Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Programming's Foul Language

Programming's Foul Language

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
tutorialquestion
111 Posts 61 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • P Pete OHanlon

    Actually, I'd rather like the with statement as well.

    "WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith

    As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.

    My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx

    B Offline
    B Offline
    Brady Kelly
    wrote on last edited by
    #55

    I got over that very quickly and now can't figure why people miss it. Just use a short named local.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • P Pete OHanlon

      Parts of it - you can't do method invocation with it.

      "WPF has many lovers. It's a veritable porn star!" - Josh Smith

      As Braveheart once said, "You can take our freedom but you'll never take our Hobnobs!" - Martin Hughes.

      My blog | My articles | MoXAML PowerToys | Onyx

      B Offline
      B Offline
      Brady Kelly
      wrote on last edited by
      #56

      You can use an initialiser for your Nodes collection as well.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • P PIEBALDconsult

        Extension Method.

        B Offline
        B Offline
        Brady Kelly
        wrote on last edited by
        #57

        Are you mad Sir?

        P 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C Chris Maunder

          I mean - it's a pretty awful thing to wish upon a developer...

          cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP

          B Offline
          B Offline
          Brady Kelly
          wrote on last edited by
          #58

          I like writing documents. :)

          D D 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • B Brady Kelly

            Are you mad Sir?

            P Offline
            P Offline
            PIEBALDconsult
            wrote on last edited by
            #59

            (There was supposed to be some sexual connotation in there. :~ ) But I do dislike the prolific use of the things.

            B 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • T Todd Smith

              What programming terms would you consider equivalent to foul language? For example: Legacy Code

              Todd Smith

              D Offline
              D Offline
              dazfuller
              wrote on last edited by
              #60

              Anything where there is a comment reading something like

              // This is a temporary fix, remove as soon as possible

              But it's still in there 3 years later!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • I Ian Shlasko

                Drop the semi-colon? And be forced _ to resort to VB's _ horrible style of _ line continuations!?!? No thanks. Though the case sensitivity... I wouldn't have to deal with code where people name the private variables the same as the exposed properties, with just case differences... Or better yet, gems like:

                int num = Num + NUM;

                Thankfully, I've never actually seen a line that bad, but imagine a program written like that... There's something you can't do in VB.

                Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Developer, Author (Guardians of Xen)

                C Offline
                C Offline
                codemunkeh
                wrote on last edited by
                #61

                You so could write it like that in VB. But it would be tantamount to num *= 2 err I mean num = num * 2 Curses to VB and it's lack of shorthand arithmetic operators!


                Ninja (the Nerd)
                Confused? You will be...

                D 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • T Todd Smith

                  What programming terms would you consider equivalent to foul language? For example: Legacy Code

                  Todd Smith

                  R Offline
                  R Offline
                  reshi999
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #62

                  Interoperability

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • P PIEBALDconsult

                    (There was supposed to be some sexual connotation in there. :~ ) But I do dislike the prolific use of the things.

                    B Offline
                    B Offline
                    Brady Kelly
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #63

                    Prolific maybe, but between them and partial classes, I get quite extended.

                    P 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • T Todd Smith

                      What programming terms would you consider equivalent to foul language? For example: Legacy Code

                      Todd Smith

                      I Offline
                      I Offline
                      ian__lindsay 0
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #64

                      Showing my age here: - anything in setjmp.h - ie setjmp, longjmp, etc basically a goto on steroids! - VARIANT_BOOL .... why oh why is VARIANT_TRUE -1 not 1 which is what TRUE is defined as, source of much pain in the past - oh and anything COM related actually! - MFC (need I say more...)

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • C codemunkeh

                        You so could write it like that in VB. But it would be tantamount to num *= 2 err I mean num = num * 2 Curses to VB and it's lack of shorthand arithmetic operators!


                        Ninja (the Nerd)
                        Confused? You will be...

                        D Offline
                        D Offline
                        dawmail333
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #65

                        If you actually bothered to check, VB.Net HAS had that shorthand since .Net 1.1. Check your facts mate! And he was talking about the case sensitivity in C# (my main gripe with it): so that num <> Num <> NUM, so that num = Num + NUM is NOT num *= 2

                        C 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • D dawmail333

                          If you actually bothered to check, VB.Net HAS had that shorthand since .Net 1.1. Check your facts mate! And he was talking about the case sensitivity in C# (my main gripe with it): so that num <> Num <> NUM, so that num = Num + NUM is NOT num *= 2

                          C Offline
                          C Offline
                          codemunkeh
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #66

                          I could've sworn it didn't have it when I used it in .NET 2, odd.. And I meant VB when I said num *= 2. I was trying to highlight my gripe with my last (apparently inaccurate) experience of VB, how it lacks in things I like using. Sorry if that wasn't clear. Edit: definitely my bad. I had somehow confused *= with ++. I tried writing some VB about 5 minutes ago and automatically put ; at the end of every line. :doh:


                          Ninja (the Nerd)
                          Confused? You will be...

                          modified on Wednesday, August 19, 2009 6:23 AM

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • T Todd Smith

                            What programming terms would you consider equivalent to foul language? For example: Legacy Code

                            Todd Smith

                            B Offline
                            B Offline
                            BillWoodruff
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #67

                            "Specification." best, Bill

                            "Many : not conversant with mathematical studies, imagine that because it [the Analytical Engine] is to give results in numerical notation, its processes must consequently be arithmetical, numerical, rather than algebraical and analytical. This is an error. The engine can arrange and combine numerical quantities as if they were letters or any other general symbols; and it fact it might bring out its results in algebraical notation, were provisions made accordingly." Ada, Countess Lovelace, 1844

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • T Todd Smith

                              What programming terms would you consider equivalent to foul language? For example: Legacy Code

                              Todd Smith

                              C Offline
                              C Offline
                              CodeGimp
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #68

                              Maximisation of ROI through n-tier component technology throughout the distributed heterogenous client-server environment

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • T Todd Smith

                                What programming terms would you consider equivalent to foul language? For example: Legacy Code

                                Todd Smith

                                L Offline
                                L Offline
                                Lucien0
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #69

                                Todd Smith wrote:

                                What programming terms would you consider equivalent to foul language? For example:

                                Code without comments. I think it's synonymous with talking at you, rather than with you. Rude. Leaving compiler warnings in a build. Which speaks so much about the character of the programmer. Lazy, like koalas. Luc

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • I Ian Shlasko

                                  Drop the semi-colon? And be forced _ to resort to VB's _ horrible style of _ line continuations!?!? No thanks. Though the case sensitivity... I wouldn't have to deal with code where people name the private variables the same as the exposed properties, with just case differences... Or better yet, gems like:

                                  int num = Num + NUM;

                                  Thankfully, I've never actually seen a line that bad, but imagine a program written like that... There's something you can't do in VB.

                                  Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Developer, Author (Guardians of Xen)

                                  S Offline
                                  S Offline
                                  Seth Rowe
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #70

                                  Ian Shlasko wrote:

                                  Drop the semi-colon? And be forced _ to resort to VB's _ horrible style of _ line continuations!?!?

                                  Of course with the release of Visual Studio 2010, VB will be getting implicit line continuation for most areas :-) Thanks, Seth Rowe [MVP]

                                  D 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • V Vikram A Punathambekar

                                    Really? I loved checked exceptions when I was programming in Java. I have the backing of at least one more highly-respected CPian. :)

                                    Cheers, Vikram. (Proud to have finally cracked a CCC!)

                                    D Offline
                                    D Offline
                                    Daniel Vaughan
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #71

                                    Me too. When they are used properly.

                                    Daniel Vaughan Blog: DanielVaughan.Orpius.com

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • J jeron1

                                      goto X|

                                      F Offline
                                      F Offline
                                      Fabio Franco
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #72

                                      I agree with that, despite knowing that at Assembly level, that's exactly what your code will do.

                                      J 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M Mustafa Ismail Mustafa

                                        Throws, as in the Java notation :thumbsdown:

                                        If the post was helpful, please vote, eh! Current activities: Book: Devils by Fyodor Dostoyevsky Project: Hospital Automation, final stage Learning: Image analysis, LINQ Now and forever, defiant to the end. What is Multiple Sclerosis[^]?

                                        F Offline
                                        F Offline
                                        Fabio Franco
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #73

                                        This is the only thing about JAVA that I miss wish to be in C#. This is very useful when you're using other people's libraries. You get know what to catch, without needing a very well documented library.

                                        D C 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • F Fabio Franco

                                          This is the only thing about JAVA that I miss wish to be in C#. This is very useful when you're using other people's libraries. You get know what to catch, without needing a very well documented library.

                                          D Offline
                                          D Offline
                                          Dan Neely
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #74

                                          .... right up until something changes in the library and it can throw a new exception at which point the library author has to either break every single app that consumes it, cast the new exception into a different type defeating the purpose of typed exceptions in the first place, or just have every method throw exception from the start defeating the purpose of checked exceptions from the start. X|

                                          The European Way of War: Blow your own continent up. The American Way of War: Go over and help them.

                                          F V 2 Replies Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups