned up... Lowest bider was _always_ selected -- which maybe could explain the (sub)quality of these tests... Cheers /Jonas

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  Hmm, what is 'a' and 'b'? My point, bit shifting is not an everyday OO operation in C#. If you need fast code, use C or ASM.

                  L Offline
                  L Offline
                  Lost User
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #25

                  TheArchitectualizer wrote:

                  Hmm, what is 'a' and 'b'?

                  ; I'll need more of the code to figure that out. However, I can tell you that if b is not declared as something larger than char, then all this code does is put 0 in a. :|

                  TheArchitectualizer wrote:

                  If you need fast code, use C or ASM.

                  I do. :P

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • L Lost User

                    Just to prove the point I took the free C# BB test. Test: C# Date: 05-Jul-2009 Score: 2.56 Weights: 100% C# Elapsed time: 27 min 40 sec C# Score: 2.56 Percentile: Scored higher than 27% of previous examinees Demonstrates a solid understanding of core concepts within this topic. Appears capable of working on most projects in this area with moderate assistance. May require some initial assistance with advanced concepts, however. Strong Areas Value and Reference Types Weak Areas Grammar Developing Data Consumers and Services Methods Properties, Indexers, and Fields I failed! Min passing 2.76. Here are some of the tings I'm talking about: if (a > b) c = 'a'; else { if (b == d) c = 'e'; else c = 'b'; } a) c = (b = d) ? 'e' : ((a > b) ? 'a' : 'b'); b) c = (b == d) ? 'e' : (a > b) ? 'a' : 'b'; c) c = (a > b) ? 'a' : (b = d) ? 'e' : 'b'; d) c = (a > b) ? 'a' : (b == d) ? 'e' : 'b'; e) c = (a > b) ? 'a' : ((b = d) ? 'e' : 'b'); ...and... public void A() { byte a, b, c; a = 255; b = 122; c = (byte)(a & b); } ...and... 'Which one of the following compilers' flag turns on run-time integer range checking? '

                    E Offline
                    E Offline
                    E Anderson
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #26

                    TheArchitectualizer wrote:

                    Just to prove the point I took the free C# BB test.

                    Y'all have me curious - what is the link to that site? Are you referring to the C# test available at Brainbench or some other site?

                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • E E Anderson

                      TheArchitectualizer wrote:

                      Just to prove the point I took the free C# BB test.

                      Y'all have me curious - what is the link to that site? Are you referring to the C# test available at Brainbench or some other site?

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Lost User
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #27

                      Yup!

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups