The boy Paul wrote:
the reigns of the environmental movement
Well, the nearest to reigning that the environmental movement will ever get is when Prince Charles makes it to the throne. Speaking of which, what's this malarky?
The boy Paul wrote:
Think Prince Charles and his insistence that the proles not be allowed to take baths as he lounges in the luxuriant splendor of royal palaces.
Which links to:
Price Charles said:
Snub the tub. If everybody in a four-person family replaced one bath a week with a five-minute shower, you could save between £5 and £15 per year off your energy bill.
His insistence that the proles not be allowed to take baths? I suppose that the boy Paul knows that he can lie with impunity because none of Jones' sheeple would ever think for themselves, and actually check the veracity of the article. Another lie: "the debate between the 'liberals' over at the Guardian website in response to this story did not revolve around a castigation of this authoritarian future hell, but a question of whether old people should merely be advised by government workers how to kill themselves when they reach 65, or whether the state should just kill them directly" Which turns out to be two out of 96 comments, both ironic. (One even ended "Sorry, this was intended as irony, just in case I end up giving the LibDems any ideas." He hadn't reckoned with it being read by lying InfoWars zealots.) The rest were a debate, which included castigation of a future authoritarian hell. BTW: Four visions of city life in 2040, yet the boy Paul has censored the other three. Do they not fit his vision of an Eco-Nazi hell?
2011 - Our best hope is that things will be frightening and dangerous rather than desperate and horrific. Jesse's Café Américain