‭011111100010‬ wrote: I think I asked you a question and you did not answer it Incorrect. I implied the answer to your question was very evident. All you had to do was read the exchange to understand. History is the joke the living play on the dead.

Ian Bell, #2 wrote: You persist in demanding evidence and yet appear oblivious to the extensive, meticulous and methodical research that revisionists have conducted to support the rational and common sense conclusions they draw. Apparently you are unaware of the "extensive, meticulous and methodical research" that has been going on for at least 40 years to prove that extraterrestrials are on the earth. Apparently you are unaware of the "extensive, meticulous and methodical research" that has been going on for hundreds of years to prove that the earth is flat. On my part I am aware of both of those. And contrary to what you are claiming I have read some of the holocaust revisionism. Not do mention stuff on any number of other crackpot theories. And every single one is taking existing evidence, evidence that contradicts their view, and attempting to rewrite it to fit their view. Which is what I said. Ian Bell, #2 wrote: You reinforce my impression that you do really do not know the other side of this story and are simply parroting criticisms You are incorrect.

Racism (formal definition), sexism, ageism, religious bigotry (either because of type or whether it is there or not), nationality bigotry, sexual orientation bigotry, disability discrimination.

A_Griffin wrote: as editor fall over themselves to give a voice to people who are basically idiots but demand to be heard in the name of “balance” That is a very good point. A_Griffin wrote: or that others have an obligation to listen to you More importantly you do not have a right to be heard.

Snarkieness is not the problem ;P Bastard Programmer from Hell :suss: If you can't read my code, try converting it here[^]

Exactly. :thumbsup: There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data. There are only 10 types of people in the world, those who understand binary and those who don't.

Yeah, no, I got that. I was just giving my opinion on the topic. We're reaching a point where WW2 was far enough in the past that 'historical tomfoolery' is possible, since those that were actually alive at the time are becoming fewer and fewer. This is both unfortunate (reduces accurate accounts) and fortunate (we can begin to explore the situation from different angles without upsetting as many people.) I never thought about it from the angle of it being akin to religious indoctrination. As you say, if accurate, it would be quite interesting indeed.

Kinda obligatory, here...[^] I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

Our apologies. Chris tells me he will getting to it as soon as he can. Thanks, Sean Ewington CodeProject

Working in Windows, thankfully, if what you say it true... :)

My apologies and I will do so in the future. To be honest, I routinely scan the comments in the news section and, given the abundance of off-topics, assumed my comment was just as appropriate in the news sections as the lounge section. Thanks for the correction and I'll keep this in mind for the next time. Cheers!

To include images you need to first upload them (drag and drop them onto the area of the wizard for file uploads) then you can reference them in your article using <img src="image.png"> Where image.png is the filename of your image. Don't add any path info - the wizard will fix all of that up for you. In the list of images you've uploaded, just to the left of the image name, is a small arrow icon which, when clicked, will insert the image at the current cursor location. cheers Chris Maunder