zqueezy wrote: I have a file called like ProjectCPrivate.h that I include from each header file from within project C Sounds like you're coupling the external interface of each 'Project C' to the internal interface - that's probably something to minimise, otherwise changes to that internal interface will require rebuilding of the whole system that's upstream of it. That should help when doing incremental builds. As for full builds...well, I've never found that the number of include files is much of a problem - it's the total amount of source code needing to be built... Java, Basic, who cares - it's all a bunch of tree-hugging hippy cr*p CodeProject MVP for 2010 - who'd'a thunk it!

not strange or wierd // ♫ 99 little bugs in the code, // 99 bugs in the code // We fix a bug, compile it again // 101 little bugs in the code ♫

I believe you can remove them by deleting the code-behind. As for updating intellisense: "Rome was not built in a day", and the same principle goes for any Microsoft product. Patience is a virtue, if you wait for the intellisense it will come. Sometimes building solutions updates the intellisense more frequently. Regards, Thomas Stockwell Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning. Visit my homepage Oracle Studios[^]

I would expect your ASSERT placed before the DoModal() to succeed, it just means that you are calling DoModal() from a CWnd derived class that has a valid Window, it has no bearing on the state of the dialog. Are you calling DestroyWindow() somewhere in your Dialog class?

zqueezy wrote: int iByteSize = bBitmap.bmWidthBytes * bBitmap.bmHeight * (bBitmap.bmBitsPixel/8); ...as long as you only use bitmaps witha format >= 8 bitsperpixel :) Mark Mark Salsbery Microsoft MVP - Visual C++ :java:

that should not matter if you put everything into a header file, but in most cases you will want to separate declaration with implementation! .... people just want to see the class members and know how to call it, they don't care how it's implemented and having to read tons of line of code figure out all your methods in a class is not the way to code. if you want to declare everything inside the head file you have to make all the method inline, otherwise you're going to get linking errors. i.e // headfile: A.h // class A { public: void MyFunc() { //write code inline } }; // don't do this in the headfile void A::MyFunc() { // write non-inline code } I am sure you will figure it out :-D Yours Truly, The One and Only!

C++ doesn't support XML comments. (I think C++ in VS 2008 may?) However, regular style comments e.g., // have been supported since VC++ 6.0 e.g., // This is a method called DoIt. void DoIt() {} If you then type object.DoIt() you'll get the comment as Intellisense. Other than that there's a free tool called Doxygen you can use. But I've not tried it. Kevin

zqueezy wrote: (No I'm not a newbie and I know what a union is...) hence, IMHO, there are no harms. :) If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.

To give my end-solution: I didn't know I had to create a Copy-Constructor for my class, you need a copy-constructor for classes that allocate memory dynamically...

zqueezy wrote: I'm using OpenGL and C++, of course http://home.gna.org/cal3d/[^] http://download.gna.org/cal3d/documentation/modeling/tutorial.html[^] not sure if you are wanting to do it all yourself, of find a library that does it for you (and then you are restricted to its bone design). At the very least you can peek at the code and see how they do the binding. :) _________________________ Asu no koto o ieba, tenjo de nezumi ga warau. Talk about things of tomorrow and the mice in the ceiling laugh. (Japanese Proverb)

damn, I found it finally... I had to add: glTexGeni(GL_S, GL_TEXTURE_GEN_MODE, GL_REFLECTION_MAP_EXT); glTexGeni(GL_T, GL_TEXTURE_GEN_MODE, GL_REFLECTION_MAP_EXT); glTexGeni(GL_R, GL_TEXTURE_GEN_MODE, GL_REFLECTION_MAP_EXT); after glTexImage2D I cannot see really why, and many tuts left that out...

Have you tried the C libs from Matlab? A friend of mine is doing programming for matlab in C, so there should be something to include. But I can not tell you what, because I don't know it. I will ask him but, at least, you can try looking for it. Greetings. -------- M.D.V. If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?

Hi Queezy, I can't speak for FFTs and SVD (what are you doing with decomposition, BTW? I recently read a paper which used SVDs as a text indexing algorithm such as Google), but I personally love Crypto++ for anything Cryptography related. This includes its Large Integer package, and Elliptical Curve implementation. Jeff

Glad you found the solution. Come back and visit us again. Best wishes, Hans [CodeProject Forum Guidelines] [How To Ask A Question] [My Articles]

Hi, another way to do this is to change the CSize into ChildFrm.cpp in the function PrecreateWindow () For xample: i make different window sizes depending of the parent element of the window BOOL CChildFrame::PreCreateWindow(CREATESTRUCT& cs) { if( !CMDIChildWnd::PreCreateWindow(cs) ) return FALSE; //Set the configuration for the NewViews CMDIChildWnd\* pMDIActive = MDIGetActive(); CDocument\* pDoc = pMDIActive->GetActiveDocument(); if ((pDoc) && (pDoc->m\_szNewFrameName != "")) { cs.style = WS\_SYSMENU | WS\_CAPTION | WS\_OVERLAPPED; if (pDoc->m\_pObject1 || pDoc->m\_pObject2) { cs.cx = 415; cs.cy = 260; } else if (pDoc->m\_pObject3->m\_nType == 0) { cs.cx = 517; cs.cy = 421; } else if (pDoc->m\_pObject3->m\_nType == 2) { cs.cx = 610; cs.cy = 435; } cs.lpszName = pDoc->m\_szNewFrameName; } return TRUE; } With this I put the caption of the new view according to the name of the element and some other parameters, and the size according to the type of the element. Greetings. -------- M.D.V. If something has a solution... Why do we have to worry about?. If it has no solution... For what reason do we have to worry about?