You're correct. There is somewhat of a constraint on the aspect ratio (x/y), but also some flexibility. Meaning it doesn't need to be 50%, but 10% or 90% are probably too much. But no hard limit.
rbuchana
Posts
-
algorithm to place N rectilinear blocks in a ring to minimize total area -
algorithm to place N rectilinear blocks in a ring to minimize total areaDoor #3... image — ImgBB[^] Difficult to explain words, but the idea is to have a rectangle in the middle with no protusions. Coordinates/sizes are not discrete.
-
Chili-Heads Out There ?You are right... canning is an ordeal. I've tried this: Habanero Death Dust — Oakridge BBQ - Serious BBQ Rub[^] and it was good. You could use it as a starting point for your own personal "death dust"
-
Chili-Heads Out There ?I think the Habanero jelly idea is a great one. I love spicy foods as well; and have tried Habanero jelly. It was fantastic! I had it on lamb and pork, but can imagine it would be delicious on a great many foods. You can always try a small batch of jelly - it doesn't sounds like you're in Habanero rationing mode.
-
algorithm to place N rectilinear blocks in a ring to minimize total areaImagine having ‘N’ rectilinear blocks of varying sizes. 'N' can be any number (< 1000); and of different but similar sizes. See here... blocks — ImgBB[^] I need an algorithm that will place these in a “ring” fashion, such that the area is minimized. White spaces or blank spaces within the ring are fine. Ring picture... ring — ImgBB[^] The constraints are… Each rectilinear block must be placed Minimize the area (x*y) Create a ring such as below Ring implementation Note that my two pictures don't align exactly, meaning not all the blocks in the first picture are placed in the second. These pictures are only provided as reference/examples. I’m not a computer scientist by trade. This would seem to be a cost optimization problem, by I’m having a problem wading through the many optimization algorithms out there. Any guidance on which algorithm would be viable? Thanks!
-
excellent article on the life of the inventor of "information theory," Claude ShannonIf you're interested in Shannon, then I highly recommend this [^] book.
-
Which part of CMOS did they not understand?That is incorrect. CMOS circuits still consume current, even when they are not switching. It's commonly referred to as leakage, and is well understood. There are many sources of leakage in CMOS circuits, but the most common is subthreshold leakage. Generally speaking, this leakage gets worse as technology gets smaller, but - in recent years - has been mitigated against with fin-FET technologies.
-
Samsung go boomHappened to us. It took out our dryer as well. Samsung support was terrible until my wife called them out publicly on facebook. They finally reimbursed us months after it went out.
-
Any Matlab folk here ?Use it almost every day.
-
Android Phone Won't ChargeI've had charging issues due to subpar USB cables. Have you tried a different cable?
-
3D Graphing Package, Microsoft MathematicsNot with a push of a button, but certainly with a small (or large-ish) m-file. Post the equation somewhere. It can't be the worst equation in the world.
-
3D Graphing Package, Microsoft Mathematics -
It appears there's something worse than math...Along this content lines??? http://complextoreal.com/tutorials/#.U3Yz3_ldVjI[^]
-
It appears there's something worse than math...There are a lot of websites available. What specifically are you studying?
-
Modern day RAM, static or dynamic?Most static RAM bits are implemented using back to back inverters and two t-gates. Thus 6-transistors for a single bit, hence called 6T SRAM bit cell.
-
Finally done itThere's not a computer I use that doesn't have the caps lock key mapped to the control key. Although I'm an emacs guy, so I use the control key extensively.
-
Visual Basic for mAsochists (VBA)You can turn off the message box via Tools->Options->Auto Syntax Check
-
At last Microsoft adds "Direct Compute AKA DirectX 11 Compute" to Office 2010 [modified]I'm using 2007.
-
At last Microsoft adds "Direct Compute AKA DirectX 11 Compute" to Office 2010 [modified]No special settings. Just my defaults. I'm using an HP Color Laser as well (model 3800).
-
At last Microsoft adds "Direct Compute AKA DirectX 11 Compute" to Office 2010 [modified]I agree. It's awesome. No more Latex for writing specifications & such. Printed for me just fine.