Did no-one at Disney not spot this?
-
The Lion King[^] Who else can see the young lady with the pertest of bottoms wearing only a tiny pair of pants and holding her arms in the air? Tugs the old Chordae Tendineae doesn't it.
--------------------------------- I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^]
Maybe they got some money from Victoria Secret?
VS2010/Atmel Studio 6.0 ToDo Manager Extension
Version 3.0 now available. There is no place like 127.0.0.1 -
The Lion King[^] Who else can see the young lady with the pertest of bottoms wearing only a tiny pair of pants and holding her arms in the air? Tugs the old Chordae Tendineae doesn't it.
--------------------------------- I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^]
Our word of the day: pareidolia[^].
-
I see what you are saying. I have a deep interest in attractive ladies and see them everywhere. My psychiatrist has a terrible time with the Rorshach Tests.
--------------------------------- I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^]
Dalek Dave wrote:
I have a deep interest in attractive ladies and see them everywhere.
I assure you that you are not the only one here, that can appreciate an elusive lady.
-
The Lion King[^] Who else can see the young lady with the pertest of bottoms wearing only a tiny pair of pants and holding her arms in the air? Tugs the old Chordae Tendineae doesn't it.
--------------------------------- I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^]
-
The Lion King[^] Who else can see the young lady with the pertest of bottoms wearing only a tiny pair of pants and holding her arms in the air? Tugs the old Chordae Tendineae doesn't it.
--------------------------------- I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^]
I don't see it. There are a few other optical illusions that I don't get no matter how often I look at them. Yet others which I see right away. Then again, my wonderfully perverted mind is apparently not perverted enough. (I find it ironic that some of the biggest moral scolds seem to have minds of utter filth since they find the most amazing things nobody else notices, often even after having it being explained in detail.)
-
The Lion King[^] Who else can see the young lady with the pertest of bottoms wearing only a tiny pair of pants and holding her arms in the air? Tugs the old Chordae Tendineae doesn't it.
--------------------------------- I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^]
Technically, if no-one at Disney didn't spot it, that means that everyone at Disney did spot it. ;P
"These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer
-
The Lion King[^] Who else can see the young lady with the pertest of bottoms wearing only a tiny pair of pants and holding her arms in the air? Tugs the old Chordae Tendineae doesn't it.
--------------------------------- I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^]
If your brain can translate that bloated, mis-shapen image into 'the pertest of bottoms' then you need to get out more. I'm to the point where I'm about willing to take up a collection to get you laid - because if it's affecting your eyes this way it is a de facto medical emergency.
-
I don't see it. There are a few other optical illusions that I don't get no matter how often I look at them. Yet others which I see right away. Then again, my wonderfully perverted mind is apparently not perverted enough. (I find it ironic that some of the biggest moral scolds seem to have minds of utter filth since they find the most amazing things nobody else notices, often even after having it being explained in detail.)
Maybe you're looking to hard. It isn't an optical illusion. It was obvious to me, and two friends I've just shown.
-
If your brain can translate that bloated, mis-shapen image into 'the pertest of bottoms' then you need to get out more. I'm to the point where I'm about willing to take up a collection to get you laid - because if it's affecting your eyes this way it is a de facto medical emergency.
-
Maybe you're looking to hard. It isn't an optical illusion. It was obvious to me, and two friends I've just shown.
Actually, I suspect that many optical illusions work only with specific brain types. I vaguely recall from a paper I read decades ago that this isn't a theory original with me. My vague memory is that in experiments, some people never saw the illusions, others saw them after prompting and some only saw the illusions (either from the original sighting or after being shown it.) I suspect other factors are how the drawing was done, as in color, photograph, line drawing, etc..
-
Actually, I suspect that many optical illusions work only with specific brain types. I vaguely recall from a paper I read decades ago that this isn't a theory original with me. My vague memory is that in experiments, some people never saw the illusions, others saw them after prompting and some only saw the illusions (either from the original sighting or after being shown it.) I suspect other factors are how the drawing was done, as in color, photograph, line drawing, etc..
I call them optical conclusions.
-
The Lion King[^] Who else can see the young lady with the pertest of bottoms wearing only a tiny pair of pants and holding her arms in the air? Tugs the old Chordae Tendineae doesn't it.
--------------------------------- I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^]
-
Actually, I suspect that many optical illusions work only with specific brain types. I vaguely recall from a paper I read decades ago that this isn't a theory original with me. My vague memory is that in experiments, some people never saw the illusions, others saw them after prompting and some only saw the illusions (either from the original sighting or after being shown it.) I suspect other factors are how the drawing was done, as in color, photograph, line drawing, etc..
I think that is a valid and good suspicion.
-
Dalek Dave wrote:
My psychiatrist has a terrible time with the Rorshach Tests.
Let me guess. :) Dr: This? DD: Lady in underwear. Dr: This? DD: Lady without underwear. Dr: This? DD: Lady with hat Dr: This? DD: Lady with hat and no clothes...
It was broke, so I fixed it.
Dr: You're a pervert. DD: No, you're the one with the pictures!
-
The Lion King[^] Who else can see the young lady with the pertest of bottoms wearing only a tiny pair of pants and holding her arms in the air? Tugs the old Chordae Tendineae doesn't it.
--------------------------------- I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^]
-
-
Dr: You're a pervert. DD: No, you're the one with the pictures!
;) Good one.
It was broke, so I fixed it.
