Sorry for overlooking the detail when I pasted the code. But my original attempt included "|". I just tried now instantiating "perm" object like below: var perm = new FileIOPermission(FileIOPermissionAccess.Write, directory); But still no luck. - Malhar

Yup.. there was a great startup article .. this solved the problem! http://osdir.com/ml/windows.devel.dotnet.general/2002-05/msg00446.html[^] - MS

Obviously Apple have to maintain their relationship with AT&T. AT&T would not like hacked iPhones getting $100 rebates. AT&T are pissed off enough with Apple for allowing the iPhone to be hacked so easily. So Apple must have consulted with AT&T on this rebate and AT&T wanted it this way. And Apple end up paying less in the end because they know that owners of hacked iPhones have less of a leg to stand on in complaints. We aren't exactly going to phone Apple and say "I hacked my iPhone, how do I get my $100?" It isn't illegal but it isn't exactly kosher either. Anyone pissed off about this has a very immature understanding of life. They paid the money, they shouldn't expect money back. regards, Paul Watson Ireland & South Africa Andy Brummer wrote: Watson's law: As an online discussion of cars grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving the Bugatti Veyron approaches one.

Marco Turrini wrote: And I believe you are missing the point, the starting one, to be precise. I replied to Jeremy Fowler I could have sworn, that your original point, was the following.... Marco Turrini wrote: Using char(1) for a boolean is stupid enough, ... 3) Using [var]char introduce wide possibilities for unnecessary errors and runtime exceptions. I don't see anything that qualifies that statement with something about reports that export those values directly. Marco Turrini wrote: Although I appreciated your thouroghly lesson above, I can't understand what this has to do with defending the use of a char data type for boolean value: In point of fact I don't really see why it matters whether one chooses one or the other. Either can lead to problems when used incorrectly. When used correctly neither will. Marco Turrini wrote: But if I have such a layer, why shouldn't I use a bit data type in the database to express boolean values? And why should insist on using a bit type and assert that the alternative is contemptible (which 'stupid' suggests.) Marco Turrini wrote: I find that using a char(1) could be preferable just in two circumstances: And as far as I can see the only arguments for that point of view are one of the following: 1. A very, very limited market segment which should be driven by marketing not technological reasons. 2. A very, very flawed architecture which requires that data types flow throughout the system.

Excellent, thank you, that's very helpful! Yesterday they said today was tomorrow but today they know better. - Poul Anderson

What you can do is have an instance of T as a member variable, and use 'is' on that. C++ templates were certainly more powerful, but, realistically, most people used them in the ways that generics are now used. Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++ Metal Musings - Rex and my new metal blog "I am working on a project that will convert a FORTRAN code to corresponding C++ code.I am not aware of FORTRAN syntax" ( spotted in the C++/CLI forum )

nope

malharone wrote: But there are cases when from you non-generic class, you want to call a generic method and all you want do is to pass the "current type" and not any other type. Whenever you need to do this, this is the way to write your call: ( CurrentType )InstanceReference.Method( args )

You are right, but the "Equals" method is not overridden and the TreeListColumn is using the base (object.Equals) method. (Not that it matters) But the value returned GetHashCode() is also the same for both the objects. - Malhar

malharone wrote: the ClientConsole as a WinExe application hmm.. I could do that.. I should do that given the constraints

Oh look, cute little birdy gets burnt to a crisp in roaring searing flames Think how much money they are spending on this crap. I wish they'd spent it on building WinFS instead... cheers, Chris Maunder CodeProject.com : C++ MVP

malharone wrote: I wonder if Google will now encourage the shortcuts! I think you forgot to put the joke icon

Suprisingly, Britney is still married. :laugh: Edbert Sydney, Australia

Andrew Vincent wrote: Didn't you know: when using a MAC everything you type is "perfect!" :laugh: I'd love to help, but unfortunatley I have prior commitments monitoring the length of my grass. :Andrew Bleakley:

:laugh: QRZ? de WAØTTN

DavidCrow wrote: Mr. Brown makes the statement that his novel is based on facts. Exactly. Based on. If there are two true things in the novel and the rest is fiction then it can be said to be "based on facts". Chill out about it, believers will believe regardless of how mad religion is shown to be, unbelievers wouldn't believe even if god appeared and told them the winning lottery numbers.

Darn straight it's not free. You will not easily find a good control for free in this area of graphic control. Especially when you get into programmatic construction of the grids with flow lines properly drawn.

What's happening to the market? Apple supporting Windows and Microsoft Virtual Server supporting Linux!