Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Who called it "malloc()"...

Who called it "malloc()"...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
javascriptcloudcsharplinqcom
16 Posts 12 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

    And not "see_you_later_allocator()"? I'll allocate my coat and deallocate myself now.

    Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

    CPalliniC Offline
    CPalliniC Offline
    CPallini
    wrote on last edited by
    #3

    You're free to rename it.

    "In testa che avete, Signor di Ceprano?" -- Rigoletto

    In testa che avete, signor di Ceprano?

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

      And not "see_you_later_allocator()"? I'll allocate my coat and deallocate myself now.

      Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

      R Offline
      R Offline
      RickZeeland
      wrote on last edited by
      #4

      I would name it Callow La Vita[^] :-\

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

        And not "see_you_later_allocator()"? I'll allocate my coat and deallocate myself now.

        Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

        M Offline
        M Offline
        megaadam
        wrote on last edited by
        #5

        Oi!! No programmin' questions here!

        "If we don't change direction, we'll end up where we're going"

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

          In a while, blockodile!

          "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

          Sander RosselS Offline
          Sander RosselS Offline
          Sander Rossel
          wrote on last edited by
          #6

          while (true)
          {
          var a = "dile";
          }

          In a while-block, a dile!

          Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

            And not "see_you_later_allocator()"? I'll allocate my coat and deallocate myself now.

            Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

            F Offline
            F Offline
            Fueled By Decaff
            wrote on last edited by
            #7

            I would call it bob_hope()

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

              And not "see_you_later_allocator()"? I'll allocate my coat and deallocate myself now.

              Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

              D Offline
              D Offline
              Daniel Pfeffer
              wrote on last edited by
              #8

              Nothing wrong with the name, but I would have made the side-effects of dereferencing a NULL return value much more [spectacular](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZhUnSOBTbM8). :)

              Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.

              G 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

                And not "see_you_later_allocator()"? I'll allocate my coat and deallocate myself now.

                Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

                H Offline
                H Offline
                honey the codewitch
                wrote on last edited by
                #9

                đŸ˜¡đŸ˜¡đŸ˜¡đŸ˜¡

                To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

                  And not "see_you_later_allocator()"? I'll allocate my coat and deallocate myself now.

                  Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

                  T Offline
                  T Offline
                  trønderen
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #10

                  We made some software where new object were created by GOD - the General Object Dispenser.

                  D D 2 Replies Last reply
                  0
                  • T trønderen

                    We made some software where new object were created by GOD - the General Object Dispenser.

                    D Offline
                    D Offline
                    dandy72
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #11

                    I'm sure the coding style would result in a religious war.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • T trønderen

                      We made some software where new object were created by GOD - the General Object Dispenser.

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      DRHuff
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #12

                      Could have just gone with Allahc!

                      If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.

                      G 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • D Daniel Pfeffer

                        Nothing wrong with the name, but I would have made the side-effects of dereferencing a NULL return value much more [spectacular](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZhUnSOBTbM8). :)

                        Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.

                        G Offline
                        G Offline
                        Gary R Wheeler
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #13

                        Daniel Pfeffer wrote:

                        I would have made the side-effects of dereferencing a NULL return value much more spectacular

                        CRASH! isn't spectacular enough for you?

                        Software Zen: delete this;

                        D 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • D DRHuff

                          Could have just gone with Allahc!

                          If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.

                          G Offline
                          G Offline
                          Gary R Wheeler
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #14

                          I knew that one was coming. Of course y'all realize you're goin' to hell in a not-particularly-comfortable handbasket, now don't ya?

                          Software Zen: delete this;

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • G Gary R Wheeler

                            Daniel Pfeffer wrote:

                            I would have made the side-effects of dereferencing a NULL return value much more spectacular

                            CRASH! isn't spectacular enough for you?

                            Software Zen: delete this;

                            D Offline
                            D Offline
                            Daniel Pfeffer
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #15

                            That's only relevant to protected-memory O/Ses (most of them, these days, I'll grant). Running on good old DOS, you could easily read (and sometimes write) to NULL, while your program went off into hyperspace. If every NULL reference cost the perpetrator money out of pocket (e.g. if the computer literally crashed and burned), I'm sure that software quality would have been much higher.

                            Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.

                            G 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • D Daniel Pfeffer

                              That's only relevant to protected-memory O/Ses (most of them, these days, I'll grant). Running on good old DOS, you could easily read (and sometimes write) to NULL, while your program went off into hyperspace. If every NULL reference cost the perpetrator money out of pocket (e.g. if the computer literally crashed and burned), I'm sure that software quality would have been much higher.

                              Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.

                              G Offline
                              G Offline
                              Gary R Wheeler
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #16

                              Daniel Pfeffer wrote:

                              Running on good old DOS, you could easily read (and sometimes write) to NULL

                              Back in the day my product ran under the DOS4GW extender (just like DOOM!). In that environment I had both real-mode and protected-mode code for things like interrupt services in order to reduce unnecessary mode switches. Dereferencing NULL meant different things happened depending on which mode you were in. My hindsight has cataracts, so good times.

                              Software Zen: delete this;

                              1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              Reply
                              • Reply as topic
                              Log in to reply
                              • Oldest to Newest
                              • Newest to Oldest
                              • Most Votes


                              • Login

                              • Don't have an account? Register

                              • Login or register to search.
                              • First post
                                Last post
                              0
                              • Categories
                              • Recent
                              • Tags
                              • Popular
                              • World
                              • Users
                              • Groups