It happens, regardless how clever you are, how informed you are.

I thought to send this link to my manager who interrupts me, he is a source of time wasting for me. However, I don't think that the PMs who don't understand programming will read this.

One should look for recognition, appreciation comes later if you offered a good contribution.

good advice, thx for posting

I don't think this is achievable unless they had had strong training before !

Computerworld also wrote:

It's the most thankless job in the world right up until something goes wrong."

Kent Sharkey wrote:

shut down the servers for a while, make yourself noticed

or write every detail you do in work and report your work in a timely manner.

I think the opposite, pls check this[^]

Neither will die.

:)

When I posted this goto statement[^] comment I didn't think it would grow as such. I think I touched a deeply controversial topic in the development world. I then suggested on CodeProject to vote regarding GOTO and they replied on me with this old vote[^]

Why you need to delete it ?

Thank you.

thx, I sent the survey suggestion via that link

The goto statement[^] is really a valuable thread, full of contributions added by old developers. I didn't think it would grow as such. I think I touched a deeply controversial topic in the development world. I suggest that the CodeProject include a vote to know who is with or against the GOTO statement. As per the thread , it seems will fail, but the vote would be a nice thing to try. If you decided launching such vote pls keep me posted with the result in case I didn't open the site in the vote's day.

This serves as a single return as all gathered in one block

:)

I remember that when I started learning programming in 1985 or before that the version of the language I started with was build with no loop statements, except the FOR loop. This made it relied heavily on GOTO statement in the case of conditional loops. I think for languages,if any, with such structure one HAVE to use it, with care.

Could this be written by C# ?

Nice, you can use it to replace all loop statements, but be careful! :)