In MFC, you could only multiple inherit if only one of the classes being inherited was not derived from CObject. The reason it can't be done in .Net is that ALL objects are inherited from Object, and there's no way to avoid it. They could easily fix it with an attribute, but no, they'd rather adhere to their arbitrary restrictions. ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

It is a normal behaviour as RBFS is heuristic, so it discards some branches of the solution tree which may contain the solution. There are some heuristic algorithms, also for some graph problems, that find a solution which is not optimal but they at least find something close to the solution, which is satisfactory, whereas the other heuristic algorithms, when they miss the solution path, they will give you no results. For finding paths in graphs, heuristic algorithms should be used only if you do not have enough memory for a regular BFS. They usually provide no solution if they miss them. I am now writing solving diamond peg solitaire with BFS, which should be ready within a couple of days on my site informatyka-delphi.blogspot.com If I am lucky, the graph will have up to 15 GB, compressed graph 4GB, so I shall find the solution with BFS.

Sander Rossel wrote: I'm not sure what's worse, that you crashed your integrated graphics or that you had to write JavaScript to do so :sigh: :laugh: :laugh: I am not the one who knocks. I never knock. In fact, I hate knocking.

He is right, but anyone is free to try the keyboard he likes. I have on my PC a Apple style keyboard, so the feeling is like on my iMac. Press F1 for help or google it. Greetings from Germany

I would have just reversed the 2 strings and compared those. (KMP: Keep Me Partying). ;P "(I) am amazed to see myself here rather than there ... now rather than then". ― Blaise Pascal

I always try to discourage third party products. My argument is, you buy them for their solutions, but you also get their problems. Their priority on fixing those problems do not necessarily match yours. Earlier in my career we encountered an intractable problem with a third party product. We called them and told them of the problem. They said, yeah, that will get fixed in the next release. Great! When's the next release? In six months. We had a six week delivery deadline. My solution was simple, throw it away and write our own. Ours was smaller, faster, did just what we needed, and was under our control for bugs and future enhancements. Psychosis at 10 Film at 11 Those who do not remember the past, are doomed to repeat it. Those who do not remember the past, cannot build upon it.

Just wait until you get to work on some nice application that represents a collection of 20 years worth of 'best practices' by some Access monkeys. The language is JavaScript. that of Mordor, which I will not utter here This is Javascript. If you put big wheels and a racing stripe on a golf cart, it's still a fucking golf cart. "I don't know, extraterrestrial?" "You mean like from space?" "No, from Canada." If software development were a circus, we would all be the clowns.

I will refuse to vote for anyone who uses post-fix increment operators! Life is too shor

In Spain is: Don't put your (Kid Sister Rule), where you get your meal M.D.V. ;) If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about? Help me to understand what I'm saying, and I'll explain it better to you Rating helpful answers is nice, but saying thanks can be even nicer.

Unit tests are NOT "test cases". Writing those is the domain of QA, and they are developed based on requirements. ".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010 ----- You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010 ----- When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

By adding those 6 barrels, or a Windows 98 style background theme? The shit I complain about It's like there ain't a cloud in the sky and it's raining out - Eminem ~! Firewall !~

I think a tactical retreat is the best option, while humming - feigning a "geezer moment". This only really works after you have achieved geezerhood (0ne of the few advantages of getting old)! Life is like a s**t sandwich; the more bread you have, the less s**t you eat.

Yeah, the babysitting office. At my ex company they "imporved on that"... Spent a fortune on function-less design. Threw out perfectly good office furniture to switch to perfectly useless IKEA counter tables, where you couldn't put anything other than your laptop and desk phone. In the cold/wet season we had to drop our umbrellas and extras under the desks on the floor. After 3 months from the "opening up", the CTO walked down to a buddy of mine and asked him nicely, "Would you mind switching places with X over there? I'm kind of tired looking at your face whole day.."

All working now. Thank you. :D

Those geeks work with my brother.

Excuse me ma'am, ma'am! You forgot your.. Excuse me ma'am! Excuse me. Twits[^]

I have a Razer Lycosa, without the key-trouble that I've heard often is common. Guess I'm just lucky.

Agreed: C# is a thing of beauty. I once worked on the NeXt machine, and hated the Objective-C syntax, but it was cool to be able to directly execute PostScript (my specialty). I think Anders' genius exemplifies this kind of attitude: "When I'm working on a problem, I never think about beauty. I think only how to solve the problem. But when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong." R. Buckminster Fuller yours, Bill “Humans are amphibians: half spirit, half animal; as spirits they belong to the eternal world; as animals they inhabit time. While their spirit can be directed to an eternal object, their bodies, passions, and imagination are in continual change, for to be in time, means to change. Their nearest approach to constancy is undulation: repeated return to a level from which they repeatedly fall back, a series of troughs and peaks.” C.S. Lewis