Scott Dorman wrote: Defining the member in an interface doesn't imply that it is virtual at all. Aha! This is the root of my confusion. I was assuming that a C# interface was the same as a C++ interface (i.e. a collection of pure virtual/abstract methods). I remembered reading in the O'Reilly "C# Essentials" book that a C# interface was simply a syntactic shortcut for a bunch of abstract members in an abstract class but their exact wording was "similar to" :| The output from the following code gave me a surprise: interface I { void foo( string msg ) ; } class A : I { public void foo( string msg ) { System.Console.WriteLine( msg+" -> A::foo" ) ; } } class B : A { public void foo( string msg ) { System.Console.WriteLine( msg+" -> B::foo" ) ; } } static void Main() { B b = new B() ; ((I)b).foo( "Static type I" ) ; ((A)b).foo( "Static type A" ) ; ((B)b).foo( "Static type B" ) ; } --- OUTPUT --- Static type I -> A::foo Static type A -> A::foo Static type B -> B::foo In C++, the B::foo() method would've been called every time. No wonder I thought foreach appeared to be ignoring the IEnumerable's in the inheritance hierarchy. In every other OO language I've worked with, to get access to GetEnumerator() you would have to go through the IEnumerable but in C#, deriving from an interface seems to be little more than a directive to the compiler telling it that certain methods need to defined i.e. it doesn't really affect the class as such (e.g. by causing the layout of the v-table to change, or whatever C# uses). Playing around a little with the definition of B: class B : A,I { void foo( string msg ) { System.Console.WriteLine( msg+" -> B::foo" ) ; } } --- OUTPUT --- Static type I -> A::foo Static type A -> A::foo Static type B -> A::foo That's weird, but I think because B::foo() is not public: class B : A,I { public void foo( string msg ) { System.Console.WriteLine( msg+" -> B::foo" ) ; } } --- OUTPUT --- Static type I -> B::foo Static type A -> A::foo Static type B -> B::foo And how about these two: class B : A,I { void foo( string msg ) { System.Console.WriteLine( msg+" -> B::foo" ) ; } void I.foo( string msg ) { System.Console.WriteLine( msg+" -> B::foo 2" ) ; } } --- OUTPUT --- Static type I -> B::foo 2 Static type A -> A::foo Static type B -> A::foo c

Mike Dimmick wrote: No prompt, will reboot after installing at the scheduled time I set a friend up as described in my first message and he always gets a prompt window come up if it requires a reboot. It doesn't give him the option of cancelling it, only delaying it for up to four hours. When the four hours is up a countdown window will appear to allow him to close any applications and then the machine will automatically reboot. This is with XP Home, SP2 and a normal limited user account. :confused: Ðavid Wulff What kind of music should programmers listen to? Join the Code Project Last.fm group | dwulff I'm so gangsta I eat cereal without the milk

PPP is normally used over a modem link, so I would have thought that you would see this for modem cards configured for network access (not ethernet cards), but I'm guessing! Peter "Until the invention of the computer, the machine gun was the device that enabled humans to make the most mistakes in the smallest amount of time."

Well, that's what I wrote in my original post but it seems a bit of a clunky way of getting the info I need so I was just asking if there was a better way. Thanks anyway :-) 0 bottles of beer on the wall, 0 bottles of beer, you take 1 down, pass it around, 4294967295 bottles of beer on the wall. Awasu 2.2.4 [^]: A free RSS/Atom feed reader with support for Code Project.

Taka Muraoka wrote: Over the years, I have perfected my dirty glare. If necessary, a forceful "f*** OFF" will usually do the trick I used to use similar tactics but had a hard time trying to keep a mean face. :| I think I'll stick with "sexy movie you"! :~ Simply Elegant Designs JimmyRopes Designs Think inside the box! ProActive Secure Systems I'm on-line therefore I am. JimmyRopes

Bradml wrote: Yes, but you can't get MCE off the shelf. You can only ever get it from Dell/IBM/whatever. Not strictly true. You used to be able to get it on an MSDN subscription covering operating systems although I don't know if you still can as I don't have one anymore :-( [edit] Spelling again :-O [/edit] Rhys I'm glad I'm not Brezhnev. Being the Russian leader in the Kremlin, you never know if someone's tape-recording what you say. Richard Nixon

I've reported your post for amuse. :laugh: "Throughout human history, we have been dependent on machines to survive. Fate, it seems, is not without a sense of irony. " - Morpheus

Glad to hear it :rose: The tigress is here :-D

Take care :rose: The tigress is here :-D

As the developer made very clear, this was a consumer product aimed at the exact same demographic as the AOL user base. He also made clear that he really wanted to prove the CIO wrong, but couldn't do so no matter how wide he made the searches. I've been there, done that more than once. Years ago I worked for a place that hired a big shot marketing firm to do a study of their projected demographic. The report cost tens of thousands of dollars. Many of use were quite skeptical of it at the time. We have since been proved right--every last bit of research that company did was dead wrong (the market segment not only failed to mature, it's completely collapsed since then--this isn't merely hindsight, many of us saw this coming.) A better parallel would be if you got the full search history on Code Project. While you couldn't predict which products aimed at that demographic would be successful, you could sure as hell predict which wouldn't. Anyone who thinks he has a better idea of what's good for people than people do is a swine. - P.J. O'Rourke

Talking about my site? I stole it too. :) It's a slightly-tweaked version of 3k2.

I shall try that.  Take a look at Slax[^] (very nice and easy to customise live cds). Would be nice to introduce into the office :suss:, really annoy the admins :-D As of how to accomplish this I wouldn't have a clue at the moment and I'm too lazy to google it

Sorry it took so long to reply. I was camping for a couple of days. If you open an PDF file from CutePDF it creates a toolbar and then it embeds Adobe Reader inside the window (under the toobar). Not it may be possible to use other PDF readers (Foxit, etc.) I dont know. Here is a clip fromt he help file" ------------ CutePDF has the following installation requirements Works with Acrobat Reader 5.0, 5.1, Adobe Reader* 6.0, 7.0, or any other PDF viewer. Does not require the full version of Adobe Acrobat to run. Microsoft Windows 98, ME, 2000, XP, 2003. Internet Explorer Browser 5.0 (IE 5.0) or higher. Total system memory of at least 32MB RAM. A minimum of 5MB hard disk space. SVGA monitor. Suggested monitor settings: True Color, 800x600 or higher. * You can access http://www.adobe.com to download Adobe Reader from Adobe Systems Incorporated. -------------- Hope that clears it up. Cheers, David

Make the show stand up A man said to the universe: "Sir I exist!" "However," replied the Universe, "The fact has not created in me A sense of obligation." -- Stephen Crane

There are exemptions for virtualization in the Windows Server 2003 R2 Enterprise Edition licences. See here[^]. Stability. What an interesting concept. -- Chris Maunder

And I just fired up my IDE to give it a go. Sigh... :-( Thanks for the suggestion anyway. 0 bottles of beer on the wall, 0 bottles of beer, you take 1 down, pass it around, 4294967295 bottles of beer on the wall. Awasu 2.2.2 [^]: A free RSS/Atom feed reader with support for Code Project.

:groan: ;P --Mike-- Visual C++ MVP :cool: LINKS~! Ericahist | PimpFish | CP SearchBar v3.0 | C++ Forum FAQ VB > soccer

Sadly Not:( It does not work with Office 2007 which I have both at my home and work. My Blog