C++ for scan image - Google Search[^]

In most of our web services I use the repository pattern. Isolating data access from business rules from controller/services. Here is a link to some docs on Microsoft. This isn't specific to Dotnet Core, but the same pattern can still be applied.

The instructor table looks a bit odd to me, having both ID and InstructorID I would assume you meant InstructorID and InstructorName. And as an addition to what Mycroft said, in a fully normalized database you always use the same name for an entity throughout the database. It's not just a good idea, it's a standard[^]. And just like Mycroft said, for a surrogate key, using + "ID" is a good idea Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello

can you help me what i need actually insert Save the following data Name,Email,Salary,DistrictId in table Employee EmployeeId,CourseId in table EmployeeCourse EmployeeId,LanaguageId,LevelId in table EmployeeLangage and write it in Create http post [HttpPost] public ActionResult Create(Customemployee cemp) { return View(); }

You can add button control with command 'delete' in the buttons. When you click pass the id of city to be deleted to the controller. In the controller you need to receive two parameters command and id of the city. What's your issue ?

i think you are missing 'closing script tag'

don't forget: use "pre" tags to format it M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

ahmed_sa wrote: what is wrong in my code I don't know, you tell us. What's it (not) doing? What's is (not) supposed to do? Is an exception being thrown? I obviously can't know these things. I do know you don't need to call notifyDataSetChanged() since neither the array nor the adapter are changing in the onClick() method. "One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson "Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons "You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles

Thank you for reply i will post my code full in another thread and what i need to do

What David has described is a many to many relationship, an allowance can be used by many employees and an employee can have many allowances. This is the correct data structure for the requirements. Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH

I'm repeating myself here: Don't use string concatenation to build a dynamic SQL query. Your code will be susceptible to SQL Injection[^]. If you really need to use a dynamic query, use sp_executesql[^] to execute it: CREATE Procedure sp_EmployeeSelect @EmployeeName nvarchar(50) AS Declare @SQLQuery as nvarchar(2000) SET @SQLQuery = N'SELECT * from Employee Where (1=1)' If @EmployeeName <> '' Set @SQLQuery = @SQLQuery + N' AND (EmployeeName LIKE N''%'' + @EmployeeName + N''%'')' Exec sp_executesql @SQLQuery, N'@EmployeeName nvarchar(50)', @EmployeeName However, in this case, as with all of your QA questions, you don't need a dynamic query: CREATE Procedure sp_EmployeeSelect @EmployeeName nvarchar(50) AS SELECT * FROM Employee WHERE @EmployeeName = N'' Or EmployeeName Like N'%' + @EmployeeName + N'%' "These people looked deep within my soul and assigned me a number based on the order in which I joined." - Homer