I would recommend the one i'm most comfortable with. Since this person probably will ask me a lot of question when he/she/*he start learning. :)

Sorry, my english is bad beta!

I agree with you. But i guess he just misunderstood this: "...This is really a Q&A question. Once you ask there, you will then be notified to use Google...." for "Don't bring any questions here on CP."

Sorry, my english is bad beta!

Well, when someone post a question on Q&A you could just get the title and redirect him to Let Me Google That For You[^].

Sorry, my english is bad beta!

All i could read was: Two witches had two watches. Wit wit wit wit wat? wit wat wat wit wit?

Sorry, my english is bad! Everything is easy for the man who doesn't have to do it himself. (Fran Porretto)

Now makes sense why people on my work look at me like some kind of Voodoo maker.

Sorry, my english is bad! Everything is easy for the man who doesn't have to do it himself. (Fran Porretto)

:thumbsup: No way i could live anymore without my kids.

Sorry, my english is bad! Everything is easy for the man who doesn't have to do it himself. (Fran Porretto)

Tank you.

Fran Porretto wrote:

(Besides, a lot of Americans don't have much command of English, either. Not that that's something we're proud of, mind you.)

Same here in Brazil, sometimes it looks like we are heading to a Newspeak.

Sorry, my english is bad! Everything is easy for the man who doesn't have to do it himself. (Fran Porretto)

Yep. Marriage is a relationship between two people where one is always right and the other is the husband.

Sorry, my english is bad! Everything is easy for the man who doesn't have to do it himself. (Fran Porretto)

Fran Porretto wrote:

"Everything is easy for the man who doesn't have to do it himself."

Good for a signature. Do you mind? I have seen this happen. Some years ago i worked in a system that have to produce reports to a specific client, so, one day a sales person come to us and said that we have to add a lot of new data to the report and so she told us: "This is easy, you just have to do a select grouping everything. I DON'T KNOW HOW TO DO THIS, BUT IT'S EASY"

Sorry, my english is bad!

Out of the System - Jennie Bomb - Sahara Hotnights If i'm right, blame google. And tell if i have broken the rules.

Sorry, my english is bad!

Try this

//Use the selector you want
$('button').click(function(e){
e.stopPropagation();

//your code

})

if what you need on mouseover/mouseleave is just change css, do it using css

/* Normal State*/
.highlight{
border-left: #FFF;
background-color:#FFF;
}

/*Hover State*/
.highlight:hover {
border-left: #FF9900;
background-color:#FAFAFA;
}

Sorry, my english is bad!

Use jQuery Sortable

$( "#sortable1, #sortable2" ).sortable({
     connectWith: ".connectedSortable";
}).disableSelection();

Just make sure to give your "columns" the class "connectedSortable". for reference: http://jqueryui.com/sortable/#connect-lists[^]

Sorry, my english is bad!

"Back to the Flu"?

Sorry, my english is bad!

Brady Kelly wrote:

I am currently busy with trying to find a mechanism to make a non-form, i.e. a sub-form (not allowed, but is a group of inputs and a URL) post via AJAX.

You could just create a JSON and pass it to the server in the "data" field of a jQuery.ajax request. If you are using C# with Webservices you could do this: (Using jQuery)

$.ajax({
url: "your.url.here/Method",
type: "POST",
data: {json:{a:10,b:20}},
contentType: "application/json; charset=utf-8",
dataType: "json",
success: function (data) {
var response = $.parseJSON(data.d);

           }

});

wich in server will be

public string Method(object json){
//do your stuff here
}

or

$.ajax({
url: "your.url.here/Method",
type: "POST",
data: {a:10,b:20},
contentType: "application/json; charset=utf-8",
dataType: "json",
success: function (data) {
var response = $.parseJSON(data.d);

           }

});

and server-side

public string Method(int a, int b){
//do your stuff here
}

Sorry, my english is bad!

nope.. what have to be done is set "property" not evaluate its value.

Sorry, my english is bad!

Rage wrote:

No rule without exception.

This is a rule, so it has an exception, then no every rule has a exception.

Sorry, my english is bad!

Totally agree I don't think myself as the best coder in the world, there's a lot i need to learn(a better english, for example).

harold aptroot wrote:

That's not too bad. Bad, certainly, but I'm not impressed yet. You said this isn't the worst - what is?

Quote:

pagination using a foreach and 2 counters?

I wish it was the worst... did you mind making pagination using a foreach and 2 counters?

I was looking into some code at work and came across this valueReturn = ( 3 * 60 ).ToString(); and something like this object.Property = true ? "1":"0"; and just want to know, why...

Sorry, my english is bad!