JOTD

Sathesh Sakthivel

:laugh::laugh:

Regards, Satips.:rose:

Brady Kelly

Satips wrote:

No man there is third line in this joke.

Then please enlighten those of us that see the joke as already complete. I'm just glad I've seen it first in its incomplete form so as not to have it ruined.

Pete OHanlon

Actually - there are only two lines. That's the whole point of the joke, and demands a graps of the subtle intricacies of the language and how the same sentence can have two meanings.

Deja View - the feeling that you've seen this post before.

Nish Nishant

Colin Angus Mackay wrote:

The punchline has a double meaning. If one's kid sister does NOT know the alternative meaning then it is safe. If one's kid sister DOES know the alternative meaning then any safety restriction in place isn't going to matter much the damage was done before now.

I disagree with that reasoning. Things like nudity (pics, links) and profanity are banned in the Lounge too - but since kids would already understand them to be profanity/nudity, then any safety restriction in place isn't going to matter much since the damage was done before now!

Regards, Nish

Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
My latest book : C++/CLI in Action / Amazon.com link

moon_stick

No, there's no third line. If you want to be pedantic you could say that, since the final line has two meanings it could count as lines 2 and 3 all on it's own. But that'd be silly. FWIW, I've heard jokes one hell of a lot more explicit and obvious than this on shows like The Simspsons. IMHO totally kid sister safe, and apparently safe to those who aren't entirely aware of some of the nuances of the English language (",) Dave

Marc Clifton

Pete O`Hanlon wrote:

This really depends on you knowing that a double entendre is actually innuendo.

Ah, that explains it all! (erm, not!) Guess I'm slow today. Marc

Thyme In The Country
Interacx
My Blog

soap brain

Satips wrote:

Exactly and also this joke is not kid sister safe.

I'll be the pretend 'kid sister', 'cause I'm possibly the youngest person here. :cool: It's not really a rude joke. It's pretty funny just how short it is, but there's no need to get all bothered about it.

Ravel H. Joyce - Curiosity and imagination is more important than intelligence. But it certainly doesn't hurt. :)

Nish Nishant

Ravel H. Joyce wrote:

I'll be the pretend 'kid sister', 'cause I'm possibly the youngest person here. It's not really a rude joke. It's pretty funny just how short it is, but there's no need to get all bothered about it.

LOL - you don't count as a "kid anything" since you are Aussie. You guys swear and make dirty jokes right from infancy, don't you? :rolleyes:

Regards, Nish

Nish’s thoughts on MFC, C++/CLI and .NET (my blog)
My latest book : C++/CLI in Action / Amazon.com link

Bradml

Quiet down, logic boy

Brad Australian - "Bash.org" on "The opposite of Love" <+pf_work> what's the opposite of <3? <Lokii> h8 <Rodry> </3 <sdoherty> >3 <Lems> !<3

soap brain

Nishant Sivakumar wrote:

LOL - you don't count as a "kid anything" since you are Aussie. You guys swear and make dirty jokes right from infancy, don't you?

Oh, I'm hurt that you'd think that! Although I guess you have a point. ;P Ever hear the one about the hillbilly newlyweds?

Ravel H. Joyce - Curiosity and imagination is more important than intelligence. But it certainly doesn't hurt. :)

Lost User

That was actually funny. I do not understand why people here will whine so much over a joke.

The divinity of Jesus is made a convenient cover for absurdity. - John Adams

brianwelsch

Nudity is obvious, innuendo is not. It's hiding in plain sight. That's why it is often thrown into children's movies and cartoons. A little something extra for the adults to chuckle at while their kids laugh with the funny talking donkey.

BW

Quick to judge, quick to anger, slow to understand.
Ignorance and prejudice and fear walk hand in hand.
-- Neil Peart

Member 96

:laugh: Funniest joke I've heard in a long time! Good one!

"110%" - it's the new 70%