Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Who called it "malloc()"...

Who called it "malloc()"...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
javascriptcloudcsharplinqcom
16 Posts 12 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • OriginalGriffO OriginalGriff

    In a while, blockodile!

    "I have no idea what I did, but I'm taking full credit for it." - ThisOldTony "Common sense is so rare these days, it should be classified as a super power" - Random T-shirt AntiTwitter: @DalekDave is now a follower!

    Sander RosselS Offline
    Sander RosselS Offline
    Sander Rossel
    wrote on last edited by
    #6

    while (true)
    {
    var a = "dile";
    }

    In a while-block, a dile!

    Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

      And not "see_you_later_allocator()"? I'll allocate my coat and deallocate myself now.

      Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

      F Offline
      F Offline
      Fueled By Decaff
      wrote on last edited by
      #7

      I would call it bob_hope()

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

        And not "see_you_later_allocator()"? I'll allocate my coat and deallocate myself now.

        Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

        D Offline
        D Offline
        Daniel Pfeffer
        wrote on last edited by
        #8

        Nothing wrong with the name, but I would have made the side-effects of dereferencing a NULL return value much more [spectacular](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZhUnSOBTbM8). :)

        Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.

        G 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

          And not "see_you_later_allocator()"? I'll allocate my coat and deallocate myself now.

          Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

          H Offline
          H Offline
          honey the codewitch
          wrote on last edited by
          #9

          đŸ˜¡đŸ˜¡đŸ˜¡đŸ˜¡

          To err is human. Fortune favors the monsters.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • Sander RosselS Sander Rossel

            And not "see_you_later_allocator()"? I'll allocate my coat and deallocate myself now.

            Best, Sander Azure DevOps Succinctly (free eBook) Azure Serverless Succinctly (free eBook) Migrating Apps to the Cloud with Azure arrgh.js - Bringing LINQ to JavaScript

            T Offline
            T Offline
            trønderen
            wrote on last edited by
            #10

            We made some software where new object were created by GOD - the General Object Dispenser.

            D D 2 Replies Last reply
            0
            • T trønderen

              We made some software where new object were created by GOD - the General Object Dispenser.

              D Offline
              D Offline
              dandy72
              wrote on last edited by
              #11

              I'm sure the coding style would result in a religious war.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • T trønderen

                We made some software where new object were created by GOD - the General Object Dispenser.

                D Offline
                D Offline
                DRHuff
                wrote on last edited by
                #12

                Could have just gone with Allahc!

                If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.

                G 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D Daniel Pfeffer

                  Nothing wrong with the name, but I would have made the side-effects of dereferencing a NULL return value much more [spectacular](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZhUnSOBTbM8). :)

                  Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.

                  G Offline
                  G Offline
                  Gary R Wheeler
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #13

                  Daniel Pfeffer wrote:

                  I would have made the side-effects of dereferencing a NULL return value much more spectacular

                  CRASH! isn't spectacular enough for you?

                  Software Zen: delete this;

                  D 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • D DRHuff

                    Could have just gone with Allahc!

                    If you can't laugh at yourself - ask me and I will do it for you.

                    G Offline
                    G Offline
                    Gary R Wheeler
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #14

                    I knew that one was coming. Of course y'all realize you're goin' to hell in a not-particularly-comfortable handbasket, now don't ya?

                    Software Zen: delete this;

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • G Gary R Wheeler

                      Daniel Pfeffer wrote:

                      I would have made the side-effects of dereferencing a NULL return value much more spectacular

                      CRASH! isn't spectacular enough for you?

                      Software Zen: delete this;

                      D Offline
                      D Offline
                      Daniel Pfeffer
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #15

                      That's only relevant to protected-memory O/Ses (most of them, these days, I'll grant). Running on good old DOS, you could easily read (and sometimes write) to NULL, while your program went off into hyperspace. If every NULL reference cost the perpetrator money out of pocket (e.g. if the computer literally crashed and burned), I'm sure that software quality would have been much higher.

                      Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.

                      G 1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • D Daniel Pfeffer

                        That's only relevant to protected-memory O/Ses (most of them, these days, I'll grant). Running on good old DOS, you could easily read (and sometimes write) to NULL, while your program went off into hyperspace. If every NULL reference cost the perpetrator money out of pocket (e.g. if the computer literally crashed and burned), I'm sure that software quality would have been much higher.

                        Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows. -- 6079 Smith W.

                        G Offline
                        G Offline
                        Gary R Wheeler
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #16

                        Daniel Pfeffer wrote:

                        Running on good old DOS, you could easily read (and sometimes write) to NULL

                        Back in the day my product ran under the DOS4GW extender (just like DOOM!). In that environment I had both real-mode and protected-mode code for things like interrupt services in order to reduce unnecessary mode switches. Dereferencing NULL meant different things happened depending on which mode you were in. My hindsight has cataracts, so good times.

                        Software Zen: delete this;

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        Reply
                        • Reply as topic
                        Log in to reply
                        • Oldest to Newest
                        • Newest to Oldest
                        • Most Votes


                        • Login

                        • Don't have an account? Register

                        • Login or register to search.
                        • First post
                          Last post
                        0
                        • Categories
                        • Recent
                        • Tags
                        • Popular
                        • World
                        • Users
                        • Groups