Not sure if honored, or ... :cool:

I hate that it decides, on my behalf, to remove unregistered controls. We have a library of controls that the IT group uses that we do not register. They are placed into a central remote directory for inclusion to Visual Studio. Does anyone know how to disable this 'feature' of removing unregistered components from the toolbox. there should be a menu option to run this removal of unregistered controls. do not do it for me. We have over 100+ unregistered controls in the centralized repository.

Absolutely I would feel uncomfortable. But not for the reason that some people seem to be imagining. It's because it makes me think that they're storing my password in plaintext. Basically, I can think of two ways that my password would be case insensitive. a) is deliberate - they uppercase (or lowercase) it before hashing it. It seems pointless and silly to do this, but it causes no great loss of security. b) is accidental - they're storing my password in plaintext, and SQL string comparisons are case insensitive by default. The tendency to believe b) is what makes me uncomfortable.

Happy New Year tgrt! I see the Design and Architecture forum has returned. I did not ignore your last post, the forum was not available after they launched the new version of the site. How is your project going? Do you need any further assistance? tgrt wrote: Logically this is a single application that will run by itself with no user interaction. That is what the COM+ Application Server is. tgrt wrote: the definition of the event will vary from module to module. Yes, each COM+ component defines what it does and how it does it. tgrt wrote: however, in that scenario an OOM condition would bring everything down. The COM+ server is fairly mature as it first surfaced back in like 1996 or something like that. I imagine you will find it quite robust in the latest versions of the Microsoft Server Operating Systems.

Prot a noblem, glad it worked.

I would go for the array, something like: Type[] daTypes=new Type[256]; ... // initialize for(int i=0; i<256; i++) daTypes[i]=typeof(string); daTypes[daConstant]=typeof(something); // repeat for each daConstant ... // use if ((val & 255)!=val) { type=typeof(string); // outside range [0, 255] } else { type=daTypes[val]; // inside range [0, 255] } so there is even no need to try-catch; only 1KB of data, and much faster than switch or HashTable. :) Luc Pattyn [My Articles] [Forum Guidelines]

Darn! I was hoping it would be something like Find Waldo[^].:( "A Journey of a Thousand Rest Stops Begins with a Single Movement"

Ed Gadziemski wrote: although you may want to go with 8 inches high if possible in case you get a taller TV in the future I actually wanted to go with that which was perfect for the height of my receiver. But, I have three pieces that I need to consider -- receiver, DVD player, and cable box. The DVD player and cable box wouldn't fit. That's okay though. I think a 42" is going to be fine in there for a long time. If I decide I want something bigger (I'm not that hungry for those types of toys) then I can get my butt in gear finish the basement and build myself a media room.

(1) There are two types of "System Builder" available: one has o come with a new PC, the other not. The restrictions, as I understand, are the same: no support, and not trasnferable to another PC. (This might dependd on the country, thoug. They are advertised here as "OEM" and "System Builder" respectively) (2) Software Assurance ("SA") for MS Open Licences is available from your MS Open reseller, too. Ask him for prices. But it's I think about 1/3rd of the purchase, so rarely worth the trouble. Resellers here do all the paperwork, so its very convenient compared to the Action Pack. Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Developers, Velopers, Develprs, Developers! We are a big screwed up dysfunctional psychotic happy family - some more screwed up, others more happy, but everybody's psychotic joint venture definition of CP Linkify!|Fold With Us!

I'm not familiar to that, but my lastly asked question is kind of related to your problem. I'm using the command copy "$(InputPath)" "$(OutDir)" within a custom build-step of a project-file. Works fine for me, except for the error message when the file allready exist ;) But I hope this will be solved soon.

Congratulations! Baby girls are wonderful. Especially to Dads. Just watch out for later, though. I'm at the "I came for your daughter, when I'm gone you know I got her" stage X| And can she swear...:~ She could easily make a sailor blush... ...Steve http://shazware.com[^]

Thank you.

Yeah, the stupid mistake people make is getting treatment first then saying, "I'm not paying that." this pisses the doctor and his staff off. They don't want to help you in this situation or they are *much* less likely to do so. We (when we were in very hard times) called our normal doctors and explained or circumstances ahead of time. We asked if we could seek treatment but explained we doubted we could pay for it. In almost every case (no ... :scratches head: in *every* case) they agreed to just write off the costs for care. I think the difference maker here was that we had been patients of good standing for quite a bit before and they knew when things got better we would be in good standing after. We still see all the same doctors now and of course we pay full price for care. All of these things are a factor *BUT* in most cases you can still ask and if your need is justifiable they will write it off. I've been too involved in the industry to have not heard of 100's of these examples.

This is the problem with the patent system, only physical products should be able to obtain patents, no software, formulas, processes, business logic, etc., those all would fall under copyright, not patents! Patents in today's world are nothing but tools for corrupt people to rob the earnings of hard working people! Rocky <>< Latest Code Blog Post: ASP.NET HttpException - Cannot use leading "..".. Latest Tech Blog Post: Blog changed to Subtext!