Should also be noted that after going into Mobile site, after clicking on link it reverts to the normal site again, not the idea I would have thought ;P

I like the idea of having the user select what options they would like when they sign up, but there may be obstacles to overcome. One would be that many users just sign up to get at an article download real quick, and forcing them to go through more overhead may reduce adoption rates. It would be neat to reserve a section of each page (e.g., the section that is currently reserved for ads) to present the user with those questions, so they could answer them whenever they happened to notice them. And once they've answered those questions (e.g., "would you like to disable programming language detection when you paste"), then that section of the page could be again given back to whatever it is temporarily replacing (or could be shown only half of the time, if replacing a section of the page is not desirable). [Forum Guidelines]

Yes sir. I'll add it to the bug list.

SELECT id FROM details WHERE id = ( SELECT A.detail_id FROM ( SELECT detail_id, COUNT(detail_id) view_count FROM views WHERE (TO_DAYS(NOW()) - TO_DAYS(viewed_on)) <= 2 GROUP BY detail_id ORDER BY view_count DESC LIMIT 1 ) A ); Regards, Arun Kumar.A

So did I - all of my sisters are in or past their 40's. .45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly ----- "Why don't you tie a kerosene-soaked rag around your ankles so the ants won't climb up and eat your candy ass..." - Dale Earnhardt, 1997 ----- "The staggering layers of obscenity in your statement make it a work of art on so many levels." - J. Jystad, 2001

...alcoholic jelly and ice cream seems like a great idea for lunch on a weekday. :rolleyes: Anna :rose: Tech Blog | Visual Lint "Why would anyone prefer to wield a weapon that takes both hands at once, when they could use a lighter (and obviously superior) weapon that allows you to wield multiple ones at a time, and thus supports multi-paradigm carnage?"

fly904 wrote: Technically, that guy was done for Copyright. Only because the Japanese didn't ahve any other appropriate law onn the books. The do now. fly904 wrote: One a year for the last ten years? Does that sound like a system that works? It's about the same as the copyright prosecution rate. Given the difficulty of tracking down the perp, then actually proving authorship/release (most succeed because some friend turned), it's not that bad. Some end up being prosecuted for the other crimes committed (identity theft, mail fraud) and the virus authorship is hardly mentioned, since it was just a means to the larger crime.

Checking each forum for whether or not *you* have a new message in there is too much load. Sorry :( cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP

Luc Pattyn wrote: it took me a while to discover it has two modes, it does not tell, nor does it tell which mode it is in In design mode you are editing WYSIWYG. It should be very, very obvious that you have formatted text, images, layout etc. In source mode you see plain text in Courier New and lots of HTML tags. It's the usual HTML mess. BTW1: Some things we get for free in WYSIWYG mode because browsers give it to us. Some of these things are hard to implement within HTML mode. Some things we simply haven't implemented. BTW2: In Q&A yes, there is WYSIWYG, Edit and preview. Preview gives you a final sanity check and will colourise code snippets. cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP

fly904 wrote: as compair (compare? It's pronounced funny). That would be compère (from the French for Godfather). Ah! I notice you're a student, in Reading ...

Blue Bulls? Go Bokke! :)

Really? Give me lobster any day Roger, I'm not big on pork If the post was helpful, please vote, eh! Current activities: Book: Devils by Fyodor Dostoyevsky Project: Hospital Automation, final stage Learning: Image analysis, LINQ Now and forever, defiant to the end. What is Multiple Sclerosis[^]?

Thanks for reporting. Working on it now. Fixed and will be available soon on live. Sorry for inconvenience. Sincerely, Elina Life is great!!! Enjoy every moment of it! :-O modified on Tuesday, August 18, 2009 9:39 AM

Granted. I was shouting no at the TV, if that counts. If at first you don't succeed, you're not Chuck Norris.

Bantams make bloody good spatchcock. Never underestimate the power of human stupidity RAH

If they are identical there is a check in place. I've seen it occasionally when I hit a time out. The European Way of War: Blow your own continent up. The American Way of War: Go over and help them.

harold aptroot wrote: Maybe this is why my BMI is 15.8 Sorry. Lost interest. I don't like German cars. I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

Ennis Ray Lynch, Jr. wrote: I don't think pseudo-science entertainment shows belong on the discovery channel. Being an entertainment show, they obviously don't go through the whole double-blind control group experiment with results verified by independent researchers, etc. thing that is the hallmark of "real" science, but I don't recall them ever pretending to be anything other than an entertainment show. So it's hardly fair to expect them to conduct their experiments in such a way as to pass peer review. Or should we also go around to elementary school science fairs and find a student to verbally eviscerate because his experiment on growing bean sprouts at various light levels has an insufficient p-value? The label of "pseudo-science" belongs to dishonest scams like Ghost Hunters and John Edward, not those shows legitimately try to popularize simplified, but still quite real, science.

I was hoping to get a fix in place before you noticed :-O Fixed locally, will upload to live this afternoon. Fixed. cheers, Chris Maunder The Code Project Co-founder Microsoft C++ MVP modified on Friday, June 12, 2009 4:51 PM