Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. There Are 2503 Users Online

There Are 2503 Users Online

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
adobehelpquestion
24 Posts 14 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • R Roger Wright

    There are 14 new posts in the past couple of hours. What the heck are the other 2489 users doing that sucks up so much bandwidth? This is not a complaint, but a matter of curiosity. We were infested with bots a while back, downloading the entire site or parts of it, and that forced Chris to limit downloads to subscribed members. Have those bots returned with valid accounts? Do we need to put a cap on how many downloads an individual user is allowed per day? Would doing so really inconvenience any legitimate users of the site? Would it help, without incurring the cost of more servers and bandwidth? "My kid was Inmate of the Month at Adobe Mountain Juvenile Corrections Center" - Bumper Sticker in Bullhead City

    C Offline
    C Offline
    ColinDavies
    wrote on last edited by
    #15

    Can someone explain to me how the 2489 users etc calculated ? Regardz Colin J Davies

    *** WARNING *
    This could be addictive
    **The minion's version of "Catch :bob: "

    It's a real shame that people as stupid as you can work out how to use a computer. said by Christian Graus in the Soapbox

    R 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • H Heath Stewart

      Good idea, so long as the forums aren't capped (I'd go nuts if I could post replies in the C# forum...and I'm sure there's those that would go nuts if they couldn't "lounge"!). Of course, a limit on stupid questions in any forum would be a handy - but difficult - feature. :)

      Microsoft MVP, Visual C# My Articles

      R Offline
      R Offline
      Roger Wright
      wrote on last edited by
      #16

      Text posts don't consume much bandwidth in either direction. I don't see any reason to limit them at all. But if people are using automated tools to suck the site dry at regular intervals, that imposes a huge load. I don't think it would be all that hard to write a program or script to add an intitial logon to a bot program, and just wonder if that's what has been going on. If it is, then a cap of downloading, say, 6 articles' project files per day probably would not inconvenience anyone who is seriously using this site. But it would block huge transfers that could have a serious impact in performance for the rest of us. "My kid was Inmate of the Month at Adobe Mountain Juvenile Corrections Center" - Bumper Sticker in Bullhead City

      H 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • C ColinDavies

        Can someone explain to me how the 2489 users etc calculated ? Regardz Colin J Davies

        *** WARNING *
        This could be addictive
        **The minion's version of "Catch :bob: "

        It's a real shame that people as stupid as you can work out how to use a computer. said by Christian Graus in the Soapbox

        R Offline
        R Offline
        Roger Wright
        wrote on last edited by
        #17

        Well, one way would be: Sub Session_OnStart Application.Lock Application("CurrentUsers") = Application("CurrentUsers") + 1 Application.UnLock End Sub Sub Session_OnEnd Application.Lock Application("CurrentUsers") = Application("CurrentUsers") - 1 Application.UnLock End Sub "My kid was Inmate of the Month at Adobe Mountain Juvenile Corrections Center" - Bumper Sticker in Bullhead City

        C A 2 Replies Last reply
        0
        • R Roger Wright

          Well, one way would be: Sub Session_OnStart Application.Lock Application("CurrentUsers") = Application("CurrentUsers") + 1 Application.UnLock End Sub Sub Session_OnEnd Application.Lock Application("CurrentUsers") = Application("CurrentUsers") - 1 Application.UnLock End Sub "My kid was Inmate of the Month at Adobe Mountain Juvenile Corrections Center" - Bumper Sticker in Bullhead City

          C Offline
          C Offline
          ColinDavies
          wrote on last edited by
          #18

          HUh, :wtf: does that mean ? While my PC is on (24/7) I have at least one CP page open. Does that still make me a User even when seated on the dunny? Regardz Colin J Davies

          *** WARNING *
          This could be addictive
          **The minion's version of "Catch :bob: "

          It's a real shame that people as stupid as you can work out how to use a computer. said by Christian Graus in the Soapbox

          R 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • R Roger Wright

            Well, one way would be: Sub Session_OnStart Application.Lock Application("CurrentUsers") = Application("CurrentUsers") + 1 Application.UnLock End Sub Sub Session_OnEnd Application.Lock Application("CurrentUsers") = Application("CurrentUsers") - 1 Application.UnLock End Sub "My kid was Inmate of the Month at Adobe Mountain Juvenile Corrections Center" - Bumper Sticker in Bullhead City

            A Offline
            A Offline
            Andy Brummer
            wrote on last edited by
            #19

            Close, but it doesn't work for a cluster. That counts users per system which would be roughly 1/6th of the total in this case.


            I can imagine the sinking feeling one would have after ordering my book, only to find a laughably ridiculous theory with demented logic once the book arrives - Mark McCutcheon

            R 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R Roger Wright

              There are 14 new posts in the past couple of hours. What the heck are the other 2489 users doing that sucks up so much bandwidth? This is not a complaint, but a matter of curiosity. We were infested with bots a while back, downloading the entire site or parts of it, and that forced Chris to limit downloads to subscribed members. Have those bots returned with valid accounts? Do we need to put a cap on how many downloads an individual user is allowed per day? Would doing so really inconvenience any legitimate users of the site? Would it help, without incurring the cost of more servers and bandwidth? "My kid was Inmate of the Month at Adobe Mountain Juvenile Corrections Center" - Bumper Sticker in Bullhead City

              A Offline
              A Offline
              Andy Brummer
              wrote on last edited by
              #20

              Well, I expect they are all reading my articles :rolleyes: Well, most of the pages on the site are bigger then the downloads. Example so, the problem is more likely the crawl on the asp pages themselves, and the contention on the database and web servers.


              I can imagine the sinking feeling one would have after ordering my book, only to find a laughably ridiculous theory with demented logic once the book arrives - Mark McCutcheon

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • R Roger Wright

                There are 14 new posts in the past couple of hours. What the heck are the other 2489 users doing that sucks up so much bandwidth? This is not a complaint, but a matter of curiosity. We were infested with bots a while back, downloading the entire site or parts of it, and that forced Chris to limit downloads to subscribed members. Have those bots returned with valid accounts? Do we need to put a cap on how many downloads an individual user is allowed per day? Would doing so really inconvenience any legitimate users of the site? Would it help, without incurring the cost of more servers and bandwidth? "My kid was Inmate of the Month at Adobe Mountain Juvenile Corrections Center" - Bumper Sticker in Bullhead City

                M Offline
                M Offline
                Matt Newman
                wrote on last edited by
                #21

                Everybody is sitting at there computers with an orange glow cast upon their faces thinking, damnit why doesn't anyone post something. Matt Newman
                What is your malfunction? - Dangeresque, too?

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • C ColinDavies

                  HUh, :wtf: does that mean ? While my PC is on (24/7) I have at least one CP page open. Does that still make me a User even when seated on the dunny? Regardz Colin J Davies

                  *** WARNING *
                  This could be addictive
                  **The minion's version of "Catch :bob: "

                  It's a real shame that people as stupid as you can work out how to use a computer. said by Christian Graus in the Soapbox

                  R Offline
                  R Offline
                  Roger Wright
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #22

                  If you're sitting on the dunny more than 20 minutes, your session will end, and the counter will decrement. If you click on a link, a new session will be started, and the counter will be incremented. That's assuming, of course, that it works at all. Session variables, in my experience, often don't and I expect no better from Application variables. "My kid was Inmate of the Month at Adobe Mountain Juvenile Corrections Center" - Bumper Sticker in Bullhead City

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • A Andy Brummer

                    Close, but it doesn't work for a cluster. That counts users per system which would be roughly 1/6th of the total in this case.


                    I can imagine the sinking feeling one would have after ordering my book, only to find a laughably ridiculous theory with demented logic once the book arrives - Mark McCutcheon

                    R Offline
                    R Offline
                    Roger Wright
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #23

                    True, but I was simplifying it for illustrative purposes. I've never worked with a cluster, and would have no idea how to attack the problem in such a case. That's a whole new can of worms. "My kid was Inmate of the Month at Adobe Mountain Juvenile Corrections Center" - Bumper Sticker in Bullhead City

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • R Roger Wright

                      Text posts don't consume much bandwidth in either direction. I don't see any reason to limit them at all. But if people are using automated tools to suck the site dry at regular intervals, that imposes a huge load. I don't think it would be all that hard to write a program or script to add an intitial logon to a bot program, and just wonder if that's what has been going on. If it is, then a cap of downloading, say, 6 articles' project files per day probably would not inconvenience anyone who is seriously using this site. But it would block huge transfers that could have a serious impact in performance for the rest of us. "My kid was Inmate of the Month at Adobe Mountain Juvenile Corrections Center" - Bumper Sticker in Bullhead City

                      H Offline
                      H Offline
                      Heath Stewart
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #24

                      While it's pretty easy to POST to the logon script, it's even easier to attach an existing cookie to every request if they already have one. Just FYI. Another idea might be an interval cap, like 4 or 5 in an hour, though that'd be a little harder to implements (since you'll need an accurate and reliable time server of some sorts and a running tally of downloads). I do agree, though, that in most cases 6/day (or something like that) is pretty accomodating.

                      Microsoft MVP, Visual C# My Articles

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups