Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Nothing Changes [modified]

Nothing Changes [modified]

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
66 Posts 24 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • realJSOPR realJSOP

    From what I've seen, their command and control structure is pretty good (they kicked the Russians out of Afghanistan and are doing a pretty good job on the US there as well), and if anyone thinks an order of succession wasn't established immediately after 9/11 are sadly mistaken. There will be little/no effect on their operations, and for all we know, Osama's death may have been the trigger to activate a number of sleeper cells around the world. Call me cynical if you want to...

    ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
    -----
    You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
    -----
    "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997

    K Offline
    K Offline
    Keith Barrow
    wrote on last edited by
    #21

    Al Qaeda is an odd one, the best way to look at it is as a fast food franchise: Fancy committing a terrorist atrocity? We'll train you to our standards and you can slap the al-Qaeda stamp of approval on it. That way the cell gets more notariety if they succede, and al-Qaeda looks bigger than it really is. I even heard the view expressed here that al-Qaeda doesn't exist in any meaninful sense, it is more a figurehead organisation. The hope is that with the charismatic [apparently] OBL gone, they'll attract fewer nut-jobs willing to murder in the name of whatever. The problem is, as you correctly point out, there is an increased likeliehood of reprisals in the short term at least.

    Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^]
    -Or-
    A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^]

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • E Ennis Ray Lynch Jr

      Because that means airport security is supposed to go back to the way it was, the patriot act is supposed to get canned, and all this anti-terrorism, infinite war stuff is supposed to end. The goal was to catch or kill him, so it is over right? And yes, I am the conservative.

      Need custom software developed? I do custom programming based primarily on MS tools with an emphasis on C# development and consulting. I also do Android Programming as I find it a refreshing break from the MS. "And they, since they Were not the one dead, turned to their affairs" -- Robert Frost

      U Offline
      U Offline
      User 7855753
      wrote on last edited by
      #22

      No government ever voluntarily reduces itself in size. Government programs, once launched, never disappear. Actually, a government bureau is the nearest thing to eternal life we'll ever see on this earth! Ronald Reagan

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • U Umair Feroze

        History about Al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden is quite bitter. The orgainzation and the character were created by US government to defeat Russia. Afterwards, nothing happened. Then all of a sudden 9/11 took place. After this incident which was condemed by every society, nothing happened in US. But Afghanistan and Iraq were burnt for searching. The same is happening in Pakistan now.

        I Offline
        I Offline
        IdUnknown
        wrote on last edited by
        #23

        I really hate to reply on this subject but there are just so many things that are wrong in this post.

        Umair Feroze wrote:

        History about Al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden is quite bitter. The organization and the character were created by US government to defeat Russia. Afterwards, nothing happened. Then all of a sudden 9/11 took place.

        Your need to really do research on the history of Ayman al-Zawahiri and Bin Laden. Anyways, nothing happened? Then all of a sudden 9/11? How about the USS Cole and the Embassies bombings? Or the 1993 World Trade Center Bombing? I know it's not Bin Laden in WTC bombing in '93 but it was still a warning about the rise of Radical Islam. I don't want to turn this into a flame war. There is the BackRoom to serve the purpose.

        U 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K Keith Barrow

          I Believe In GOD wrote:

          Japan

          Evil despotic regime beaten by Allied Forces. Ask any Chinese to see how popular they were there, or anyone captured by them (especially the "comfort girls").

          I Believe In GOD wrote:

          Afghanistan

          Beheading, stoning, public beating of women. Further repression of women who were only allowed to be medics as they weren't allowed to see a male doctor. Closure of education system to girls, and boys (the latter because most teachers were women). Drug dealing (contrary to their own idealogy)

          I Believe In GOD wrote:

          Iraq

          Man removed who gassed in the order of 100,000 of his own population, brutally torturing & repressing his people. Started a war with neighbouring country with little/no pretext.

          I Believe In GOD wrote:

          Palestine

          No direct US involvement

          I Believe In GOD wrote:

          Iran

          Theocracy with appalling human rights abuses.

          I Believe In GOD wrote:

          Vietnam

          OK they got that one wrong. 4-1 (with 1 result outstanding). What was your point again? Did you have one?

          Sort of a cross between Lawrence of Arabia and Dilbert.[^]
          -Or-
          A Dead ringer for Kate Winslett[^]

          modified on Monday, May 2, 2011 9:41 AM

          L Offline
          L Offline
          Lost User
          wrote on last edited by
          #24

          You really think your self got 4 points ? My English is not native , I find it very hard to express my self . USA didn't have the right , to apply human rights on us , because it didn't apply human rights on Israel at Palestine . More over : USA make her self worried about Middle East , and human rights , just because She hate Islam , She Hate Leader who didn't corporate with her ! And Hollywood , show us as useless items in the movies . Again When USA Invade Iraq she killed more than 100,000 , and make the other 100,000 homeless and for Afghanistan you talking about beating woman , how about the woman that get raped by USA soldiers ? What about drug hat every USA home has ? What about the drugs between USA school kids ? In Palestine : Yes no direct involved Like I gave you a gun and you kill your neighbor ? You think you will be the only one responsible for that , or I am responsible with you ? what about the USA money help for Israel ? Iran : they fought Iran for nuclear peaceful nuclear they built not for human rights ! Please : TELL USA , to fix her mistake before searching for ours mistakes and judge us on them ! This talking is not for you in personal , I don't hate you , Nor I don't hate any USA citizen I just love peace , a balance ... People like you and me don't make wars , political are ! , And from our country middle east , you didn't see the women , and the kids , you only see our political and soldier .

          I know nothing , I know nothing ... RIP Osama Bin Laden, you were thorn in USA throat , And you will always be ...

          K 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Maximilien

            people need closure. that's it that's all.

            Watched code never compiles.

            J Offline
            J Offline
            Johnny J
            wrote on last edited by
            #25

            I just read that his body has been dumped at sea. Now isn't that a convenient coincidence? I would have thought that the Americans would have revelled in showing pictures of their dead archenemy the way it happened with Saddam Hussein and others before him. They sure as hell wouldn't have "buried" him so damn fast... I smell a rat here (and I don't mean Bin Laden)... Maybe it has to do with your point of closure...

            Why can't I be applicable like John? - Me, April 2011
            -----
            Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach
            -----
            Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
            -----
            Just because a thing is new don’t mean that it’s better - Will Rogers, September 4, 1932

            M D 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • J Johnny J

              I just read that his body has been dumped at sea. Now isn't that a convenient coincidence? I would have thought that the Americans would have revelled in showing pictures of their dead archenemy the way it happened with Saddam Hussein and others before him. They sure as hell wouldn't have "buried" him so damn fast... I smell a rat here (and I don't mean Bin Laden)... Maybe it has to do with your point of closure...

              Why can't I be applicable like John? - Me, April 2011
              -----
              Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach
              -----
              Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
              -----
              Just because a thing is new don’t mean that it’s better - Will Rogers, September 4, 1932

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Maximilien
              wrote on last edited by
              #26

              AFAIK, They dumped him at sea to prevent the creation of a physical "shrine" for supporters to gather.

              Watched code never compiles.

              J 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • J Johnny J

                Don't worry, John - The bastard is never gonna rest in peace where he's heading...

                Why can't I be applicable like John? - Me, April 2011
                -----
                Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach
                -----
                Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
                -----
                Just because a thing is new don’t mean that it’s better - Will Rogers, September 4, 1932

                realJSOPR Online
                realJSOPR Online
                realJSOP
                wrote on last edited by
                #27

                I'd like to see his face when he realizes the seven virgins are all men...

                ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                -----
                You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                -----
                "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997

                J 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  "Wreak havoc" May be you should search for this word , through USA AND Israel history. Ask the history about those ... Vietnam Japan Afghanistan Iraq Palestine Iran

                  I know nothing , I know nothing ... RIP Osama Bin Laden, you were thorn in USA throat , And you will always be ...

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  Dave Kreskowiak
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #28

                  I Believe In GOD wrote:

                  I know nothing , I know nothing ...
                  RIP Osama Bin Laden, you were thorn in USA throat ,
                  And you will always be ...

                  So, you revere a mass-murderer of Muslims? You are correct. You know absolutely nothing.

                  A guide to posting questions on CodeProject[^]
                  Dave Kreskowiak

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • I IdUnknown

                    I really hate to reply on this subject but there are just so many things that are wrong in this post.

                    Umair Feroze wrote:

                    History about Al-Qaeda and Osama bin Laden is quite bitter. The organization and the character were created by US government to defeat Russia. Afterwards, nothing happened. Then all of a sudden 9/11 took place.

                    Your need to really do research on the history of Ayman al-Zawahiri and Bin Laden. Anyways, nothing happened? Then all of a sudden 9/11? How about the USS Cole and the Embassies bombings? Or the 1993 World Trade Center Bombing? I know it's not Bin Laden in WTC bombing in '93 but it was still a warning about the rise of Radical Islam. I don't want to turn this into a flame war. There is the BackRoom to serve the purpose.

                    U Offline
                    U Offline
                    Umair Feroze
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #29

                    IdUnknown wrote:

                    Or the 1993 World Trade Center Bombing? I know it's not Bin Laden in WTC bombing in '93 but it was still a warning about the rise of Radical Islam

                    Please let me clear a point over here. Islam never asked the followers to kill innocent people of any religon or region. If someone do this, he is not a follower of Islam. Therefore you cant say the rise of Radical Islam but the rise of Radical group

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R Rage

                      John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

                      we are still out here making targets of ourselves

                      instead of ?? Even if I buy myself a shotgun, I do not see how this could prevent terrorism ???

                      realJSOPR Online
                      realJSOPR Online
                      realJSOP
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #30

                      A shotgun by itself won't allow you to "prevent terrorism", but it will allow you to mitigate its effects if it happens to visit you personally (I'm thinking the Mumbai event from a few years ago).

                      ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                      -----
                      You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                      -----
                      "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997

                      S R 2 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • M Maximilien

                        AFAIK, They dumped him at sea to prevent the creation of a physical "shrine" for supporters to gather.

                        Watched code never compiles.

                        J Offline
                        J Offline
                        Johnny J
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #31

                        Yes, but they didn't have to do that so damn fast - and without ANY documented proof that it WAS the right body.

                        Why can't I be applicable like John? - Me, April 2011
                        -----
                        Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach
                        -----
                        Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
                        -----
                        Just because a thing is new don’t mean that it’s better - Will Rogers, September 4, 1932

                        realJSOPR 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • J Johnny J

                          I just read that his body has been dumped at sea. Now isn't that a convenient coincidence? I would have thought that the Americans would have revelled in showing pictures of their dead archenemy the way it happened with Saddam Hussein and others before him. They sure as hell wouldn't have "buried" him so damn fast... I smell a rat here (and I don't mean Bin Laden)... Maybe it has to do with your point of closure...

                          Why can't I be applicable like John? - Me, April 2011
                          -----
                          Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach
                          -----
                          Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
                          -----
                          Just because a thing is new don’t mean that it’s better - Will Rogers, September 4, 1932

                          D Offline
                          D Offline
                          Dave Kreskowiak
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #32

                          Think about it. If we hung him up as a trophy for all to see it would just infuriate more Muslim people and create even more terrorists. We buried him at sea to show the rest of the Muslim world that we respect their religion far more than he ever did. The idea is to show we are respectful professionals in handling this. They think we're still a bunch of crusading barbarians bent on destroying the Muslim world.

                          A guide to posting questions on CodeProject[^]
                          Dave Kreskowiak

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • L Lost User

                            You really think your self got 4 points ? My English is not native , I find it very hard to express my self . USA didn't have the right , to apply human rights on us , because it didn't apply human rights on Israel at Palestine . More over : USA make her self worried about Middle East , and human rights , just because She hate Islam , She Hate Leader who didn't corporate with her ! And Hollywood , show us as useless items in the movies . Again When USA Invade Iraq she killed more than 100,000 , and make the other 100,000 homeless and for Afghanistan you talking about beating woman , how about the woman that get raped by USA soldiers ? What about drug hat every USA home has ? What about the drugs between USA school kids ? In Palestine : Yes no direct involved Like I gave you a gun and you kill your neighbor ? You think you will be the only one responsible for that , or I am responsible with you ? what about the USA money help for Israel ? Iran : they fought Iran for nuclear peaceful nuclear they built not for human rights ! Please : TELL USA , to fix her mistake before searching for ours mistakes and judge us on them ! This talking is not for you in personal , I don't hate you , Nor I don't hate any USA citizen I just love peace , a balance ... People like you and me don't make wars , political are ! , And from our country middle east , you didn't see the women , and the kids , you only see our political and soldier .

                            I know nothing , I know nothing ... RIP Osama Bin Laden, you were thorn in USA throat , And you will always be ...

                            K Offline
                            K Offline
                            Keith Barrow
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #33

                            I Believe In GOD wrote:

                            In Palestine : Yes no direct involved
                            Like I gave you a gun and you kill your neighbor ?
                             
                            You think you will be the only one responsible for that , or I am responsible with you ?
                             
                            what about the USA money help for Israel ?

                            I Believe In GOD wrote:

                            USA didn't have the right , to apply human rights on us , because it didn't apply human rights
                            on Israel at Palestine .

                            So it is OK to apply human rights to Israel and Palestine? If so they can apply them wherever they want. Also, they haven't applied them to Syria.

                            I Believe In GOD wrote:

                            More over : USA make her self worried about Middle East , and human rights , just because
                            She hate Islam

                            Prove it.

                            I Believe In GOD wrote:

                            Again
                            When USA Invade Iraq she killed more than 100,000 , and make the other 100,000 homeless

                            Well the proper figure is 50,000. The rest were killed by Iraqi insurgents, the total is for war conditions. The order of magnitude that I gave for Saddam might be as high as 2 million, the most cited figure is 300,000 in peactime.

                            I Believe In GOD wrote:

                            and for Afghanistan you talking about beating woman , how about the woman that get raped by USA soldiers ?

                            Beatings, stoning an beheading and removal of most basic human rights from all women. Despite the crimes committed by a few wrong-doing soldiers, I'd say the lot of women has gone up. Oh and the soldiers were brought to trail. ss="FQA">I Believe In GOD wrote:What about drug hat every USA home has ?
                             
                            What about the drugs between USA school kids I think the USians might be appalled at all being called drug users. Anyway, they didn't use religion as a means to get political power, then sell drugs contrary to their own religion.

                            I Believe In GOD wrote:

                            And from our country middle east , you didn't see the women , and the kids , you only see our political and soldier .

                            I'm married to an Arab, read my profile. I agree the West sees the bad in the Middle East, Arabs are de-humanised into a block-threat bunch of terrorist nut-jobs, whereas most are peaceful and just want to get on with their li

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • realJSOPR realJSOP

                              A shotgun by itself won't allow you to "prevent terrorism", but it will allow you to mitigate its effects if it happens to visit you personally (I'm thinking the Mumbai event from a few years ago).

                              ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                              -----
                              You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                              -----
                              "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997

                              S Offline
                              S Offline
                              Sandesh M Patil
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #34

                              John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

                              Mumbai

                              Thanks to call Mumbai not as Bombay :-D

                              Cheers,
                              SMP

                              Recent Tip/Tricks
                              Prevent a drag and drop text and Copy paste text in your textbox control
                              Find a column name within SQL database

                              R 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • J Johnny J

                                Yes, but they didn't have to do that so damn fast - and without ANY documented proof that it WAS the right body.

                                Why can't I be applicable like John? - Me, April 2011
                                -----
                                Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach
                                -----
                                Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
                                -----
                                Just because a thing is new don’t mean that it’s better - Will Rogers, September 4, 1932

                                realJSOPR Online
                                realJSOPR Online
                                realJSOP
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #35

                                If you think pictures weren't taken of the boidy, and video isn't available from the raid itself, you are sadly mistaken. It's just a matter of time before they surface for public consumption. Besides that, nobody in the terrorist world is claiming that the US DIDN'T kill him, so that goes a long way toward a certain level of legitmacy in the claim.

                                ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                                -----
                                You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                                -----
                                "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • realJSOPR realJSOP

                                  I'd like to see his face when he realizes the seven virgins are all men...

                                  ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                                  -----
                                  You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                                  -----
                                  "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997

                                  J Offline
                                  J Offline
                                  Johnny J
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #36

                                  Hope he makes it down there soon. On friday it's his turn in the barrel... :laugh:

                                  Why can't I be applicable like John? - Me, April 2011
                                  -----
                                  Beidh ceol, caint agus craic againn - Seán Bán Breathnach
                                  -----
                                  Da mihi sis crustum Etruscum cum omnibus in eo!
                                  -----
                                  Just because a thing is new don’t mean that it’s better - Will Rogers, September 4, 1932

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • realJSOPR realJSOP

                                    A shotgun by itself won't allow you to "prevent terrorism", but it will allow you to mitigate its effects if it happens to visit you personally (I'm thinking the Mumbai event from a few years ago).

                                    ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                                    -----
                                    You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                                    -----
                                    "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997

                                    R Offline
                                    R Offline
                                    Rage
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #37

                                    Who am I to be allowed to shoot on people whatever they intentions are ? It is not because a bunch of bastards do it that I am to be as bad as they are: call me naive and idealist, I prefer the solution where noone has any kind of weapons, instead of everybody being armed. But I also know we disagree about that :)

                                    realJSOPR W 2 Replies Last reply
                                    0
                                    • W wolfbinary

                                      John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

                                      The terrorists are still out there

                                      Yes they are, we still have a lot of blow back from the Cold War and it's not like Islamic terrorism is new http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_World_Trade_Center_bombing[^]. Now this happened under Clinton, while being planned under Bush Senior. So who to blame is up to you and often depends on which political party you most identify with.

                                      That's called seagull management (or sometimes pigeon management)... Fly in, flap your arms and squawk a lot, crap all over everything and fly out again... by _Damian S_

                                      U Offline
                                      U Offline
                                      Umair Feroze
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #38

                                      wolfbinary wrote:

                                      it's not like Islamic terrorism is new http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/1993_World_Trade_Center_bombing[^].

                                      I am so griefed on reading the term Islamic Terrorism. Can't it be only terrorrism? Do you have any knowledge of Islam? Islam condems the act of terrorism. Don't we have terrorists in other religions.

                                      realJSOPR 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • R Rage

                                        Who am I to be allowed to shoot on people whatever they intentions are ? It is not because a bunch of bastards do it that I am to be as bad as they are: call me naive and idealist, I prefer the solution where noone has any kind of weapons, instead of everybody being armed. But I also know we disagree about that :)

                                        realJSOPR Online
                                        realJSOPR Online
                                        realJSOP
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #39

                                        Then the issue would be with owning swords, knives, and archery equipment, and eventually plain old rocks and sticks. Once again, nothing changes.

                                        ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                                        -----
                                        You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                                        -----
                                        "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997

                                        R 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • realJSOPR realJSOP

                                          Then the issue would be with owning swords, knives, and archery equipment, and eventually plain old rocks and sticks. Once again, nothing changes.

                                          ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
                                          -----
                                          You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
                                          -----
                                          "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997

                                          R Offline
                                          R Offline
                                          Rage
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #40

                                          At least this would be much more fun :-)

                                          realJSOPR 1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups