Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. Other Discussions
  3. The Soapbox
  4. I went to the soapbox to find lively conversation and found crickets

I went to the soapbox to find lively conversation and found crickets

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Soapbox
77 Posts 7 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Munchies_Matt

    Eddy Vluggen wrote:

    It is not according to data.

    What data? Care to provide this too?

    Eddy Vluggen wrote:

    ou can wait for an eternity for all I care

    Ah, of course. I didnt expect you to. You make statements you cant substantiate with data of any kind. Well, you know what that makes you I am sure, and you dont need me to spell it our for you.

    L Offline
    L Offline
    Lost User
    wrote on last edited by
    #68

    Munchies_Matt wrote:

    Care to provide this too?

    Already done so; free download at the KNMI. Some other countries provide similar. So, I do not provide it, since it is not "my" data; they provide it, as an aggragate of the weather stations.

    Munchies_Matt wrote:

    Ah, of course. I didnt expect you to. You make statements you cant substantiate with data of any kind.

    Always the sofist; on the contrary, I'm using data that is publicly available and used by other institutes. Your arguments here (to convince the coders!) are mostly hit-and-run stuff that can be easily be dismissed; sometimes even by your own arguments.

    Munchies_Matt wrote:

    Well, you know what that makes you I am sure, and you dont need me to spell it our for you.

    It makes me the one with the raw facts, and you the one that keeps cherry-picking to find anything that remotely can be used to create more confusion. You are putting a lot of unpaid effort in this; so who is paying for your sandwich? :)

    Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

    M 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • L Lost User

      Munchies_Matt wrote:

      Care to provide this too?

      Already done so; free download at the KNMI. Some other countries provide similar. So, I do not provide it, since it is not "my" data; they provide it, as an aggragate of the weather stations.

      Munchies_Matt wrote:

      Ah, of course. I didnt expect you to. You make statements you cant substantiate with data of any kind.

      Always the sofist; on the contrary, I'm using data that is publicly available and used by other institutes. Your arguments here (to convince the coders!) are mostly hit-and-run stuff that can be easily be dismissed; sometimes even by your own arguments.

      Munchies_Matt wrote:

      Well, you know what that makes you I am sure, and you dont need me to spell it our for you.

      It makes me the one with the raw facts, and you the one that keeps cherry-picking to find anything that remotely can be used to create more confusion. You are putting a lot of unpaid effort in this; so who is paying for your sandwich? :)

      Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

      M Offline
      M Offline
      Munchies_Matt
      wrote on last edited by
      #69

      Eddy Vluggen wrote:

      Already done so;

      Ah, the old 'already done so' gambit. Care to provide a link to your post with a link to the data? Hmm?

      Eddy Vluggen wrote:

      So, I do not provide it

      And now you admit to not providing it. Well well, you changed your mind fast!

      Eddy Vluggen wrote:

      I'm using data

      Well please provide it to substantiate your assertions. Other wise be known for being full of shit.

      L 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Munchies_Matt

        Eddy Vluggen wrote:

        Already done so;

        Ah, the old 'already done so' gambit. Care to provide a link to your post with a link to the data? Hmm?

        Eddy Vluggen wrote:

        So, I do not provide it

        And now you admit to not providing it. Well well, you changed your mind fast!

        Eddy Vluggen wrote:

        I'm using data

        Well please provide it to substantiate your assertions. Other wise be known for being full of shit.

        L Offline
        L Offline
        Lost User
        wrote on last edited by
        #70

        Munchies_Matt wrote:

        Ah, the old 'already done so' gambit. Care to provide a link to your post with a link to the data?

        Search CodeProject? Why would I give you a link I already gave you?

        Munchies_Matt wrote:

        And now you admit to not providing it. Well well, you changed your mind fast!

        Just noting that it is not "my" data, but part of the public domain.

        Munchies_Matt wrote:

        Well please provide it to substantiate your assertions. Other wise be known for being full of sh*t.

        That's your place already :)

        Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

        M 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L Lost User

          Munchies_Matt wrote:

          Ah, the old 'already done so' gambit. Care to provide a link to your post with a link to the data?

          Search CodeProject? Why would I give you a link I already gave you?

          Munchies_Matt wrote:

          And now you admit to not providing it. Well well, you changed your mind fast!

          Just noting that it is not "my" data, but part of the public domain.

          Munchies_Matt wrote:

          Well please provide it to substantiate your assertions. Other wise be known for being full of sh*t.

          That's your place already :)

          Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Munchies_Matt
          wrote on last edited by
          #71

          No, not going to cough up the data to support your assertions? Oh well, Full of Shit Eddie it will have to be then, :)

          L 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Munchies_Matt

            No, not going to cough up the data to support your assertions? Oh well, Full of Shit Eddie it will have to be then, :)

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #72

            Munchies_Matt wrote:

            No, not going to cough up the data to support your assertions?

            It is public available from the mentioned institute. If you are too lazy to look up a link I already sent you, then you could opt for a search engine. It is not hidden or anything like that :D

            Munchies_Matt wrote:

            Oh well, Full of Sh*t Eddie it will have to be then, :)

            Hehe, "moviprep"; and the name is "Eddy" :cool:

            Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

            M 1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • L Lost User

              Munchies_Matt wrote:

              No, not going to cough up the data to support your assertions?

              It is public available from the mentioned institute. If you are too lazy to look up a link I already sent you, then you could opt for a search engine. It is not hidden or anything like that :D

              Munchies_Matt wrote:

              Oh well, Full of Sh*t Eddie it will have to be then, :)

              Hehe, "moviprep"; and the name is "Eddy" :cool:

              Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

              M Offline
              M Offline
              Munchies_Matt
              wrote on last edited by
              #73

              You never sent me a link, so come on, send it now. And the other data you have said exists, but suddenly cant deliver when asked. Getting to be a bit of a pattern with you isnt it.

              L 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Munchies_Matt

                You never sent me a link, so come on, send it now. And the other data you have said exists, but suddenly cant deliver when asked. Getting to be a bit of a pattern with you isnt it.

                L Offline
                L Offline
                Lost User
                wrote on last edited by
                #74

                Munchies_Matt wrote:

                You never sent me a link, so come on, send it now.

                Oh, it is still on CodeProject; they don't throw away our conversations.

                Munchies_Matt wrote:

                Getting to be a bit of a pattern with you isnt it.

                Has been like this since we started. You come with nonsense, I explain it, you follow up with an ad-hominem.

                Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

                M 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • L Lost User

                  A single experiment is not enough to "prove" that CAGW is not real. Knowing you, it is a biased and cherry-picked piece of text, funded by some large corporation :)

                  Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

                  J Offline
                  J Offline
                  jschell
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #75

                  Eddy Vluggen wrote:

                  A single experiment is not enough to "prove" that CAGW is not real.

                  He "proves" it all the time and in many and oddly weird ways.

                  L 1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • J jschell

                    Eddy Vluggen wrote:

                    A single experiment is not enough to "prove" that CAGW is not real.

                    He "proves" it all the time and in many and oddly weird ways.

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    Lost User
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #76

                    No proof yet that stands peer-review :thumbsup:

                    Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • L Lost User

                      Munchies_Matt wrote:

                      You never sent me a link, so come on, send it now.

                      Oh, it is still on CodeProject; they don't throw away our conversations.

                      Munchies_Matt wrote:

                      Getting to be a bit of a pattern with you isnt it.

                      Has been like this since we started. You come with nonsense, I explain it, you follow up with an ad-hominem.

                      Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^] "If you just follow the bacon Eddy, wherever it leads you, then you won't have to think about politics." -- Some Bell.

                      M Offline
                      M Offline
                      Munchies_Matt
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #77

                      No, I give you well reasoned argument, backed up by solid evidence, and you jump all over the place, incapable of maintaining a consistent line of argument, and fail to provide one single link to back you up. And it is like this again and again and again. Any wonder I lose my patience with your sillyness?

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups