John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
- The price is outrageously high
No, it's not. If you want a brand new license for the top-of-the-line, home-theater-running version, it's 400 bucks. If you don't need the Ultimate version (most people don't) or are upgrading, it can be considerably less. And there hasn't been a paid upgrade for a non-server MS operating system in 5 years.
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
- Almost everyone has to buy new hardware to run it, especially if you want the aero stuff.
I'm running Vista (which I prefer to XP) on two machines, neither of which were purchased within the last year. Admittedly, one of them was among the more powerful machines you could get at the time, but the other one is a run-of-the-mill workstation and it runs Vista (with glass) just fine. If you're talking about the folks that upgraded their Windows 98 machines to XP, then yes, they will certainly need to upgrade their hardware. But there are a lot of folks who've purchased new machines the last 12-18 months who are good to go.
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
- Horror stories regarding the UAC has considerably dampened end-user adoption.
The reality of UAC is fas from horrific, though. A lot of people are still reacting to the UAC behavior from Beta 1. Like the new Apple commercial with the security guard. Sure, it's funny, but it's not based in reality.
John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:
and it doesn't help that Vista sucks so bad.
It must suck to have everything suck so bad.
if(!curlies){ return; }