For anyone who is in SharePoint or ASP.NET development, a new free add-in for Visual Studio can be found at [Codeplex]

For anyone who is in SharePoint or ASP.NET development, a new free add-in for Visual Studio can be found at [Codeplex]

For anyone who is in SharePoint development, a new free add-in for Visual Studio can be found at [Codeplex]

I almost choked. You have to pay me a new keyboard :laugh:

I wish I could send you some of the code I'm reviewing currently but I can't due to a confidentiality momerandum. The above snippet looks like an oasis to me :wtf:

Get rid of these goto statements. They produce the stack overflow. Goto is a relic in modern languages . Use a break statement as mentioned by many other people to exit the loop. Avoid by any means to use goto statements.

Wow...Just wow !!! I live for piece of crap like that... :omg: And after the laughter eventually one thing crosses my mind. "Is that man paid for his programming services ?".

radhikasharma wrote:

Label_0104: foreach (Character character in this.charSet)///Error of stack overflow execption in Charset// { foreach (CharClass class2 in classArray) { if (character.type == class2) { num17++; goto Label_0104; } } }

What's that dude ????? Are you trying to live in danger ????? If I close my eyes to the ultimate sin (aka goto) the whole situation smells like an eternal loop.

Unfortunately he owns the company... :((

Don't give him ideas...

bn2vs wrote:

and will always check their nubness level before accepting any job

During the interview sessions they demonstrated the company and theirselves as truly openminded with the need to hire an experienced developer in order to accomplish a technological breakthru and update to their major product and to deliver knowledge and guiding directives to the rest of the development team. I bite that crap then and I left from my prior company which was awesome. Actually I'm the one responsible for all the development team but he doesnt let me make any decision in technical level and in case I make a decision by myself without asking him, we finally arrive at the point of how wrong was that decision and how much did i mislead the team and how much time did i spent in the wrong direction . "I want results. Keep your theoretical background for your academic carreer". Its the main moto.

PIEBALDconsult wrote:

Those were created to sell books, unnecessary in the real world.

He doesnt read .net documentation or books. He can found it out by himself. Seriously talking now, once called me to his office to ask me what was that : Dictionary<string,string> giving me at last the advice to stay away from technological verbalisms. :wtf:

My apologies dude.

That's true.

Do you think he's a guy that can take from words ? or examples ? He is the most dogmatic and half-educated (i dont know if this term exists in english.In my country exists and its worse than uneducated) piece of crap i've ever met. For example , once i told him that i prefer to use enterprise library from microsoft than to write my own libs because its rather profound that i trust more microsoft's code than mine. The answer was : "I don't find the reason not to write our libs. Even microsoft's code is written by people...so why to trust it more than ours ?" Incredible ??? Do you get it now ?

I have to go through this s***hole. I just opened my own company and i desperately need this paycheck to cover my expenses and my company's expenses.

I'm quite embarrased. Is it so humiliating ? I tried to close my eyes to truth but it seems a third person point of view shows the harsh reality. Thanx guys.

Well...I wont share you the source code because its an enormous snippet. But i will narrate you the concept like a bedtime story. The technical director of our company - who is in parallel our head programmer (somebody save us)- decided to add a new feature to our super-dooper, high-end, wannabe-ERP product (riiiiiiiiiight!!!!). That was ... the very "advanced" requirement : "Our application will have only one instance.Listen how is going to be implemented..." .And then the problems just begun. "In order to implement it we'll take the ProcessId of our .exe and a timestamp of DateTime. Now to ensure its a today's instance of a process and save it to the database. So every new instance of the program will check the database to ensure if it will execute or not". I asked him very politely "What about using a mutex ?" . I almost got fired because : "You don't pay attention to the requirements and your only concern is to show off to me and to the rest of the development team with theoretical buzz-words. This is real-life programming buddy. Can you do this or not ?". No comments from me. I leave them to you. I'll keep the dissappointment. P.S. (1) The same day he forbid me to use again datasets, or LinQ to SQL because they are too complicated, too time consuming to construct, they don't ensure data integrity (???), and they oblige us to stick with a certain schema and "... I don't understand the reason for a disconnected architecture". So from now and on he commanded me to use only text queries through custom dbcommands and keep a database connection alive in a static object. (Hell yeah!!!) P.S. (2) All the above are real. :((

modified on Wednesday, May 27, 2009 3:54 AM

Yep...and i need the code to be rich. Anyone interested to share it for free and let me live as a happy and lazy parasite ?

5 minutes !!!! No Comments. :omg: