MHGA -"mugga" (mugger) - Make HFT Great Again

Article wrote: but OpenAI wants to make sure it is safe. a.k.a. they want to polish the monetize strategy before bringing it to the market. M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

Ah. You could have fooled me. :) >64 It’s weird being the same age as old people. Live every day like it is your last; one day, it will be.

Man I hope they don't start getting "smart" (terribly dumb) in that way. The core problem is still basic fundamental trust in computing really, and how it's just totally misplaced, and the bottom line is you're trusting a computer or a person. I think only a fool should choose the former because that's just doubling risk and actually trusting both the computer AND the person who made it do.. whatever. I was about two years into one of my first programming gigs. A bunch involved MSAccess dbs and financial reporting. It slowly dawned on me that somehow I'm the one who has to make sure things are 'correct'. Like there were people taking these reports and just rolling with them. I was barely in my 20s and didn't have the experience to even know if some numbers were ballpark correct. It was absolutely terrifying. Because I realized that no, this wasn't at all a unique situation to me/that company, the same scenario was playing out basically the world over.

Here's hoping someone at Microsoft will send this to the European Commission as this is a blatant violation of GDPR. Slack/SalesForce has sued Microsoft in the EC over Teams and this could easily be used to return the favor.

"O" might be non-KSS too. :rolleyes: M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

And you needed an "AI" to find it out? :doh: M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

"Hey Google! Design Large Language Model that will be more powerful than Microsoft's new AI!" This is going to end well! :laugh: :laugh: :laugh: Our Forgotten Astronomy | Object Oriented Programming with C++ | Wordle solver

I am curious as well, but even more curious about AI 'improvements' for hardware. Exactly what are those improvements and how can they be used? Can I use the arithmetic logic unit (ALU) and memory unit to increase performance for non-AI algorithms? Similar to you, I am just too busy with regular work to delve into it.

Bad enough they want Skynet here, now they're suggesting SkyNetToGo? I’ve given up trying to be calm. However, I am open to feeling slightly less agitated. I’m begging you for the benefit of everyone, don’t be STUPID.

The domain data thing you bring up at the end is why I think general AI driven by LLM isn't coming anytime soon and if it does, we should probably smash it with as giant and hard a hammer as we can find.

This is impressive enough that I have my doubts about the veracity of the claims.

That actually is my short list. cheers Chris Maunder

These days an if/then statement seems to qualify as AI. There's some seriously deep, deep changes happening in the world right now. A lot of it seems to be covered in a blanket of "me toos" and re-wrapping of other's work. My bet is that AI will simply come to mean LLMs until someone (please, someone!) comes up with a better, sexier name than LLM. cheers Chris Maunder

Besides AI getting it wrong: 1) If you have concurrent writers to the queue you do not know something else does not insert a new "last" item after you checked what it is. This can of course be solved with some locking, but then we are at the next point: 2) If you do not have concurrent writers you can just capture the last item to a variable as you enqueue it.