I wouldn't want to miss rights-managment, NTFS and all the other functions that work only with special flags under W95/98/ME (or are completely disabled).

I only support >= Win2K.

Clickety.I choose a random iterator type, but they all behave the same.

I'm sorry, I forgot they implemented the operator-> too (argh! operator overloading begins to suck ;)

As long as they don't smash into it infront your right.

Every movement needs a transformation of energy. I don't believe a penny would stick in the cement if you through it of the ESB. If it would the american cement would be kind of crap ;)!

Yes but '->' won't work at all! You cannot change operator precedence at all, that's correct. a+++++b ;)

ESB height: 381 m Penny weight: 1g (?) Energy in penny on top of the ESB: m*g*h = 0,001 kg * 9,81 m / s^2 * 381 m = 3,73761 J Now this is the energy inside the penny to engrave the street. hmmm 4 joule? I think your breakfeast has more power in it :-D. Just kiding!

A satellite may weight 1-5 tons I guess. A asteriod can be as big as our moon or bigger (Pluto is seen as a kind of asteriod by many scientists). So the mass of most asteroids that could be dangerous for us is so high that it's like throwing stones against mountains.

iterator is a struct. now operator* returns the value (if I understood that right). so you need it.operator*().menuItem or (*it).menuItem. This has nothing to do with any pointer syntax.

Alright. Throw a stone against earth and measure how much it moves out of it's original orbit.... Scientists! X|

Correct :D! Altough I believe the questioner ment D).

Looking into the MSDN can open eyes! iterator overloads operator*. plain and simple. Somehow the STL trys to use references wherever possible.

If your PC is fast enough try quake3 -r_allowsoftwaregl 1 :-D. Let's see, um how fast :))...

I still stick to Quake 1 :rose:. It runs almost everywhere, and has a software mode (of course) and a gl exe too. You can find the demo and winquake.exe at ftp.idsoftware.com.

You tricked us a bit, he ;)? Well use the table-layout: fixed property. That should do it.

With a very fast algoithm, with more CPU power and some knowledge this can become a problem for RSA. Sure now it's still save, but in 5 years?

The end of RSA?

I forgot: Iieks! This guy claims to code on 14 platforms???? Sheesh when you take C then you can code on almost every platform available ;P. I can code on 98% of all existing systems :D!

This guy has never implemented a PE loader! Your app may (but most often won't) be remapped to any address and how in the world do I get the address of my code in a restricted process? You would have to write a custom PE loader and use MapViewOfFileEx with lpBaseAddress = null to allocate the code at (hopefully) a random position. Or maybe using LoadLibraryEx twice with different flags (does this work?). But you could still kill the app of course... Hehe, hijacking an X server would surely kill you at coding time :D, too complex for average windows coders.