Thanks, Red Gate
-
Thanks. Well, could kind of see it coming anyway.
-
Reflector, our beloved Reflector, will never be free again. From version 7 on, you'll have to dish out 35$. I don't know if it's a repost; search didn't produce results. Feels wrong. X|
Who couldn't see that coming a mile off. I read the e-mail about 20 mins ago, and I'm still p*ssed off, I wouldn't be if this hadn't started off as open source. To rub salt into the wound, the e-mail I received under "Links to More" has the splendidly named link "Free downloads of .NET Reflector.". I hope Redgate sinks.
Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^]
-Or-
A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^] -
There's not even one single alternative to Reflector. Software monopolies are bad, even if they are originally free (as we just found out).
Regards, Nish
Latest article: Code Project Posts Analyzer for Windows Phone 7 My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com
Nishant Sivakumar wrote:
There's not even one single alternative to Reflector.
Not for long :) http://twitter.com/#!/jbevain/status/32807256839950337[^]
-
Nishant Sivakumar wrote:
There's not even one single alternative to Reflector.
Not for long :) http://twitter.com/#!/jbevain/status/32807256839950337[^]
Cool!
Regards, Nish
Latest article: Code Project Posts Analyzer for Windows Phone 7 My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com
-
Reflector, our beloved Reflector, will never be free again. From version 7 on, you'll have to dish out 35$. I don't know if it's a repost; search didn't produce results. Feels wrong. X|
:sigh: I knew it would happen... there goes one of the most useful free utilities ever written for the .NET platform... Darn you Red Gate :mad: Maybe some of us here could get together and write something to replace it. It would be challenging but rewarding if we managed it. I've generated IL plenty of times before when DynamicMethod was the only dynamic code generation method in .NET. Reverse engineering would be harder but obviously it's possible.
-
Who couldn't see that coming a mile off. I read the e-mail about 20 mins ago, and I'm still p*ssed off, I wouldn't be if this hadn't started off as open source. To rub salt into the wound, the e-mail I received under "Links to More" has the splendidly named link "Free downloads of .NET Reflector.". I hope Redgate sinks.
Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^]
-Or-
A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^]I see you got home OK. How was the flight?
I'm not a stalker, I just know things. Oh by the way, you're out of milk.
Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads
-
Reflector, our beloved Reflector, will never be free again. From version 7 on, you'll have to dish out 35$. I don't know if it's a repost; search didn't produce results. Feels wrong. X|
Roberto Collina wrote:
From version 7 on, you'll have to dish out 35$
Oh, horror! That's almost a tank of gas in the US and half a tank in Europe! How on Earth are we going to afford it?
-
Roberto Collina wrote:
From version 7 on, you'll have to dish out 35$
Oh, horror! That's almost a tank of gas in the US and half a tank in Europe! How on Earth are we going to afford it?
-
Reflector, our beloved Reflector, will never be free again. From version 7 on, you'll have to dish out 35$. I don't know if it's a repost; search didn't produce results. Feels wrong. X|
Yeah, reflector was a good tool back before they bought it and I didn't like the forced upgrades even when it was free. Red Gate also used to make a good profiler, but it's gotten bogged down with features and harder to use. Their sql tools are good and I used them a lot when I worked with a 100+ databases ranging up to multiple TB daily, but I haven't touched them since.
Curvature of the Mind now with 3D
-
Don't worry, you'll see lots of open-source Reflectors popping up soon enough. However I don't think they'll reach the quality of the original any time soon. I'm working on the SharpDevelop project - we have Reflector integration, which we'll have to remove (any 3rd-party software supported by us must be free of charge). So we're currently discussing whether we should start such a project - we definately do have the knowlegde to build a decompiler (in fact one of us already built a prototype two years ago), but of course it would distract from the tons of other work we want to do for SharpDevelop. If anyone else is thinking about starting such a project, write me a mail :) I'm guessing we'll also see a discussion on the Mono.Cecil mailing list.
-
Roberto Collina wrote:
From version 7 on, you'll have to dish out 35$
Oh, horror! That's almost a tank of gas in the US and half a tank in Europe! How on Earth are we going to afford it?
Can I borrow a fiver? :-)
Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^]
-Or-
A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^] -
For that matter, as an individual user; how hard would it be to reflect Reflector and remove the timebomb from the current free version?
3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18
My last check, Reflector is obfuscated.
:..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTL -
Reflector, our beloved Reflector, will never be free again. From version 7 on, you'll have to dish out 35$. I don't know if it's a repost; search didn't produce results. Feels wrong. X|
On the bright side the original author has got some money for his effort.
There is only one Ashley Judd and Salma Hayek is her prophet! Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.
-
I did read the article, where do you think I got the quote from?
peterchen wrote:
What do you expect them to do
To keep their promises. They didn't have to keep developing the tool. They could have kept the tool static and the new features could have been made as a pay tool.
peterchen wrote:
"time bomb" forcing you to update
The time bomb was there to force you to update so Lutz would only have to support one version. It's Red Gate's spin to say it was put in as an option to sell the tool one day.
"If your actions inspire others to dream more, learn more, do more and become more, you are a leader." - John Quincy Adams "Let me get this straight. You know her. She knows you. But she wants to eat him. And everybody's okay with this?"
I understand your anger at losing a valueable tool, and I understand that $35 have different weight in different places. Still, it would be healthy to accept that when the free lunch is over, you should rather remember the good times had than sit moping. Imagine there would never have been a Reflector to begin with. From the Red Gate announcement in 2008: Our commitment is to maintain an amazing free tool (source[^]) Now, I know that's not all that's been said, and you can interpret it in different ways, but there's no promise of Reflector remaining free for all time, and I doubt Red Gate would have made such a statement officially. The time bomb: My point is that Reflector never was "perpetually yours" to begin with. Besides, if you want to maintain only one version, you just do, there's no need for a time bomb. Lutz never opted to make reflector open source, he got paid by Red Gate ( they flew out a guy to meet Lutz to close the deal[^], so I guess it wasn't just peanuts). Lutz deserves what he got (the outcry of the .NET community is proof enough for me), and Red Gate deserves their moneys for maintaining Reflector for over two years. $35 is an incredible fair price for a developer tool.
FILETIME to time_t
| FoldWithUs! | sighist | WhoIncludes - Analyzing C++ include file hierarchy -
Reflector, our beloved Reflector, will never be free again. From version 7 on, you'll have to dish out 35$. I don't know if it's a repost; search didn't produce results. Feels wrong. X|
You know, I find that annoying, but then I found it annoying that the once a year I need it, I'd always find it had expired. But, $95 IS small change for any working developer outside India, surely, and Red Gate clearly did not buy it to just keep giving it away. Don't blame Red Gate for paying for it and expecting a return, blame the guy who sold it, he must have known this would be the result.
Christian Graus Driven to the arms of OSX by Vista. Read my blog to find out how I've worked around bugs in Microsoft tools and frameworks.
-
Roberto Collina wrote:
From version 7 on, you'll have to dish out 35$
Oh, horror! That's almost a tank of gas in the US and half a tank in Europe! How on Earth are we going to afford it?
Have no idea why you was one voted, it probably has something to do with the Middle East crises and the increasing oil prices, compensating.
There is only one Ashley Judd and Salma Hayek is her prophet! Advertise here – minimum three posts per day are guaranteed.
-
Who couldn't see that coming a mile off. I read the e-mail about 20 mins ago, and I'm still p*ssed off, I wouldn't be if this hadn't started off as open source. To rub salt into the wound, the e-mail I received under "Links to More" has the splendidly named link "Free downloads of .NET Reflector.". I hope Redgate sinks.
Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^]
-Or-
A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^]Keith Barrow wrote:
I wouldn't be if this hadn't started off as open source.
Did it? The "time bomb" was supposedly implemented by Lutz himself, that would be kinda pointless for open source.
FILETIME to time_t
| FoldWithUs! | sighist | WhoIncludes - Analyzing C++ include file hierarchy -
Reflector, our beloved Reflector, will never be free again. From version 7 on, you'll have to dish out 35$. I don't know if it's a repost; search didn't produce results. Feels wrong. X|
If Lutz wanted to make certain that .NET Reflector stayed free, then he shouldn't have sold it to Red-Gate (or any company, for that matter). He should have either kept it himself or given it to the community. It's obvious to me that by his actions, this was inevitable and we should all be thankful that we had it, for free, as long as we did.
:..::. Douglas H. Troy ::..
Bad Astronomy |VCF|wxWidgets|WTL -
For that matter, as an individual user; how hard would it be to reflect Reflector and remove the timebomb from the current free version?
3x12=36 2x12=24 1x12=12 0x12=18
5 :-D
Cheers, विक्रम (Have gone past my troika - 4 CCCs!) "We have already been through this, I am not going to repeat myself." - fat_boy, in a global warming thread :doh:
-
I see you got home OK. How was the flight?
I'm not a stalker, I just know things. Oh by the way, you're out of milk.
Forgive your enemies - it messes with their heads
Pete O'Hanlon wrote:
I see you got home OK
Just in time for the riots :-) Flight was OK, but 20 min late at each leg. The on-board film was awful, some French nonsense called "Little White Lies/ Les petits mouchoirs". The characters were all such self-obsessed w***ers I wanted to beat each one of them to death with their own smugness, to make it worse the film was long. The wine was pretty decent though, so swings and roundabouts with Air France. I'll get in touch soon, pity we failed to meet up.
Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^]
-Or-
A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^]
