And that guarantees that it will not have "too many layers"?

I was going to post this. The real issue here isn't a memory management leak, it's a failure to reclaim a counted reference item, which you don't want to do as long as there's a reference to it.

CapCut allows you to export and share your edited videos directly to various social media platforms, streamlining the process of showcasing your creations to your audience

It sounds like you're creating two instances of the viewmodel. What does the PlayerHostView look like? "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

Andre Oosthuizen wrote: no, we will not be opening your entire project to try and find a solution. Plenty of others have. In theory, theory and practice are the same. But in practice, they never are.” If it's not broken, fix it until it is. Everything makes sense in someone's mind.

duh. Too many late nights Thanks In theory, theory and practice are the same. But in practice, they never are.” If it's not broken, fix it until it is. Everything makes sense in someone's mind.

Thank you Nelek

I agree 100%, have some or other way to capture this to be used in the future, irrespective of which customer adds what as their own reference. Just do a callback then to that specific customer and you should be able to tie up the reference to the correct file reference.

Article wrote: Microsoft's Insider builds often tend to reveal interesting features that are hidden from plain sight as they are not a part of the announced set of features, changes, and improvements in release notes. And that will probably be the source of some amusement in the insider news... :rolleyes: M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

You're missing the point. When you buy a third party control, like say from Infragistics, and you use it in your app, when you write your own theme the third party control respects it. I'm trying to understand how to make my control work the same way In theory, theory and practice are the same. But in practice, they never are.” If it's not broken, fix it until it is. Everything makes sense in someone's mind.

The three laws failed... and they think that this will do the job? As they say...[^] M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

Yes you just need to use a Format event handler on the Binding object For example private void AddBinding() { // Enable formatting and add the event handler Binding b = color1.DataBindings.Add("BackColor", NavBill.DataSource, "Color1", true); b.Format += PanelBackColorBinding\_Format; } private void PanelBackColorBinding\_Format(Object sender, ConvertEventArgs e) { if (e.DesiredType == typeof(Color)) { // Get the integer value from the DataColumn Int32 number = (Int32)e.Value; // Get the Color corresponding to the number // \*\*\* PUT YOUR OWN CODE HERE \*\*\* Color col = GetColor(number); // Assign the correct Color back into e.Value e.Value = col; } } Make sure that a default color is assigned to e.Value if there is any chance that the column will have missing or non convertable values.

Have you considered explaining the problem to a rubber duck? Maybe try to explain the problem to someone without any technical skills. They are likely to think about the problem in a different way unbound from the technical constraints. Best of luck. :-)

I hope it gets better! Check out my IoT graphics library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/gfx And my IoT UI/User Experience library here: https://honeythecodewitch.com/uix

You can find a solution in recommendations X.215/X.225 ... :-) We did have a standardized solution to this 40 years ago, in 1984. But it was too ambitious - you couldn't give IT students a homework assignment of implementing the OSI Session Layer. You could have them making a primitive implementation of, say, (too) Simple Mail Transfer Protocol, (too) Simple Network Management Protocol or (too) Simple File Transfer Protocol. Besides, the Internet standards were freely available, while OSI specs were copyrighted and expensive. So the Internet Protocol Suite won the war against OSI. In 1984, you may say that OSI Session was overkill (considering resources available at the time). If it had been generally available for 40 years, we certainly wouldn't have considered it overkill today. There might be running implementations out there, even today, but I don't know of any.

Quote: GetErrors method returns an IEnumerable that contains validation errors for the specified property (when the propertyName parameter isn’t equal to null or empty string) or for the entire entity (when the propertyName parameter is equal to null or empty string) If you want to validate multiple properties of your entity, you need to return the errors when the GetErrors method[^] is called with a null property name. "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer

honey the codewitch wrote: they all have to have the same sig though. Ah...I see what you mean now by the hack part.