JOTD
-
A woman walks into a bar and asks for a double-entendre. So the barman gives her one.
Seeing as this sort of humor is common n many-many family shows and would not be caught onto by kid sisters I reckon it is appropriate. Other then that, :laugh:.
Brad Australian - "Bash.org" on "Mac Networking" barfcat: So if you used subnetting on a network with Mac's, would that be considered Apple CIDR?
-
this joke is not yet completed since it is not kid sister safe it is good that Moon_stick stop with that two lines itself. Better it will be good if it is posted in the SoapBox
Regards, Satips.:rose:
Oh stop with the kid sister crap: it's wearing really thin especially as any kid sister worth her salt wouldn't understand this anyway and, if she does understand it she's no longer a kid.
-
A woman walks into a bar and asks for a double-entendre. So the barman gives her one.
An oldie but goodie. Bit like a horse walks into a bar and ask for a drink. "Sure, " says the barman, "but why the long face?"
-
An oldie but goodie. Bit like a horse walks into a bar and ask for a drink. "Sure, " says the barman, "but why the long face?"
:laugh::laugh:
Regards, Satips.:rose:
-
No man there is third line in this joke. In that the kid sister is not safe. So he has stopped it with the two lines.
Regards, Satips.:rose:
Satips wrote:
No man there is third line in this joke.
Then please enlighten those of us that see the joke as already complete. I'm just glad I've seen it first in its incomplete form so as not to have it ruined.
-
No man there is third line in this joke. In that the kid sister is not safe. So he has stopped it with the two lines.
Regards, Satips.:rose:
Actually - there are only two lines. That's the whole point of the joke, and demands a graps of the subtle intricacies of the language and how the same sentence can have two meanings.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
-
What?! The punchline has a double meaning. If one's kid sister does NOT know the alternative meaning then it is safe. If one's kid sister DOES know the alternative meaning then any safety restriction in place isn't going to matter much the damage was done before now.
Upcoming events: * Glasgow: Mock Objects, SQL Server CLR Integration, Reporting Services, db4o, Dependency Injection with Spring ... * Reading: Developer Day 5 Never write for other people. Write for yourself, because you have a passion for it. -- Marc Clifton My website
Colin Angus Mackay wrote:
The punchline has a double meaning. If one's kid sister does NOT know the alternative meaning then it is safe. If one's kid sister DOES know the alternative meaning then any safety restriction in place isn't going to matter much the damage was done before now.
I disagree with that reasoning. Things like nudity (pics, links) and profanity are banned in the Lounge too - but since kids would already understand them to be profanity/nudity, then any safety restriction in place isn't going to matter much since the damage was done before now!
Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
My latest book : C++/CLI in Action / Amazon.com link -
No man there is third line in this joke. In that the kid sister is not safe. So he has stopped it with the two lines.
Regards, Satips.:rose:
No, there's no third line. If you want to be pedantic you could say that, since the final line has two meanings it could count as lines 2 and 3 all on it's own. But that'd be silly. FWIW, I've heard jokes one hell of a lot more explicit and obvious than this on shows like The Simspsons. IMHO totally kid sister safe, and apparently safe to those who aren't entirely aware of some of the nuances of the English language (",) Dave
-
This really depends on you knowing that a double entendre is actually innuendo.
Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.
Pete O`Hanlon wrote:
This really depends on you knowing that a double entendre is actually innuendo.
Ah, that explains it all! (erm, not!) Guess I'm slow today. Marc
-
Exactly and also this joke is not kid sister safe.
Regards, Satips.:rose:
Satips wrote:
Exactly and also this joke is not kid sister safe.
I'll be the pretend 'kid sister', 'cause I'm possibly the youngest person here. :cool: It's not really a rude joke. It's pretty funny just how short it is, but there's no need to get all bothered about it.
Ravel H. Joyce - Curiosity and imagination is more important than intelligence. But it certainly doesn't hurt. :)
-
Satips wrote:
Exactly and also this joke is not kid sister safe.
I'll be the pretend 'kid sister', 'cause I'm possibly the youngest person here. :cool: It's not really a rude joke. It's pretty funny just how short it is, but there's no need to get all bothered about it.
Ravel H. Joyce - Curiosity and imagination is more important than intelligence. But it certainly doesn't hurt. :)
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
I'll be the pretend 'kid sister', 'cause I'm possibly the youngest person here. It's not really a rude joke. It's pretty funny just how short it is, but there's no need to get all bothered about it.
LOL - you don't count as a "kid anything" since you are Aussie. You guys swear and make dirty jokes right from infancy, don't you? :rolleyes:
Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
My latest book : C++/CLI in Action / Amazon.com link -
Colin Angus Mackay wrote:
The punchline has a double meaning. If one's kid sister does NOT know the alternative meaning then it is safe. If one's kid sister DOES know the alternative meaning then any safety restriction in place isn't going to matter much the damage was done before now.
I disagree with that reasoning. Things like nudity (pics, links) and profanity are banned in the Lounge too - but since kids would already understand them to be profanity/nudity, then any safety restriction in place isn't going to matter much since the damage was done before now!
Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
My latest book : C++/CLI in Action / Amazon.com link -
Ravel H. Joyce wrote:
I'll be the pretend 'kid sister', 'cause I'm possibly the youngest person here. It's not really a rude joke. It's pretty funny just how short it is, but there's no need to get all bothered about it.
LOL - you don't count as a "kid anything" since you are Aussie. You guys swear and make dirty jokes right from infancy, don't you? :rolleyes:
Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
My latest book : C++/CLI in Action / Amazon.com linkNishant Sivakumar wrote:
LOL - you don't count as a "kid anything" since you are Aussie. You guys swear and make dirty jokes right from infancy, don't you?
Oh, I'm hurt that you'd think that! Although I guess you have a point. ;P Ever hear the one about the hillbilly newlyweds?
Ravel H. Joyce - Curiosity and imagination is more important than intelligence. But it certainly doesn't hurt. :)
-
A woman walks into a bar and asks for a double-entendre. So the barman gives her one.
-
Colin Angus Mackay wrote:
The punchline has a double meaning. If one's kid sister does NOT know the alternative meaning then it is safe. If one's kid sister DOES know the alternative meaning then any safety restriction in place isn't going to matter much the damage was done before now.
I disagree with that reasoning. Things like nudity (pics, links) and profanity are banned in the Lounge too - but since kids would already understand them to be profanity/nudity, then any safety restriction in place isn't going to matter much since the damage was done before now!
Regards, Nish
Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
My latest book : C++/CLI in Action / Amazon.com linkNudity is obvious, innuendo is not. It's hiding in plain sight. That's why it is often thrown into children's movies and cartoons. A little something extra for the adults to chuckle at while their kids laugh with the funny talking donkey.
BW
Quick to judge, quick to anger, slow to understand.
Ignorance and prejudice and fear walk hand in hand.
-- Neil Peart -
A woman walks into a bar and asks for a double-entendre. So the barman gives her one.