Here a Expert Custom Web development Company

Here is something that (probably) will help you a bit more than some (not necessarily relevant) previous answer How To Install Visual Basic 6 (VB6) in Windows 10[^] You may also want to refer to this video, which provides an alternative method for a successful installation on Windows 11. How to install Visual Basic 6.0 on Windows 11 - YouTube[^] I have personally installed VB6 on Windows 10 and Windows 11 multiple times on a variety of machines, for a variety of purposes. And while it may not be a straightforward process, it can be done with minimal effort. Hope this helps.

Nice try, Jareth! :laugh: "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

You need to use the right OS for the hardware. Some computers will forever run Windows Vista better than any OS because the drivers were designed for it. Once you start upgrading Windows you run into driver emulation issues or kernel thread scheduling issues. So either you stay on the older version of Windows or you move to Linux which doesn't have these issues at a driver level.

Downloads: Generic Database Access[^] This a HUGE Codeproject article which, from the looks of things (quick scroll through the .zip content), is likely to give out many C# programming secrets wrt SQL Server (even) with no further sacrifice of time searching on your part. Generic Database Access[^]

PaulS_UK wrote: how do you attempt serious debugging in complex C++ code within your MyDLL.dll functions Any language - I use logging. Last time I did C++ I rolled my own. But googling I see Log4cxx and Log4cpp. I might go with the second but I would do more research first.

Or, struggling understanding a commit and then realizing you did it.

Thank you for your reply. I forwarded it to my host tech support.

Meanwhile GDI ans Windows Forms keep pulling 99% of desktop development. GCS/GE d--(d) s-/+ a C+++ U+++ P-- L+@ E-- W+++ N+ o+ K- w+++ O? M-- V? PS+ PE Y+ PGP t+ 5? X R+++ tv-- b+(+++) DI+++ D++ G e++ h--- r+++ y+++*      Weapons extension: ma- k++ F+2 X The shortest horror story: On Error Resume Next

new Version ... PWA vs Flutter 2024: Which Should You Choose for Development[^]

Yeah, Intelli{foo} was the new Active{foo} or Direct{foo} for a while with Microsoft. TTFN - Kent

Article wrote: .NET Upgrade Assistant can help you understand what changes will be needed. But will leave you alone when you try to port your projects to the new version M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

"Meanwhile, Microsoft routinely makes decisions that had huge consequences for customers, and they just don't care" - agreed.

I still haven't played with AI in the context of code generation very much at all. MSFT's thinking here is really good though. Models as plugins will definitely be a thing in lots of arenas. This does make me think though... Another/better thing I would be more interested in would be for them to use AI to "fuzz" the code in ways that don't make it so fuzzy as something like js min. Then open up web based collab where people who want to can 'summon the internet' for advice.

I've been tinkering with these free AI tools for a while now, specifically ChatGPT, Copilot and codepal. The only one I've tried for generating code was codepal. Not very impressed: it only generates code snippets ('functions'), and after very few such short snippets it reaches the limit for free usage. For not code related questions, I found ChatGPT far better than Copilot. It used to be really bad just a few months ago, but it significantly improved. It reaches the limit for free usage pretty fast though, requiring a few hours of timeout. Copilot is just pathetic, in my experience, at this time. Both Copilot and ChatGPT give quite often wrong answers - they don't 'realize their own mistakes', but rather admit them when pointed out, leading to 'I apologize for the confusion/misunderstanding/frustration...'. Almost never 'for the wrong answer'! They're trained well ;) What they're not trained to say is 'I don't know', which I'd prefer, instead the constantly wrong answers. I usually know the correct answer, or at least I know when the answer is wrong, but what happens if I don't? They're nice toys, but not really useful and trustworthy in my opinion. Maybe I'm not very good at asking questions (they can understand), but I do it in a very clean manner and provide enough context, so I doubt that. I would be myself impressed with any decent answers (nevermind code generation), because my expectations are pretty low, but so far I'm not. Your Mileage definitely Varies!