Thanks! :thumbsup: Yes, you did understand the second part correctly. I have a sensor that is supplying data over ethernet that needs to be displayed on the screen. It reports intensity in HSL values, one strip at a time, kind of like a flatbed scanner. I am making a GUI element that displays this data in a waterfall like display (thus the FIFO stack).
Working on a digital signal processing article. :) (My first article on this site)
Hello. I am fairly new to C# programming, (I am trying to teach myself), and I would like to know how to make custom (either WinForms, or WPF) components. The components that I am trying to make need to be fairly efficient, as I want to repaint them at least 30 times a second (with new data to display each time). I am fine with using unsafe code blocks if they are needed. The data that is going to be displayed is in the form of 1-dimensional HSL (Hue Saturation Luminescence) pixel data. I want to show a moving display of this data, a graphical FIFO stack (one that discards the first inputs upon overflow).
Working on a digital signal processing article. :) (My first article on this site)
You can still use a bootable USB flash drive (though you still need to burn a CD). Step 1. Download and Install the Windows 7 USB download tool. CNET download page Step 2. Use the Windows 7 USB download tool with your Win 8 iso to make your flash drive bootable. Step 3. Download the Plop Boot manager. http://www.plop.at/en/bootmanager.html Step 4. Burn plpbt.iso to a CD Step 5. Insert bootable flash drive and Plop CD Step 6. Use Plop bootloader to boot your USB drive. Step 7. Install Win 8. Step 8. Enjoy Windows 8 developer preview. I have done this, and it does work. (The Windows 7 USB download tool does not work correctly if you are trying to burn the x64 iso to your drive while using a x32 OS) (There are other ways to make the drive bootable, but they require at least the temporary use of a x64 machine)
Well, it still shows that something landed on the moon. Even if it wasn't necessarily human, it still shows that we could get something up there in one working piece.
What about the Apollo 11 & 15 laser retro-reflectors? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Laser_Ranging_experiment[^] If you have a powerful enough laser and telescope, you might be able to see the reflection. (and according to the article, the soviets sent up two reflectors themselves. So, if the landings were fake why wouldn't they say anything?) These reflectors are mostly used for range finding: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apache_Point_Observatory_Lunar_Laser-ranging_Operation[^]
Wow! I had NO idea that to a virus specific synapses could be distinguished from one another! :P Do you even know how a neural network works, or even what a synapse is?
Are there any routers out there (with a factory default firmware) that can encrypt different connections with different implementations of encryption(WPA, WPA2, WEP)? With all of the routers that I know of, the routers encryption is only as strong as the weakest implementation that connects to it. What if you could have a different level of encryption for each device? For example: you have a very old laptop that only has WEP, but you have a newer computer that can do WPA2 and you communicate more sensitive information (ie. online banking) on it. With the current implementation, the router has to encrypt all data with the lower encryption (WEP) and the banking info (or similar) can be more easily "sniffed" from the air. But, if your router could have several levels of encryption, then the more sensitive data could use a more secure connection and the older computer could still connect to the router. Obviously, this would make it easier to connect to the router over the weaker encryption instead of the stronger, but if there were were more stringent connection restrictions on the router (MAC address filtering, etc.) for the weaker encryption then it could be made more secure. All forms of encryption and access control can be beaten eventually. Why make your overall system less secure if there are only a few devices that are on your network that don't support the higher encryption? (This message posted by my very old laptop that does not support WPA, and only has 0.25 gb of RAM :~ )
Well, it depends on how much you want to pay for your IMU. There are some really tiny one chip integrated triple axis accelerometers and triple axis gyros. Or, from hobby electronic stores you can buy custom boards like this one: Sparkfun electronics 6-DOF IMU
How about a wireless bridge? Something like a linksys WET610N. Have the bridge connect to your new ISP over G, then plug it in to your network like you do your current modem. [isp]--> WiFi)))) (((Bridge--->[local network ie. your switch connecting your comps.]
I will be upgrading my system soon, but I am keeping XP until the HD dies. (Which will be soon, the "SMART" features are saying that failure is imminent) At which point its a RAM upgrade, new HD, and new OS. (edit, A license key would be very much appreciated, Thank you!) (The monitor is a nice size, considering that I have two of them hooked up (the browser only reports the one that its currently open on))
modified on Wednesday, July 21, 2010 5:50 PM
Not only do they now have your IP address, they now know what operating system you use, what browser and which version. All of this information is sent by your browser. For example, this is what any site can log about my browsing history:
Your User Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US) AppleWebKit/533.4 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/5.0.375.99 Safari/533.4
Your Screen Resolution is: 1280 x 1024
You are running from version 5 of Netscape
Your Operating System Platform is Windows XP Home
If you were so paranoid about sharing your "Private" information, then you shouldn't use any web browsers, or anything that connects to any network. That includes cell phones too.