Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Windows Update is so sllooooowwwww...

Windows Update is so sllooooowwwww...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
performancehelpquestionannouncement
24 Posts 8 Posters 1 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Lost User

    I'm doing some updates to my XP via Windows Update. It is working so fast that I've almost felt asleep... :zzz: For 32Mb of downloads it is working for hours (at the amazing speed of about 30 kbits/s :omg: ). I have no speed problems when going to other sites, so the problem really is with Windows Update. Thank god I do all my programming in another machine, or else I don't know how I could explain to my boss "Yes, I know, I'm sitting here watching the screen for about 4 hours, but I'm just waiting for the updates to finish download..." :-D Has anyone else noticed problems with Windows Update today?

    R Offline
    R Offline
    Rickard Andersson20
    wrote on last edited by
    #2

    Mad_Matrix wrote: at the amazing speed of about 30 kbits/s That's even slower than a usual 56k modem! How do you survive!? Rickard Andersson8 Here is my card, contact me later! UIN: 50302279 E-Mail: nikado@pc.nu Interests: C++, ADO, SQL, Winsock, 0s and 1s

    R L 2 Replies Last reply
    0
    • L Lost User

      I'm doing some updates to my XP via Windows Update. It is working so fast that I've almost felt asleep... :zzz: For 32Mb of downloads it is working for hours (at the amazing speed of about 30 kbits/s :omg: ). I have no speed problems when going to other sites, so the problem really is with Windows Update. Thank god I do all my programming in another machine, or else I don't know how I could explain to my boss "Yes, I know, I'm sitting here watching the screen for about 4 hours, but I'm just waiting for the updates to finish download..." :-D Has anyone else noticed problems with Windows Update today?

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #3

      You know you could still use the machine while it is downloading the updates. Just a thought! Joel VssConnect - Remote SourceSafe(r) Access http://www.voxcode.com[^]

      L 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • R Rickard Andersson20

        Mad_Matrix wrote: at the amazing speed of about 30 kbits/s That's even slower than a usual 56k modem! How do you survive!? Rickard Andersson8 Here is my card, contact me later! UIN: 50302279 E-Mail: nikado@pc.nu Interests: C++, ADO, SQL, Winsock, 0s and 1s

        R Offline
        R Offline
        Rohit Sinha
        wrote on last edited by
        #4

        I get 6-7kbps if I am lucky. Normally I get somewhere from 2-5kbps, on bad days it's even less than that. So my 56kbps modem is actually 5-6kbps.
        Regards,

        Rohit Sinha

        Do not wait for leaders; do it alone, person to person.
        - Mother Teresa

        D 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          I'm doing some updates to my XP via Windows Update. It is working so fast that I've almost felt asleep... :zzz: For 32Mb of downloads it is working for hours (at the amazing speed of about 30 kbits/s :omg: ). I have no speed problems when going to other sites, so the problem really is with Windows Update. Thank god I do all my programming in another machine, or else I don't know how I could explain to my boss "Yes, I know, I'm sitting here watching the screen for about 4 hours, but I'm just waiting for the updates to finish download..." :-D Has anyone else noticed problems with Windows Update today?

          S Offline
          S Offline
          stephen woolhead
          wrote on last edited by
          #5

          Get your IT people to install a SUS server, it will cache the updates localy for you, much faster. Stephen

          L J 2 Replies Last reply
          0
          • R Rickard Andersson20

            Mad_Matrix wrote: at the amazing speed of about 30 kbits/s That's even slower than a usual 56k modem! How do you survive!? Rickard Andersson8 Here is my card, contact me later! UIN: 50302279 E-Mail: nikado@pc.nu Interests: C++, ADO, SQL, Winsock, 0s and 1s

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #6

            Please note that I was getting that speed (thank god that it has finished the download now, even though one of the updates failed to download :mad: ) only from the Windows Update site. Anywhere else I choosed to go, I've got the normal speed (I have 512 kbit/s on cable). Thank god that I'm not on dialup any more... My phone company would like very much that I stayed about 4 1/2 hours online (just to get those damned updates) :-D

            R 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              You know you could still use the machine while it is downloading the updates. Just a thought! Joel VssConnect - Remote SourceSafe(r) Access http://www.voxcode.com[^]

              L Offline
              L Offline
              Lost User
              wrote on last edited by
              #7

              Yes, I know... But, as I said, I work mostly in another machine and this one is just for testing and net access. I just kept the IE window in a small corner of the screen and cursed every time I clicked a link in an e-mail and IE warned me that I was going away form the update and he was going to cancel the download if I insisted in going to other page. (It's been a day of select-link, copy-link, open another IE, paste-link :( )

              R 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • S stephen woolhead

                Get your IT people to install a SUS server, it will cache the updates localy for you, much faster. Stephen

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #8

                Not good for me, unfortunatly :(( I'm working from home and the company that I work with doesn't like to give much access to the local network from the outside... Oh, well... It's the first time this happens to me... Let's hope that it's the MS servers that are starting to celebrate easter... :rolleyes:

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • R Rohit Sinha

                  I get 6-7kbps if I am lucky. Normally I get somewhere from 2-5kbps, on bad days it's even less than that. So my 56kbps modem is actually 5-6kbps.
                  Regards,

                  Rohit Sinha

                  Do not wait for leaders; do it alone, person to person.
                  - Mother Teresa

                  D Offline
                  D Offline
                  Domenic Denicola
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #9

                  Rohit  Sinha wrote: So my 56kbps modem is actually 5-6kbps. You may want to differentiate between bits per second and bytes per second.


                  -Domenic Denicola- [CPUA 0x1337] “I was born human. But this was an accident of fate—a condition merely of time and place. I believe it's something we have the power to change…”

                  R 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • S stephen woolhead

                    Get your IT people to install a SUS server, it will cache the updates localy for you, much faster. Stephen

                    J Offline
                    J Offline
                    John M Drescher
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #10

                    What is a SUS server? John

                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • D Domenic Denicola

                      Rohit  Sinha wrote: So my 56kbps modem is actually 5-6kbps. You may want to differentiate between bits per second and bytes per second.


                      -Domenic Denicola- [CPUA 0x1337] “I was born human. But this was an accident of fate—a condition merely of time and place. I believe it's something we have the power to change…”

                      R Offline
                      R Offline
                      Rohit Sinha
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #11

                      Oops. Yes of course I meant KBps instead of kbps.
                      Regards,

                      Rohit Sinha

                      Do not wait for leaders; do it alone, person to person.
                      - Mother Teresa

                      D 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • R Rohit Sinha

                        Oops. Yes of course I meant KBps instead of kbps.
                        Regards,

                        Rohit Sinha

                        Do not wait for leaders; do it alone, person to person.
                        - Mother Teresa

                        D Offline
                        D Offline
                        Domenic Denicola
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #12

                        Ya, but what I meant was that your modem says 56 Kbps, but your download speed is measured in KBps (or, more familiar I would imagine, KB/s). So really a modem of 56 Kbps, which is actually 53 for some random reason, gives 53 / 8 = 6.625 KB/s.


                        -Domenic Denicola- [CPUA 0x1337] “I was born human. But this was an accident of fate—a condition merely of time and place. I believe it's something we have the power to change…”

                        R R 2 Replies Last reply
                        0
                        • L Lost User

                          Please note that I was getting that speed (thank god that it has finished the download now, even though one of the updates failed to download :mad: ) only from the Windows Update site. Anywhere else I choosed to go, I've got the normal speed (I have 512 kbit/s on cable). Thank god that I'm not on dialup any more... My phone company would like very much that I stayed about 4 1/2 hours online (just to get those damned updates) :-D

                          R Offline
                          R Offline
                          Rickard Andersson20
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #13

                          Mad_Matrix wrote: I have 512 kbit/s on cable Wow that's much better than 30kbit/s! :) Soon I can say bye bye to my ISDN and say welcome to ADSL 0,5Mbit/s!!!!!!!! No minute rate or slow ~7kb/s anymore! Just ~$32/month and perhaps 60kb/s!!!! Rickard Andersson8 Here is my card, contact me later! UIN: 50302279 E-Mail: nikado@pc.nu Interests: C++, ADO, SQL, Winsock, 0s and 1s

                          L 1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • D Domenic Denicola

                            Ya, but what I meant was that your modem says 56 Kbps, but your download speed is measured in KBps (or, more familiar I would imagine, KB/s). So really a modem of 56 Kbps, which is actually 53 for some random reason, gives 53 / 8 = 6.625 KB/s.


                            -Domenic Denicola- [CPUA 0x1337] “I was born human. But this was an accident of fate—a condition merely of time and place. I believe it's something we have the power to change…”

                            R Offline
                            R Offline
                            Rohit Sinha
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #14

                            OK, but I have seen it go as high as 13-14 KBps sometimes, but this is a bit rare. But you are right about modem speed being in kbps and the download speed in KBps.
                            Regards,

                            Rohit Sinha

                            Do not wait for leaders; do it alone, person to person.
                            - Mother Teresa

                            S 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • D Domenic Denicola

                              Ya, but what I meant was that your modem says 56 Kbps, but your download speed is measured in KBps (or, more familiar I would imagine, KB/s). So really a modem of 56 Kbps, which is actually 53 for some random reason, gives 53 / 8 = 6.625 KB/s.


                              -Domenic Denicola- [CPUA 0x1337] “I was born human. But this was an accident of fate—a condition merely of time and place. I believe it's something we have the power to change…”

                              R Offline
                              R Offline
                              Rickard Andersson20
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #15

                              Domenic [Geekn] wrote: 56 Kbps Isn't it 56Kbits and not 56Kbps? :) Not that I want to be Mr. Perfect or so... but... :) Rickard Andersson8 Here is my card, contact me later! UIN: 50302279 E-Mail: nikado@pc.nu Interests: C++, ADO, SQL, Winsock, 0s and 1s

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • R Rohit Sinha

                                OK, but I have seen it go as high as 13-14 KBps sometimes, but this is a bit rare. But you are right about modem speed being in kbps and the download speed in KBps.
                                Regards,

                                Rohit Sinha

                                Do not wait for leaders; do it alone, person to person.
                                - Mother Teresa

                                S Offline
                                S Offline
                                Steve McLenithan
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #16

                                Rohit  Sinha wrote: as high as 13-14 KBps sometimes Not possible. What you have seen is a misreport. While windows is waiting for you to choose a filename for a download, it has already started downloading it and then misreports the speed at which it is downloading for a few seconds until it "realizes" its mistake.

                                Steve McLenithan
                                Is Bert Evil?

                                R R R 3 Replies Last reply
                                0
                                • S Steve McLenithan

                                  Rohit  Sinha wrote: as high as 13-14 KBps sometimes Not possible. What you have seen is a misreport. While windows is waiting for you to choose a filename for a download, it has already started downloading it and then misreports the speed at which it is downloading for a few seconds until it "realizes" its mistake.

                                  Steve McLenithan
                                  Is Bert Evil?

                                  R Offline
                                  R Offline
                                  Rickard Andersson20
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #17

                                  Steve McLenithan wrote: While windows is waiting for you to choose a filename for a download, it has already started downloading it Coool! I never knew that! ;) Now I know why I download in 30Kb/s every 2-3 seconds with my ISDN! Rickard Andersson8 Here is my card, contact me later! UIN: 50302279 E-Mail: nikado@pc.nu Interests: C++, ADO, SQL, Winsock, 0s and 1s

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • S Steve McLenithan

                                    Rohit  Sinha wrote: as high as 13-14 KBps sometimes Not possible. What you have seen is a misreport. While windows is waiting for you to choose a filename for a download, it has already started downloading it and then misreports the speed at which it is downloading for a few seconds until it "realizes" its mistake.

                                    Steve McLenithan
                                    Is Bert Evil?

                                    R Offline
                                    R Offline
                                    Rohit Sinha
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #18

                                    Oooh, I didn't know that. Thanks for the info. :)
                                    Regards,

                                    Rohit Sinha

                                    Do not wait for leaders; do it alone, person to person.
                                    - Mother Teresa

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • R Rickard Andersson20

                                      Mad_Matrix wrote: I have 512 kbit/s on cable Wow that's much better than 30kbit/s! :) Soon I can say bye bye to my ISDN and say welcome to ADSL 0,5Mbit/s!!!!!!!! No minute rate or slow ~7kb/s anymore! Just ~$32/month and perhaps 60kb/s!!!! Rickard Andersson8 Here is my card, contact me later! UIN: 50302279 E-Mail: nikado@pc.nu Interests: C++, ADO, SQL, Winsock, 0s and 1s

                                      L Offline
                                      L Offline
                                      Lost User
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #19

                                      Rickard Andersson8 wrote: Soon I can say bye bye to my ISDN and say welcome to ADSL 0,5Mbit/s!!!!!!!! You can't imagine how your net attitude will change ;) When I was on dialup (56 Kbits/s), I always checked the size of the downloads and was always looking to the clock to check how much time I was online. A download of 3Mb would made me think twice if I really need that file. Since I've got cable, with no more timed access and with 8 Gb/month of downloads, I just don't care anymore if the file is big or small :) I just download it and keep on going... Just to give you an example: Two years ago, I decided to try Linux and asked a friend of mine to get me the Debian 2.0 CDs (3 cds). Some months ago, Debian released version 3.0 and I didn't think twice on downloading the full set of cds (7 cds with Linux and applications). I just kicked getright and let it work without worries :cool:

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • J John M Drescher

                                        What is a SUS server? John

                                        S Offline
                                        S Offline
                                        stephen woolhead
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #20

                                        SUS = Software Update Services http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/windowsupdate/sus/default.asp Will not handle things like IE or MediaPlayer, but will deal with most other patches for you, and is a bargin at the price (free). Windows OS only, for things like Exchange and SQL Server look at UpdateExpert or Hfnetchk Stephen

                                        J 1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • S stephen woolhead

                                          SUS = Software Update Services http://www.microsoft.com/windows2000/windowsupdate/sus/default.asp Will not handle things like IE or MediaPlayer, but will deal with most other patches for you, and is a bargin at the price (free). Windows OS only, for things like Exchange and SQL Server look at UpdateExpert or Hfnetchk Stephen

                                          J Offline
                                          J Offline
                                          John M Drescher
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #21

                                          Thank You. This could help a lot. John

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups