Why do you respond to posts that you don't ever read? My point is that the current administration will not hesitate to manipulate the truth for political gain. Why is that not clear? Rob Graham wrote: What the heck did the current administration have to do with how the Brits handled the situation? Are you actually suggesting that GWB told Tony (while Tony was off on Vacation) how to handle all this? The second article even states that the decision as to how to proceed was left up to the British home secretary. ??? Clearly you are not reading what I am writing and are responding to what you wish that I said. Rob Graham wrote: Sure is hard to tell, given the way you trot out the party talking points at every opportunity. The only talking points seem to be in your head. That seems to be what you are responding to, not to what I actually said. No eternal reward will forgive us now for wasting the dawn. - Jim Morrison

:laugh::laugh: Carry on Carry On.Your calling name exercise is actually hurting YOU not me and If you idiot thinks that abusing me WOULD make you RESPECTABLe then you are really an imaginary moron.Carry on.I woudnt mind at all:rolleyes: I am rather glad you are in pain while abusing me ;)

Looks like their voting machines are so much more unforgiving than our machines. When was the last time you poured some wine for you and your sweetie and went out on the front porch to watch the geometry frolic on the lake?--Rebecca M. Riordan, Designing Effective Database Systems

Not saying he's right, just explaining his argument.

Clickety[^] Have fun, one voters. I posted this just for you. Definition of 'Liberal': A person who is so open minded that their brains have fallen out.

dennisd45 wrote: By his own admission, he was calling the man a sh*thead. Since when is calling someone a shithead considered being racist? Perhaps I missed a memo or two, but do enlighten me.

Thanks for the info. No eternal reward will forgive us now for wasting the dawn. - Jim Morrison

Hey, I'm happy to stand along side evil-doing good guys such as FDR and Lincoln, Churchill, etc for the purpose of this argument. If you wish to make good impotent in defending itself from evil, I will always take the other side. Nothing nuanced about it. Thank God for disproportional force.

dennisd45 wrote: BTW it is an instance, not static, property. Doh! Of course, it doesn't make sense for it to be static. Sorry about that. :doh: :josh: My WPF Blog[^]

jan larsen wrote: No, I know. All the people I know who've worked at a US office says the same: Extremely long working hours with low efficiency. Well I don't beleive that that is true with the exception of possibly the larger IT companies. I know of only one person who developed a nervous disorder that was wotk related but he wqs a big time worrier anyway. I personally have been in the business sice 1982 and other than genetic related hair loss :) am not seemingly affected. jan larsen wrote: nyway, if you really want to draw in the GDP per capita, then this is the list for 2005[^], it seems that the GDP per Capita in Denmark is higher thatn in the US... I got my figured here: https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/us.html#Econ[^] https://www.cia.gov/cia/publications/factbook/geos/da.html#Econ[^] The PPP figures are "supposed" to be a more accurate picture. Suppose you were an idiot... And suppose you were a member of Congress... But I repeat myself. --Mark Twain

What a bunch of wussies ;-P I'm kept awake at night by the sounds of anthracite screaming. Fold with us! ¤ flickr