Programming's Foul Language
-
Throws, as in the Java notation :thumbsdown:
If the post was helpful, please vote, eh! Current activities: Book: Devils by Fyodor Dostoyevsky Project: Hospital Automation, final stage Learning: Image analysis, LINQ Now and forever, defiant to the end. What is Multiple Sclerosis[^]?
Kidding ? :omg: Coding without it is like using FORTRAN: do not catch anything, or enclose all code in try/catch, just in case ;P
-
What programming terms would you consider equivalent to foul language? For example: Legacy Code
Todd Smith
Java, COM, COM+, Interpreted languages, SOA
-
IUnkown was fine - it was IQueryInterface that introduced all the problems. ;P
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith
As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
QueryInterface() was a part of IUnknown... ;P
-- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit
-
SIGSEGVSIGBUS wasn't so hot either.
-- Kein Mitleid Für Die Mehrheit
-
What programming terms would you consider equivalent to foul language? For example: Legacy Code
Todd Smith
StartDate nvarchar(20) default '' -
Actually, I'd rather like the
withstatement as well."WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith
As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
I got over that very quickly and now can't figure why people miss it. Just use a short named local.
-
Parts of it - you can't do method invocation with it.
"WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith
As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.
You can use an initialiser for your Nodes collection as well.
-
Extension Method.
Are you mad Sir?
-
I mean - it's a pretty awful thing to wish upon a developer...
cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP
I like writing documents. :)
-
Are you mad Sir?
(There was supposed to be some sexual connotation in there. :~ ) But I do dislike the prolific use of the things.
-
What programming terms would you consider equivalent to foul language? For example: Legacy Code
Todd Smith
-
Drop the semi-colon? And be forced _ to resort to VB's _ horrible style of _ line continuations!?!? No thanks. Though the case sensitivity... I wouldn't have to deal with code where people name the private variables the same as the exposed properties, with just case differences... Or better yet, gems like:
int num = Num + NUM;
Thankfully, I've never actually seen a line that bad, but imagine a program written like that... There's something you can't do in VB.
Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Developer, Author (Guardians of Xen)
You so could write it like that in VB. But it would be tantamount to
num *= 2err I meannum = num * 2Curses to VB and it's lack of shorthand arithmetic operators!
Ninja (the Nerd)
Confused? You will be... -
What programming terms would you consider equivalent to foul language? For example: Legacy Code
Todd Smith
-
(There was supposed to be some sexual connotation in there. :~ ) But I do dislike the prolific use of the things.
Prolific maybe, but between them and partial classes, I get quite extended.
-
What programming terms would you consider equivalent to foul language? For example: Legacy Code
Todd Smith
Showing my age here: - anything in setjmp.h - ie setjmp, longjmp, etc basically a goto on steroids! - VARIANT_BOOL .... why oh why is VARIANT_TRUE -1 not 1 which is what TRUE is defined as, source of much pain in the past - oh and anything COM related actually! - MFC (need I say more...)
-
You so could write it like that in VB. But it would be tantamount to
num *= 2err I meannum = num * 2Curses to VB and it's lack of shorthand arithmetic operators!
Ninja (the Nerd)
Confused? You will be...If you actually bothered to check, VB.Net HAS had that shorthand since .Net 1.1. Check your facts mate! And he was talking about the case sensitivity in C# (my main gripe with it): so that
num <> Num <> NUM, so thatnum = Num + NUMis NOTnum *= 2 -
If you actually bothered to check, VB.Net HAS had that shorthand since .Net 1.1. Check your facts mate! And he was talking about the case sensitivity in C# (my main gripe with it): so that
num <> Num <> NUM, so thatnum = Num + NUMis NOTnum *= 2I could've sworn it didn't have it when I used it in .NET 2, odd.. And I meant VB when I said
num *= 2. I was trying to highlight my gripe with my last (apparently inaccurate) experience of VB, how it lacks in things I like using. Sorry if that wasn't clear. Edit: definitely my bad. I had somehow confused *= with ++. I tried writing some VB about 5 minutes ago and automatically put ; at the end of every line. :doh:
Ninja (the Nerd)
Confused? You will be...modified on Wednesday, August 19, 2009 6:23 AM
-
What programming terms would you consider equivalent to foul language? For example: Legacy Code
Todd Smith
"Specification." best, Bill
"Many : not conversant with mathematical studies, imagine that because it [the Analytical Engine] is to give results in numerical notation, its processes must consequently be arithmetical, numerical, rather than algebraical and analytical. This is an error. The engine can arrange and combine numerical quantities as if they were letters or any other general symbols; and it fact it might bring out its results in algebraical notation, were provisions made accordingly." Ada, Countess Lovelace, 1844
-
What programming terms would you consider equivalent to foul language? For example: Legacy Code
Todd Smith
-
What programming terms would you consider equivalent to foul language? For example: Legacy Code
Todd Smith
Todd Smith wrote:
What programming terms would you consider equivalent to foul language? For example:
Code without comments. I think it's synonymous with talking at you, rather than with you. Rude. Leaving compiler warnings in a build. Which speaks so much about the character of the programmer. Lazy, like koalas. Luc