Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Did no-one at Disney not spot this?

Did no-one at Disney not spot this?

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
comadobequestion
22 Posts 13 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Dalek Dave

    The Lion King[^] Who else can see the young lady with the pertest of bottoms wearing only a tiny pair of pants and holding her arms in the air? Tugs the old Chordae Tendineae doesn't it.

    --------------------------------- I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^]

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #11

    If your brain can translate that bloated, mis-shapen image into 'the pertest of bottoms' then you need to get out more. I'm to the point where I'm about willing to take up a collection to get you laid - because if it's affecting your eyes this way it is a de facto medical emergency.

    J 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • J Joe Woodbury

      I don't see it. There are a few other optical illusions that I don't get no matter how often I look at them. Yet others which I see right away. Then again, my wonderfully perverted mind is apparently not perverted enough. (I find it ironic that some of the biggest moral scolds seem to have minds of utter filth since they find the most amazing things nobody else notices, often even after having it being explained in detail.)

      B Offline
      B Offline
      Brady Kelly
      wrote on last edited by
      #12

      Maybe you're looking to hard. It isn't an optical illusion. It was obvious to me, and two friends I've just shown.

      J 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • L Lost User

        If your brain can translate that bloated, mis-shapen image into 'the pertest of bottoms' then you need to get out more. I'm to the point where I'm about willing to take up a collection to get you laid - because if it's affecting your eyes this way it is a de facto medical emergency.

        J Offline
        J Offline
        Joe Woodbury
        wrote on last edited by
        #13

        Remember, this is the guy who just watched Phase IV[^]. He's liable to see anything in anything.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • B Brady Kelly

          Maybe you're looking to hard. It isn't an optical illusion. It was obvious to me, and two friends I've just shown.

          J Offline
          J Offline
          Joe Woodbury
          wrote on last edited by
          #14

          Actually, I suspect that many optical illusions work only with specific brain types. I vaguely recall from a paper I read decades ago that this isn't a theory original with me. My vague memory is that in experiments, some people never saw the illusions, others saw them after prompting and some only saw the illusions (either from the original sighting or after being shown it.) I suspect other factors are how the drawing was done, as in color, photograph, line drawing, etc..

          C B 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • J Joe Woodbury

            Actually, I suspect that many optical illusions work only with specific brain types. I vaguely recall from a paper I read decades ago that this isn't a theory original with me. My vague memory is that in experiments, some people never saw the illusions, others saw them after prompting and some only saw the illusions (either from the original sighting or after being shown it.) I suspect other factors are how the drawing was done, as in color, photograph, line drawing, etc..

            C Offline
            C Offline
            Corporal Agarn
            wrote on last edited by
            #15

            I call them optical conclusions.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D Dalek Dave

              The Lion King[^] Who else can see the young lady with the pertest of bottoms wearing only a tiny pair of pants and holding her arms in the air? Tugs the old Chordae Tendineae doesn't it.

              --------------------------------- I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^]

              D Offline
              D Offline
              daniilzol
              wrote on last edited by
              #16

              rofl, it took me a while, but now I see it. And now that I've seen it once I will always see it whenever I look at that picture. Thanks!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • J Joe Woodbury

                Actually, I suspect that many optical illusions work only with specific brain types. I vaguely recall from a paper I read decades ago that this isn't a theory original with me. My vague memory is that in experiments, some people never saw the illusions, others saw them after prompting and some only saw the illusions (either from the original sighting or after being shown it.) I suspect other factors are how the drawing was done, as in color, photograph, line drawing, etc..

                B Offline
                B Offline
                Brady Kelly
                wrote on last edited by
                #17

                I think that is a valid and good suspicion.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • S S Houghtelin

                  Dalek Dave wrote:

                  My psychiatrist has a terrible time with the Rorshach Tests.

                  Let me guess. :) Dr: This? DD: Lady in underwear. Dr: This? DD: Lady without underwear. Dr: This? DD: Lady with hat Dr: This? DD: Lady with hat and no clothes...

                  It was broke, so I fixed it.

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  Joe Woodbury
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #18

                  Dr: You're a pervert. DD: No, you're the one with the pictures!

                  S 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • D Dalek Dave

                    The Lion King[^] Who else can see the young lady with the pertest of bottoms wearing only a tiny pair of pants and holding her arms in the air? Tugs the old Chordae Tendineae doesn't it.

                    --------------------------------- I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^]

                    W Offline
                    W Offline
                    wizardzz
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #19

                    The bottoms are not tiny, it's the ass that's massive.

                    D 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • W wizardzz

                      The bottoms are not tiny, it's the ass that's massive.

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      Dalek Dave
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #20

                      It's smaller than yo momma's :)

                      --------------------------------- I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^]

                      W 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • D Dalek Dave

                        It's smaller than yo momma's :)

                        --------------------------------- I will never again mention that I was the poster of the One Millionth Lounge Post, nor that it was complete drivel. Dalek Dave CCC Link[^]

                        W Offline
                        W Offline
                        wizardzz
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #21

                        I never said it was a bad thing. :sigh:

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • J Joe Woodbury

                          Dr: You're a pervert. DD: No, you're the one with the pictures!

                          S Offline
                          S Offline
                          S Houghtelin
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #22

                          ;) Good one.

                          It was broke, so I fixed it.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          Reply
                          • Reply as topic
                          Log in to reply
                          • Oldest to Newest
                          • Newest to Oldest
                          • Most Votes


                          • Login

                          • Don't have an account? Register

                          • Login or register to search.
                          • First post
                            Last post
                          0
                          • Categories
                          • Recent
                          • Tags
                          • Popular
                          • World
                          • Users
                          • Groups