So my experience is that C++ rocks compared to Java if the program has just seconds of execution time. (See also the test that you posted) However, Java overtakes the lead after a half minute of execution time. I think this is because of optimization of the JVM. I have to say I have no idea about C# since I am only working on Unix systems. Cheers
You have the thought that modern physics just relay on assumptions, that somehow depends on a smile of a cat, which isn’t there.( Albert Einstein)
21 is just half of the truth.
You have the thought that modern physics just relay on assumptions, that somehow depends on a smile of a cat, which isn’t there.( Albert Einstein)
Hi, So I am coding CUDA stuff since a year now. I started to program the examples that they showed in their documentation. I found that really helpful. I also liked this article : [^] Actually, I would not recommend any of the books, because the documentation from Nvidia is enough, but maybe it helps you. Have fun, cheers
You have the thought that modern physics just relay on assumptions, that somehow depends on a smile of a cat, which isn’t there.( Albert Einstein)
Nice one!! Thanks
You have the thought that modern physics just relay on assumptions, that somehow depends on a smile of a cat, which isn’t there.( Albert Einstein)
That was a good one! :laugh:
You have the thought that modern physics just relay on assumptions, that somehow depends on a smile of a cat, which isn’t there.( Albert Einstein)
Yes, I was wondering too
You have the thought that modern physics just relay on assumptions, that somehow depends on a smile of a cat, which isn’t there.( Albert Einstein)
If you have to stick to the two pointer of char in order to concat them. You have to creat a new char * with the length of both. Then copy both to the one. I would suggest using stings. You could also create a string and use += to do it. I guess that is your homework, isn't it? Sounds like. Cheers
You have the thought that modern physics just relay on assumptions, that somehow depends on a smile of a cat, which isn’t there.( Albert Einstein)
Why not use a string type? There you can check easily. However, if you have to use a char *, then you have to care about setting the pointer to NULL or to a '\0' char. this would be the end of a string. As you like. The cleaner version, I would say, would be to use a string object. Cheers
You have the thought that modern physics just relay on assumptions, that somehow depends on a smile of a cat, which isn’t there.( Albert Einstein)
Actually the only reply he needs is: ask google :) Cheers
You have the thought that modern physics just relay on assumptions, that somehow depends on a smile of a cat, which isn’t there.( Albert Einstein)
You to. I am also nearly out! Cheers
You have the thought that modern physics just relay on assumptions, that somehow depends on a smile of a cat, which isn’t there.( Albert Einstein)
Why would you want that?
You have the thought that modern physics just relay on assumptions, that somehow depends on a smile of a cat, which isn’t there.( Albert Einstein)
Hi, You might also post the code above. I think (based on error C2334 ) you missed ': or {'; somewhere. At least google tells you that: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/f0swb231.aspx[^] Cheers
You have the thought that modern physics just relay on assumptions, that somehow depends on a smile of a cat, which isn’t there.( Albert Einstein)
No prob, I just thought you might have not. http://support.microsoft.com/kb/195738[^] This was just the first hit that I got and I thought it might help. Cheers
You have the thought that modern physics just relay on assumptions, that somehow depends on a smile of a cat, which isn’t there.( Albert Einstein)
Suggestions from secrete tool google: http://www.google.at/search?client=firefox-a&rls=org.mozilla%3Aen-US%3Aofficial&channel=s&hl=de&source=hp&q=fatal+error+C1001%3A+INTERNAL+COMPILER+ERROR&meta=&btnG=Google-Suche[^] Cheers
You have the thought that modern physics just relay on assumptions, that somehow depends on a smile of a cat, which isn’t there.( Albert Einstein)
Yes
You have the thought that modern physics just relay on assumptions, that somehow depends on a smile of a cat, which isn’t there.( Albert Einstein)
I have to say a very good one!!! thanks
You have the thought that modern physics just relay on assumptions, that somehow depends on a smile of a cat, which isn’t there.( Albert Einstein)
We in our work named then according to dead scientists. My working Pcs are called Einstein, Podolsky, Rosen (The experiment :) ) Cheers
You have the thought that modern physics just relay on assumptions, that somehow depends on a smile of a cat, which isn’t there.( Albert Einstein)
Hi I think I would go for a observer program that checks if there is one more job that can be started. If so I would start one. If you want you can do a importance weighting schema based on the assumed run time. I don't know if this answer your question. but this is the direction I would tend to go. Cheers
You have the thought that modern physics just relay on assumptions, that somehow depends on a smile of a cat, which isn’t there.( Albert Einstein)
A very very very big cluster :). And then several of them :). Have a nice weekend cheers
You have the thought that modern physics just relay on assumptions, that somehow depends on a smile of a cat, which isn’t there.( Albert Einstein)
I am sure that are CPU time measurements. Calculate it into years, then you will see. :) However they must have amazing Pcs. Cheers
You have the thought that modern physics just relay on assumptions, that somehow depends on a smile of a cat, which isn’t there.( Albert Einstein)