Why Python?

[BobJanova]

Honestly Mono is probably better tested and more reliable than Microsoft's implementation.

[Cristian Amarie]

1. Why Python? Because he wants a nice job. That is, until boss will ask him to implement IRibbonCallback and IDispatchEx in Python. 2. The real question: the single big difference is this: there are languages with pointers and languages without. That's it.

[Chris Losinger]

meh. when i was in school, the primary programming language was Modula2 (basically Pascal). C was only used in some higher-level electives. but it doesn't really matter. once you learn what programming is all about, switching from one procedural language to another is trivial.

image processing toolkits | batch image processing

[BobJanova]

C family languages are in general a really poor place to start. You need to know a lot before you can get a basic program off the ground in C and not shoot yourself in the foot with an unsafe pointer, or C# and know what the framework calls are doing. Starting with a dynamic language which allows you to pick up the basic skills in writing code, designing modules and functional separation, data structures and data flow analysis without dealing with the rigours of statically typed C languages and syntax is a good idea. Yes, C#, Java and C++ (depending on the field) are where most of the jobs are. But your first lessons should no more concern themselves with that than first year maths should be teaching techniques from accountancy jobs. C family languages have 30 years of history behind them which means that they are not necessarily the most clear for teaching concepts, the easiest to set up and run or the easiest to understand.

[PIEBALDconsult]

Jörgen Andersson wrote:

could teach programming instead of a language

Hear! Hear! :thumbsup:

You'll never get very far if all you do is follow instructions.

[OriginalGriff]

PIEBALDconsult wrote:

A developer who knows only one language (especially if self-taught) is crippled.

Well said! It's also the case that learning a new language is a lot, lot quicker than learning the mind-set of programming: to a large extent the language is pretty much irrelevant (except for the final implementation)

Those who fail to learn history are doomed to repeat it. --- George Santayana (December 16, 1863 – September 26, 1952) Those who fail to clear history are doomed to explain it. --- OriginalGriff (February 24, 1959 – ∞)

[mikepwilson]

My real first language of choice is C++. But for just about everything I do (multi-platform ETL and light servers) a true scripting language is absolutely the right choice. There's so little excuse to use C++ nowadays. Makes me sad. So that pretty much means perl or python. Given that I had 15 years of perl under my belt and 2 years of python, that decided that. I won't involve myself in microsoft's toolchain unless I'm writing a gui.

[PIEBALDconsult]

Eddy Vluggen wrote:

20 years ago ... non-microsoft ... doesn't want a vendor-lock in.

Well, it was a little more than twenty years ago, but most of my college classes (at three different colleges) used VAX/VMS. I did have some classes in Turbo Pascal and Turbo C, though. Microsoft was (and is) merely an annoying upstart. :-D

You'll never get very far if all you do is follow instructions.

[W Balboos GHB]

mikepwilson wrote:

There's so little excuse to use C++ nowadays

Actually, when teaching of of the C??'s, I think C++ is a better choice than C#. Granted, C# will be easier to learn. But, at least if you're a professional, you should know what you're really doing. Eg.

This.that.somewherelse; // C#
class.value;

vs

This::that::somewherelse; // C++
class.value;
class->value;

Also methods various other similar things. You're not distinguishing a name space from the various other separation options. Fewer mistakes but less understanding in what the meaning is of what you're doing. When the pedal hits the metal. An opinion.

"The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

"As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert

"If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

[Frank R Haugen]

mikepwilson wrote:

PHP is a godawful mess, and C# is tightly platform specific.

Yes, PHP is a mess, but I like it, (I had to learn it, and I found it fantastic after a while), though nowadays I believe a "from scratch" re-writing of PHP in it's entirety might be in order. C# is no longer Windows exclusive, due to Mono, and if I understand the news coming from Microsoft, C# will get a "native" compiler, making it much more flexible. I have had a look at it, just to help my friend with some of the concepts, but I don't see the attraction. I feel this joke I heard:

Two programmers are standing at a bar talking shop, when a teen swagers over, and join the conversation. He asks the two older programmers what languages they are using. One of the guys answers: "I do OS development, mostly in C++". The other Guy answers: "I mostly do enterprise applications development in C#", The kid then says: "Coool, I myself program in Py...". In the Police report, the kid fell 14 times against the two programmers' fists.

-Sums up my attitude towards Python. But hey, arguing over programming languages, (and IDE's, text editors, code formatting, etc,), is sometimes like arguing politics :P -Frank

[SkysTheLimit]

When I was in South Africa I taught a first year university course called Fundamental Algorithmic Concepts which also included some basic programming skills. It was a school-side decision that Python was considered to be the best first language and so that's what I had to use. (We used C on Unix platforms when I took the course). I put a lot of thought into that question because it seemed to me a dumbing down of the course content. Don't get me wrong, Python is a powerful language that is not overly platform dependent and it allows feature-rich programs to be developed quickly. The problem that I have with it is that it masks a lot of the internal workings of programming languages and compilers. Syntactically, once a person knows Python, it is fairly easy to convert a Python program to C but end up with inefficient or even dangerous code as a result. I guess Python allows the instructor to abstract out just the programming aspects of the content without having to pay attention to the architecture/memory aspects of the system(s) that program is going to run on. But I think that ultimately, if your friend wants to transition to a job beyond merely coding to a spec, he would need to get familiar with some C-like language.

[jesarg]

Python is considered a great beginner programming language. People learn basic concepts in Python and then move to other languages for more advanced concepts. Everyone learns programming in little bits at a time, and Python makes the basic, early bits easy to digest.

[V 0]

Python is replacing IDL more and more in the scientific world. I know some Python and although it can be compiled I do see it more as a scripting language. It´s pretty good, well documented and quite powerful, though some getting used too. It has many libraries and apparently can plugin C++ code pretty well. (never tried it) I´m happy they learn Python instead of VBScript or something similar :p

V.
(MQOTD rules and previous solutions)

[Frank R Haugen]

Do VbScript even exist anymore? I always saw it as the "slightly more retarded" cousin of JavaScript :P

[jschell]

Frank Reidar Haugen wrote:

Why Python?

Teacher probably likes it.

Frank Reidar Haugen wrote:

but he is adamant that his teacher must be correct in saying that Python is what the programmers need today, to be hireable

When I went to university I was taught, at a very basic level, several languages. If this is a university why are they not doing that? If it is some technical school where the intent is solely to get someone working then a fixed focus single language might be better.

Frank Reidar Haugen wrote:

The real question is really: are there really any big differences between the top 15 or 20 most popular programming languages?

Definitely. C is procedural Java/C#/C++ are OO SQL itself is different than others and extensions to that are procedural (but attempting on procedural concepts is a big mistake.)

[David Crow]

Frank Reidar Haugen wrote:

But am I wrong?

It doesn't matter what you think, only that your friend use the tools/technologies offered by the instructor. Even if you are 100% right, that would not get him a passing grade. When he gets out into the real world, then he can use what he wants (per your suggestions).

"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson

"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons

"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles

[LloydA111]

I read a comment from someone who works at a company that has C# running on Mono that runs on Fortune 500 comapny servers without issue.

       .-.
      |o,o|
   ,| \_\\=/\_      .-""-.
   ||/\_/\_\\\_\\    /\[\] \_ \_\\
   |\_/|(\_)|\\\\  \_|\_o\_LII|\_
      \\.\_./// / | ==== | \\
      |\\\_/|"\` |\_| ==== |\_|
      |\_|\_|    ||" ||  ||
      |-|-|    ||LI  o ||
      |\_|\_|    ||'----'||
     /\_/ \\\_\\  /\_\_|    |\_\_\\

[Roger Wright]

And ASP was already taken...

Will Rogers never met me.

[Florian Rappl]

Mono is definitely fine.

[irneb]

Python isn't bad, especially compared to C-like languages like C#/Java. You get (out the box) at least the same libraries as you do for DotNet/JVM, and then some (as Python's own built-in libs are enormous compared to most others). The thing which Python does "really" well is the ease of using much more complicated data structures (lists, hashtables, etc. are no more complicated to use than arrays in C). Other stuff are things like a REPL (though not as perfect as Lisp/Hasskell's). Really clean code - it's sometimes referred to as an exact 1:1 translation of pseudo code. It provides some functional paradigms, but not a full fledged FP language. No strict OO - i.e. a function need not be part-n-parcel of a class. Much less code to write than C#/Java to get the same thing. OO concepts in it's imports statement, e.g. you can import an entire "package" normally, then refer to it's internals using the OO-dot-notation, or using the * wildcard to import the internals as if loaded locally, or import a single internal without the rest of the package. It has a very large community, thus mentors and examples are not difficult to find. There are some issues with Python: Dynamic typing - though this isn't necessarily a problem. But for someone coming from a C-like language you'd probably miss the explicit typing. The biggest possible issue I can see with this is some error checks are impossible which are possible in a explicitly- (C) or inferred (Haskell/F#) typed language. Though there are alternatives - e.g. PyLint. It's interpreted by default, though some of its implementations do compile. E.g. CPython compiles to pyc files on the fly (these are similar to Java's class files in that they're bytecode to be run through the PVM. Others also add high optimization (e.g. PyPy), compiling to other VM's (e.g Jython for JVM, IronPython for DotNet), and binary compiling comparable to most other languages (e.g. Nuitka). Non-pure closures, it's version of lexical scoping is a bit weird - and therefore pure FP isn't possible. But this you only notice if you're used to a full FP language (like Scheme / F# / Haskell / etc.) - you'd not notice the difference if you come from a procedural language like C. This has been alleviated a bit in Py 3 with its nonlocal keyword though. Python (as is) doesn't do multi-threading, not easily at least. But there is the multiprocess interface, easy to use, but means more RAM for processes than threads. Only single-line lambdas are possible. It's OO method's a bit "strange" in that