Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. I've been censored

I've been censored

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
questiondiscussion
52 Posts 16 Posters 5 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • C CaptainSeeSharp

    No, this is People's Unitary of Uhmerikka! You don't express your opinions in Uhmerikka, you don't even have the right to exist in this country.

    Fall of the Republic[^]

    M Offline
    M Offline
    Miszou
    wrote on last edited by
    #6

    CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

    you don't even have the right to exist in this country

    Citation please.

    The StartPage Randomizer - The Windows Cheerleader - Twitter

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • D Dirk Higbee

      I don't have to give any argument for or against anything here in America. I can speak it, write or even open my window and yell it to the world: "THIS IS RIDICULOUS!" Nobody has the right to tell me I cannot voice my opinion. It's a protected thing that sometimes people in power forget and try control to get their way.

      OMG what's the BFD?

      C Offline
      C Offline
      Corporal Agarn
      wrote on last edited by
      #7

      Have you heard some of the talking heads (radio commentators) that say freedom of speech is being challenged because you are to turn in people who do not agree with the president? I hope it is hype and not actual. djj

      D C 2 Replies Last reply
      0
      • D Dirk Higbee

        I don't have to give any argument for or against anything here in America. I can speak it, write or even open my window and yell it to the world: "THIS IS RIDICULOUS!" Nobody has the right to tell me I cannot voice my opinion. It's a protected thing that sometimes people in power forget and try control to get their way.

        OMG what's the BFD?

        D Offline
        D Offline
        Distind
        wrote on last edited by
        #8

        True, but they can call you an idiot, fail you, and move on with their day. Free speech is all yours, deal with the consequences of it.

        C 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • C Corporal Agarn

          Have you heard some of the talking heads (radio commentators) that say freedom of speech is being challenged because you are to turn in people who do not agree with the president? I hope it is hype and not actual. djj

          D Offline
          D Offline
          Distind
          wrote on last edited by
          #9

          It's called spin, the reality of it is the administration setup a place for people to toss those wonderfully false rumors these people spread into so that they could be aware of them and show how exactly they're false. A government sponsored snopes of sorts.

          C 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Maximilien

            Me think by writing "how ridiculous" without giving out arguments for (or against) pretty much makes that statement "censorable" in the context of academic studies. If you feel really censored, go see the dean (or whoever is in charge) and state your case ...

            This signature was proudly tested on animals.

            S Offline
            S Offline
            SilimSayo
            wrote on last edited by
            #10

            I think you took the freedom of speech thing too far. Try using freedom of speech in a courtroom and you'll quickly learn that no right is absolute! In a teacher-student relationship, certain language is unacceptable.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D Dirk Higbee

              I don't have to give any argument for or against anything here in America. I can speak it, write or even open my window and yell it to the world: "THIS IS RIDICULOUS!" Nobody has the right to tell me I cannot voice my opinion. It's a protected thing that sometimes people in power forget and try control to get their way.

              OMG what's the BFD?

              S Offline
              S Offline
              SilimSayo
              wrote on last edited by
              #11

              Yeah that is correct.... however, if you say something inappropriate in a certain setting, you may be penalised. There are no absolute rights! Try making antisemitic or racist remarks and see how far you'll go with your freedom of speech, or trying telling your boss that he/she is redicolous and see if freedom of speech will protect your job...... Anyway, wish you the best. I hope you don't get penalized.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • C Corporal Agarn

                Have you heard some of the talking heads (radio commentators) that say freedom of speech is being challenged because you are to turn in people who do not agree with the president? I hope it is hype and not actual. djj

                C Offline
                C Offline
                CaptainSeeSharp
                wrote on last edited by
                #12

                It was flag@whitehouse.gov. They also have databases for political descendants, its called the domestic terrorist database. There is also a no fly list, over a million Americans are on it, without there knowledge. If you get on any of these lists, you are on it for life.

                Fall of the Republic[^]

                D 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D Distind

                  It's called spin, the reality of it is the administration setup a place for people to toss those wonderfully false rumors these people spread into so that they could be aware of them and show how exactly they're false. A government sponsored snopes of sorts.

                  C Offline
                  C Offline
                  CaptainSeeSharp
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #13

                  Distind wrote:

                  the reality of it is the administration setup a place for people to toss those wonderfully false rumors these people spread into so that they could be aware of them and show how exactly they're false. A government sponsored snopes of sorts.

                  That is spin. X|

                  Fall of the Republic[^]

                  D 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • D Distind

                    True, but they can call you an idiot, fail you, and move on with their day. Free speech is all yours, deal with the consequences of it.

                    C Offline
                    C Offline
                    CaptainSeeSharp
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #14

                    Distind wrote:

                    deal with the consequences of it.

                    Yeah, you can go around breaking windows too, but you have to deal with the consequences. There is a big difference between expressing your thoughts with vocal patterns or written symbols and breaking windows.

                    Fall of the Republic[^]

                    D 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • D Dirk Higbee

                      I don't have to give any argument for or against anything here in America. I can speak it, write or even open my window and yell it to the world: "THIS IS RIDICULOUS!" Nobody has the right to tell me I cannot voice my opinion. It's a protected thing that sometimes people in power forget and try control to get their way.

                      OMG what's the BFD?

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      Diego Moita
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #15

                      One thing is to have an opinion and voice it. You should always have this right. It is called freedom of speech. Another thing is how and when you voice your opinion. It's called manners, cerimony. This is usefull because helps us avoid becoming like hutsus & tutsis or serbians & croatians cutting their throats for nothing. Or something like Kanye West and Joe Wilson. You can voice your opinion in the university, but use civilized language and manners. The place should not be like an internet forum, you know?


                      Of all forms of sexual aberration, the most unnatural is abstinence.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • D Dirk Higbee

                        Ok, so I'm going to school for my Associate's degree online. I had a question about a subject so I zipped an email over to my instructor. In the email I stated at one point "the whole thing makes no sense to me" and then I proposed a couple of scenarios written as questions and followed it up with "how ridiculous". I was promptly informed that content was inappropriate. Never mind it was my opinion and is protected by freedom of speech or that America was founded, fought, bought and paid for with the blood of my forefathers to protect the rights of an individual to express his or her opinions without recourse. I feel like Victor Navorski(Tom Hanks) in The Terminal: "I am......unacceptable" :laugh: It's going to be a long semester.

                        OMG what's the BFD?

                        J Offline
                        J Offline
                        James L Thomson
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #16

                        You say you're right to free speech was violated, so I'm guessing you were imprisoned after the incident, correct? Or at the very least, did the government step and threaten you?

                        C 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • J James L Thomson

                          You say you're right to free speech was violated, so I'm guessing you were imprisoned after the incident, correct? Or at the very least, did the government step and threaten you?

                          C Offline
                          C Offline
                          CaptainSeeSharp
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #17

                          His right was restricted, and he might be punished for attempting to exercise his basic god given right. How dare he use words to express his thoughts. And if the federal government or state government is contributing financially or regulating the school, then it was government sanctioned violations. Its criminal, criminals need to be prosecuted, and the institutions need to be corrected.

                          Fall of the Republic[^]

                          J 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • D Dirk Higbee

                            I don't have to give any argument for or against anything here in America. I can speak it, write or even open my window and yell it to the world: "THIS IS RIDICULOUS!" Nobody has the right to tell me I cannot voice my opinion. It's a protected thing that sometimes people in power forget and try control to get their way.

                            OMG what's the BFD?

                            J Offline
                            J Offline
                            James L Thomson
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #18

                            Dirk Higbee wrote:

                            Nobody has the right to tell me I cannot voice my opinion.

                            Actually, pretty much everyone has that right. It's called free speech, and it applies to other people's words just as much as it does to your own.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • C CaptainSeeSharp

                              His right was restricted, and he might be punished for attempting to exercise his basic god given right. How dare he use words to express his thoughts. And if the federal government or state government is contributing financially or regulating the school, then it was government sanctioned violations. Its criminal, criminals need to be prosecuted, and the institutions need to be corrected.

                              Fall of the Republic[^]

                              J Offline
                              J Offline
                              James L Thomson
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #19

                              You're attempting to punish his instructor for exercising his basic rights. You're also receiving financial contributions from the government. Ergo, by your logic, you need to be prosecuted.

                              C 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • D Dirk Higbee

                                Ok, so I'm going to school for my Associate's degree online. I had a question about a subject so I zipped an email over to my instructor. In the email I stated at one point "the whole thing makes no sense to me" and then I proposed a couple of scenarios written as questions and followed it up with "how ridiculous". I was promptly informed that content was inappropriate. Never mind it was my opinion and is protected by freedom of speech or that America was founded, fought, bought and paid for with the blood of my forefathers to protect the rights of an individual to express his or her opinions without recourse. I feel like Victor Navorski(Tom Hanks) in The Terminal: "I am......unacceptable" :laugh: It's going to be a long semester.

                                OMG what's the BFD?

                                I Offline
                                I Offline
                                Iain Clarke Warrior Programmer
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #20

                                OK, I'm a non-american, but even I know the freedom of speech thing says that the GOVERNMENT cannot restrict your speech byond certain well described limits. You sending an obnoxious email to an instructor, and him saying it was unacceptable is a liiiiittle bit short of being rounded up for acid showers, non? I *have* read about plenty of egregious problems to do with trampling of speech in US campuses, and people being all but kicked out because they did not sign up to some political agenda they didn't agree with. But on the evidence you've presented (and I understand why you may not give every detail), yours is not in that group. See here http://www.thefire.org/[^] for an organisation that fights against actual cases of speech / thought stifling. Iain. [modified to correct a couple of typos]

                                I have now moved to Sweden for love (awwww). If you're in Scandinavia and want an MVP on the payroll (or happy with a remote worker), or need cotract work done, give me a job! http://cv.imcsoft.co.uk/[^]

                                modified on Monday, September 28, 2009 3:05 PM

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • C CaptainSeeSharp

                                  Distind wrote:

                                  the reality of it is the administration setup a place for people to toss those wonderfully false rumors these people spread into so that they could be aware of them and show how exactly they're false. A government sponsored snopes of sorts.

                                  That is spin. X|

                                  Fall of the Republic[^]

                                  D Offline
                                  D Offline
                                  Distind
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #21

                                  Really? So what exactly is it? The exact same thing he did during the election to deal with the "He's a Muslim anti-christ from Kenya" rumors? Or something even more diabolical?

                                  C 1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • J James L Thomson

                                    You're attempting to punish his instructor for exercising his basic rights. You're also receiving financial contributions from the government. Ergo, by your logic, you need to be prosecuted.

                                    C Offline
                                    C Offline
                                    CaptainSeeSharp
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #22

                                    James L. Thomson wrote:

                                    You're attempting to punish his instructor for exercising his basic rights.

                                    What rights are you referring to? Educational institutions are a business, and he is being paid to serve Dirk, and Dirk has to pay one way or another for his instructor's services. The school should refund Dirk's money if they can't perform their duties.

                                    James L. Thomson wrote:

                                    You're also receiving financial contributions from the government. Ergo, by your logic, you need to be prosecuted.

                                    Citation? I don't collect welfare, I've paid half of my income into the system. You are out of line.

                                    Fall of the Republic[^]

                                    J 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • D Distind

                                      Really? So what exactly is it? The exact same thing he did during the election to deal with the "He's a Muslim anti-christ from Kenya" rumors? Or something even more diabolical?

                                      C Offline
                                      C Offline
                                      CaptainSeeSharp
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #23

                                      Distind wrote:

                                      So what exactly is it?

                                      Its a propaganda tool to control what people think, and it is good for collecting data about political dissidents.

                                      Fall of the Republic[^]

                                      D 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • C CaptainSeeSharp

                                        Distind wrote:

                                        deal with the consequences of it.

                                        Yeah, you can go around breaking windows too, but you have to deal with the consequences. There is a big difference between expressing your thoughts with vocal patterns or written symbols and breaking windows.

                                        Fall of the Republic[^]

                                        D Offline
                                        D Offline
                                        Distind
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #24

                                        Yes, if you prove your an idiot in a academic setting, you get failed. If you break a window you get to pay for it for face legal charges. These are quite typical, and if you didn't fail idiots for being idiots, then idiots would continue to be idiots without ever even considering they may be an idiot. I'm rather bored, so I figured I'd see how many times I could fit that into a sentence, though it seems to have become a runon much like this one.

                                        C 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • C CaptainSeeSharp

                                          James L. Thomson wrote:

                                          You're attempting to punish his instructor for exercising his basic rights.

                                          What rights are you referring to? Educational institutions are a business, and he is being paid to serve Dirk, and Dirk has to pay one way or another for his instructor's services. The school should refund Dirk's money if they can't perform their duties.

                                          James L. Thomson wrote:

                                          You're also receiving financial contributions from the government. Ergo, by your logic, you need to be prosecuted.

                                          Citation? I don't collect welfare, I've paid half of my income into the system. You are out of line.

                                          Fall of the Republic[^]

                                          J Offline
                                          J Offline
                                          James L Thomson
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #25

                                          CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

                                          What rights are you referring to? Educational institutions are a business, and he is being paid to serve Dirk, and Dirk has to pay one way or another for his instructor's services. The school should refund Dirk's money if they can't perform their duties.

                                          A person's basic rights do not cease to exist merely because they are employed. This instructor had every legal right to chastise his student for sending an obnoxious e-mail. Your suggestion that he be prosecuted is far closer to violating a person's free speech rights than he ever did, although it too falls well short of anything illegal. It's funny that you say your all for "free-speech" and then propose to legally punish those whose speech you don't agree with.

                                          CaptainSeeSharp wrote:

                                          Citation? I don't collect welfare, I've paid half of my income into the system. You are out of line.

                                          I thought I remembered you going into some long speech on your use of food stamps. Or maybe that was a different troll, you all look alike to me.

                                          C 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups