New Devbox
-
S. Brozius wrote:
I'm asking because there is a pretty hefty graphics-card included in the box, and I was wondering if that was a nice or necessary-feature
A bit of both, all I needed the graphics card for is for my 2nd screen. I too have a 24" LCD on my dev box accompanied by a 19" LCD
S. Brozius wrote:
I'm working an a Hewlett Packard dc7900...
I'm developing on an HP DX7400m, we added a GeForce 8500GT 512MB GPU to it for the 2nd screen. The main reason for getting this new box is I'll have to run 2 or 3 VM's at a time testing some SQL related stuff :cool:
Harvey Saayman - South Africa Software Developer .Net, C#, SQL
you.suck = (you.Occupation == jobTitles.Programmer && you.Passion != Programming)1000100 1101111 1100101 1110011 100000 1110100 1101000 1101001 1110011 100000 1101101 1100101 1100001 1101110 100000 1101001 1101101 100000 1100001 100000 1100111 1100101 1100101 1101011 111111Harvey Saayman wrote:
A bit of both, all I needed the graphics card for is for my 2nd screen. I too have a 24" LCD on my dev box accompanied by a 19" LCD
Wasn't there a cheaper GPU option available? Even a really low end chip can run two screens.
3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18
-
Is there any software that requires 12 GB of RAM? Windows Vista does not count as an answer. ;)
There is nothing right in my left brain and nothing left in my right brain.
-
You cant go wrong with the AMD Phenom X4 chips, it performs like a mother fucker and its not very expensive. We payed ZAR6299 for this rig(incl chassis, PSU, DVD Writer, etc...) Yes the Intel i7 chips or what ever is better, but they're also way WAY more expensive. AMD chips give you value for you hard earned cash :)
Harvey Saayman - South Africa Software Developer .Net, C#, SQL
you.suck = (you.Occupation == jobTitles.Programmer && you.Passion != Programming)1000100 1101111 1100101 1110011 100000 1110100 1101000 1101001 1110011 100000 1101101 1100101 1100001 1101110 100000 1101001 1101101 100000 1100001 100000 1100111 1100101 1100101 1101011 111111 -
At my new job, pretty much EVERYBODY that works in IT has FOUR 19-inch monitors connected to a Matrox G450 video card. I told them I wanted 22-inch monitors. Currently, I'm on a Dell single-core box running 2gb of RAM and a single 19-inch monitor, but my new system will be a quad core intel box with 8gb orf RAM (when they order it).
.45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly
-----
"Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997
-----
"The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001Sweet. Let us know how well it works out. My gut feeling is that unless you're filling them with RDP sessions to servers there's a diminishing return factor. I do ~70% of my work on my main screen only; and expect that less than 10% of the time would benefit from a third. Given the suckitude of USB-VGA adapters that's probably a good thing since there aren't any triple head laptop options. (And no, the Matrox box doesn't count.)
3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18
-
Harvey Saayman wrote:
A bit of both, all I needed the graphics card for is for my 2nd screen. I too have a 24" LCD on my dev box accompanied by a 19" LCD
Wasn't there a cheaper GPU option available? Even a really low end chip can run two screens.
3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18
ofcource, all I specified is a want an ATi GPU that can handle two screens. I got the quote from our suppliers and my MD approved it... So who am I to complain? :rolleyes:
Harvey Saayman - South Africa Software Developer .Net, C#, SQL
you.suck = (you.Occupation == jobTitles.Programmer && you.Passion != Programming)1000100 1101111 1100101 1110011 100000 1110100 1101000 1101001 1110011 100000 1101101 1100101 1100001 1101110 100000 1101001 1101101 100000 1100001 100000 1100111 1100101 1100101 1101011 111111 -
I'm so excited, we just ordered my new dev box for the office and I should get it this afternoon
AMD Phenom X4 Quad-Core @ 3.0Ghz
4 GIG RAM
500GIG SATA 2 HDD
ATi Radeon HD4650, 1GIG, 128bit, GDDR2, PCI-E 2.0Life is good :cool:
Harvey Saayman - South Africa Software Developer .Net, C#, SQL
you.suck = (you.Occupation == jobTitles.Programmer && you.Passion != Programming)1000100 1101111 1100101 1110011 100000 1110100 1101000 1101001 1110011 100000 1101101 1100101 1100001 1101110 100000 1101001 1101101 100000 1100001 100000 1100111 1100101 1100101 1101011 111111May I ask why AMD? I only recently threw out my beloved Opteron system, but at the moment, Intel seems to kicks AMD ass squarely performance-wise.
Personally, I love the idea that Raymond spends his nights posting bad regexs to mailing lists under the pseudonym of Jane Smith. He'd be like a super hero, only more nerdy and less useful. [Trevel]
| FoldWithUs! | sighist | µLaunch - program launcher for server core and hyper-v server -
May I ask why AMD? I only recently threw out my beloved Opteron system, but at the moment, Intel seems to kicks AMD ass squarely performance-wise.
Personally, I love the idea that Raymond spends his nights posting bad regexs to mailing lists under the pseudonym of Jane Smith. He'd be like a super hero, only more nerdy and less useful. [Trevel]
| FoldWithUs! | sighist | µLaunch - program launcher for server core and hyper-v serverpeterchen wrote:
May I ask why AMD?
Two reasons 0) I'm an AMD fanboy 1) These puppies kick ass and aren't very expensive Yes currently the Intel i7 chips r0ck performance wise, but they burn quite the hole in your wallet!
Harvey Saayman - South Africa Software Developer .Net, C#, SQL
you.suck = (you.Occupation == jobTitles.Programmer && you.Passion != Programming)1000100 1101111 1100101 1110011 100000 1110100 1101000 1101001 1110011 100000 1101101 1100101 1100001 1101110 100000 1101001 1101101 100000 1100001 100000 1100111 1100101 1100101 1101011 111111 -
peterchen wrote:
May I ask why AMD?
Two reasons 0) I'm an AMD fanboy 1) These puppies kick ass and aren't very expensive Yes currently the Intel i7 chips r0ck performance wise, but they burn quite the hole in your wallet!
Harvey Saayman - South Africa Software Developer .Net, C#, SQL
you.suck = (you.Occupation == jobTitles.Programmer && you.Passion != Programming)1000100 1101111 1100101 1110011 100000 1110100 1101000 1101001 1110011 100000 1101101 1100101 1100001 1101110 100000 1101001 1101101 100000 1100001 100000 1100111 1100101 1100101 1101011 111111Nice machine! I have a similar one but with 8GB RAM. No multimonitor yet though
Harvey Saayman wrote:
- I'm an AMD fanboy
Only reason needed for me :laugh:
...Of course, we're talking about software development here, where the simplest solution is often ignored..
-
peterchen wrote:
May I ask why AMD?
Two reasons 0) I'm an AMD fanboy 1) These puppies kick ass and aren't very expensive Yes currently the Intel i7 chips r0ck performance wise, but they burn quite the hole in your wallet!
Harvey Saayman - South Africa Software Developer .Net, C#, SQL
you.suck = (you.Occupation == jobTitles.Programmer && you.Passion != Programming)1000100 1101111 1100101 1110011 100000 1110100 1101000 1101001 1110011 100000 1101101 1100101 1100001 1101110 100000 1101001 1101101 100000 1100001 100000 1100111 1100101 1100101 1101011 111111The lga 1156 chips beat phenom up on price/performance. AMD only makes sense on bang/buck in the narrow range where they've got quads going against core2duo systems. I expect them to lose alot of ground there early next year when intel finishes rolling nehalem down the product line.
3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18
-
The company I work for does biometric time & attendance, access control, and shop floor data collection solutions. I've been developing the time & attendance package single handedly over the past two years, were busy running live beta's of it at LO'real SA, and SAFAIR :cool: Were currently busy integrating the access control features into my T&A package. Why do ya ask?
Harvey Saayman - South Africa Software Developer .Net, C#, SQL
you.suck = (you.Occupation == jobTitles.Programmer && you.Passion != Programming)1000100 1101111 1100101 1110011 100000 1110100 1101000 1101001 1110011 100000 1101101 1100101 1100001 1101110 100000 1101001 1101101 100000 1100001 100000 1100111 1100101 1100101 1101011 111111 -
peterchen wrote:
May I ask why AMD?
Two reasons 0) I'm an AMD fanboy 1) These puppies kick ass and aren't very expensive Yes currently the Intel i7 chips r0ck performance wise, but they burn quite the hole in your wallet!
Harvey Saayman - South Africa Software Developer .Net, C#, SQL
you.suck = (you.Occupation == jobTitles.Programmer && you.Passion != Programming)1000100 1101111 1100101 1110011 100000 1110100 1101000 1101001 1110011 100000 1101101 1100101 1100001 1101110 100000 1101001 1101101 100000 1100001 100000 1100111 1100101 1100101 1101011 111111I agree the AMD box has the better value, I'm paying a lot for the last 10 percent.
Harvey Saayman wrote:
I'm an AMD fanboy
I still am, in my heart. But when you hear that AMD loses $100 on every CPU sale you don't know if you should rather not buy to support them (might be a rumour, though).
Personally, I love the idea that Raymond spends his nights posting bad regexs to mailing lists under the pseudonym of Jane Smith. He'd be like a super hero, only more nerdy and less useful. [Trevel]
| FoldWithUs! | sighist | µLaunch - program launcher for server core and hyper-v server