Ok I get it. Better to totally stuff it up once and then exclude that revision than watch it slowly get worse and worse. I remember the first time I bumped into this. Started work at a new place, committed some changes and about 10 minutes later, someone comes up and asks me to change options to tabs. 10 minutes!... damn code Nazis. :) "You get that on the big jobs."

Good to know, thanks. MrPlankton

Good point. Should have thought of this myself. Although I normally try to override base functions instead of binding events in the user control/form itself this sound good in this particular case where the Dispose method is already overriden in the Designer code. Thanks. Robert

:rose: So my problem where never security settings but only where to search my files... Robert

Hi! This article (Ingo Rammer about remoting best practices)[^] might be helpful. Regards, mav -- Black holes are the places where God divided by 0...

The Convert.ToInt32(string) method just checks for a null value, then calls Int32.Parse. It's quite possible that this code is inlined by the compiler. The inlined code would in that case resemble: string temp = ((Key)values[0]).Value; int sourceIndex = (temp == null) ? 0 : Int32.Parse(temp, NumberStyles.Integer, NumberFormatInfo.CurrentInfo); --- b { font-weight: normal; }

Stephen Hewitt wrote: simply not look in the VB thread That's what he wants to do, but the problem with it is that the users don't mention if it is about VB or VB.NET so you first have to read (or start reading) before you know you should not read it ...

Opps... :-O Misread your code!

No. I know how the look (they get some sort of greyed out). But when I set the Enabled property of my control (which inherits from ScrollableControl) to false the scrollbars still appear enabled (although not reacting to clicks).

A DataReader won't help me in this situation because the request normally returns only one row. Thus the first DaraReader.Read call will block. Any other ideas?

I've not found a memcpy type function or a memset, for that matter, in the framework. However, given that the color does not change, you could turn the RGBA values into an int, and then set it in one step for each pixel. nOffset will also be a multiple of 4, so you could set the pointer to be an int * all the way through, instead of having to cast it, just make sure you divide nOffset by 4 to match. Christian Graus - Microsoft MVP - C++

dan neely wrote: It'd depend on the implementation. True. You'd have to find one that saves diffs. I think those are getting pretty rare, since the performance hit is then on getting the latest version. Marc Pensieve

If only C# supported Covariant[^] return types, then your problem would go away. You'll be able to return TestClass and still implement ICloneable.Clone. Robert Rohde wrote: Why is the result of ICloneable.Clone an object and not ICloneable? I thought the intention of this interface was that the result should be some kind of deep copy of the object and should always have the same type.. ICloneable.Clone clones an object, so why should it return ICloneable? Regards Senthil _____________________________ My Blog | My Articles | WinMacro

The only generic way to do this is implement the ICorProfilerCallback interface, provided by the runtime. That said, I have never been able to figure it out either. Search on gotdotnet for CLR Profiler 2.0, that mite provide some help as the source is available. top secret xacc-ide 0.0.1