Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. I dont feel like going back to work...

I dont feel like going back to work...

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
phpvisual-studiocomcollaborationbeta-testing
62 Posts 24 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • N Nagy Vilmos

    1.21 Gigawatts wrote:

    Politely remind him that he's a tw*t.

    How's that going to work? The correct approach is: "Oy! Gonad chops! Stop #slap# being #slap# such #slap# a #slap# tw*tting #slap# tw*t #slap# !!" ...and breath.


    Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done.

    1 Offline
    1 Offline
    1 21 Gigawatts
    wrote on last edited by
    #8

    Nagy Vilmos wrote:

    The correct approach is:

    Aahhh, I see you've dished out a few 'get real' beatings seminars before I must learn...

    "...great scott!" Dilbert: Aren't all meetings like this... Richard Dawkins: "What if you're wrong?"

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • I Ian Shlasko

      But where's the line between useless and wrong? I mean, you start here:

      a.SomeProp = a.SomeProp;

      Then here...

      Debug.Assert(a.SomeProp == a.SomeProp);

      And somehow you end up here...

      while (true)
      {
      if ((a.SomeProp == a.SomeProp) == true)
      {
      a.SomeProp = a.SomeProp;
      break;
      }
      }
      return (a.SomeProp == a.SomeProp);

      And then it starts to get a little weird.

      Proud to have finally moved to the A-Ark. Which one are you in? Developer, Author (Guardians of Xen)

      L Offline
      L Offline
      leppie
      wrote on last edited by
      #9

      Ian Shlasko wrote:

      And then it starts to get a little weird.

      Classic :) You should see the number of side-effects this guy does. It's insane!

      xacc.ide
      IronScheme - 1.0 beta 4 - out now!
      ((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x)))

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • B BonshatS

        The good old reflexive property. Maybe he just wanted to be sure it was initialized.

        L Offline
        L Offline
        leppie
        wrote on last edited by
        #10

        BonshatS wrote:

        Maybe he just wanted to be sure it was initialized.

        This is him exactly! http://www.geekherocomic.com/2009/07/27/common-pitfalls-initialize-your-variables/[^]

        xacc.ide
        IronScheme - 1.0 beta 4 - out now!
        ((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x)))

        P 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • L leppie

          as my 'team leader' does not why the following wrong:

          a.SomeProp = a.SomeProp; // no funny side-effects, plain old property

          And then he asked me not to criticize him... :wtf:

          xacc.ide
          IronScheme - 1.0 beta 4 - out now!
          ((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x)))

          M Offline
          M Offline
          martin_hughes
          wrote on last edited by
          #11

          What I don't get is, given your technical excellence and all that jazz, why you aren't the team leader? Mumbler? Strange body odour? Shy? Unwilling/unable to shout at management types and make demands?

          print "http://www.codeproject.com".toURL().text Ain't that Groovy?

          P 1 L N 4 Replies Last reply
          0
          • L leppie

            BonshatS wrote:

            Maybe he just wanted to be sure it was initialized.

            This is him exactly! http://www.geekherocomic.com/2009/07/27/common-pitfalls-initialize-your-variables/[^]

            xacc.ide
            IronScheme - 1.0 beta 4 - out now!
            ((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x)))

            P Offline
            P Offline
            Pierre Leclercq
            wrote on last edited by
            #12

            :-D

            You can't turn lead into gold, unless you've built yourself a nuclear plant.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • M martin_hughes

              What I don't get is, given your technical excellence and all that jazz, why you aren't the team leader? Mumbler? Strange body odour? Shy? Unwilling/unable to shout at management types and make demands?

              print "http://www.codeproject.com".toURL().text Ain't that Groovy?

              P Offline
              P Offline
              Pierre Leclercq
              wrote on last edited by
              #13

              hehe... http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_principle[^] arf: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dilbert_Principle[^]

              You can't turn lead into gold, unless you've built yourself a nuclear plant.

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • L leppie

                as my 'team leader' does not why the following wrong:

                a.SomeProp = a.SomeProp; // no funny side-effects, plain old property

                And then he asked me not to criticize him... :wtf:

                xacc.ide
                IronScheme - 1.0 beta 4 - out now!
                ((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x)))

                R Offline
                R Offline
                Rama Krishna Vavilala
                wrote on last edited by
                #14

                Early in my career, I once made a mistake of commenting a line of code, that broke the whole application. Here is how it looked like:-

                void BalanceInvoice(int x, int y , int z)
                {
                MyInvoiceObject* p = new MyInvoiceObject(x, y, z);
                delete p;

                ... Do other stuff that ran 200 lines ...
                }

                I commented the first line thinking it was useless. Turns out that the constructor and only the constructor did the main work. I hope your team leader does not write like that.

                public object SomeProp
                {
                get
                {
                return 0;
                }
                set
                {
                ... Connect to database ...
                ... Call a web service ...
                ... Do all the other important stuff required in the application ...
                }
                }

                L 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • M martin_hughes

                  What I don't get is, given your technical excellence and all that jazz, why you aren't the team leader? Mumbler? Strange body odour? Shy? Unwilling/unable to shout at management types and make demands?

                  print "http://www.codeproject.com".toURL().text Ain't that Groovy?

                  1 Offline
                  1 Offline
                  1 21 Gigawatts
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #15

                  martin_hughes wrote:

                  why you aren't the team leader

                  Probably because of his technical excellence.

                  "...great scott!" Dilbert: Aren't all meetings like this... Richard Dawkins: "What if you're wrong?"

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • M martin_hughes

                    What I don't get is, given your technical excellence and all that jazz, why you aren't the team leader? Mumbler? Strange body odour? Shy? Unwilling/unable to shout at management types and make demands?

                    print "http://www.codeproject.com".toURL().text Ain't that Groovy?

                    L Offline
                    L Offline
                    leppie
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #16

                    Because he was the clown that wrote up a quarter-assed client functional requirement spec. It lacks about 70% of the requirements. And somewhere inside his skull that info still lives (or rots). Please note, this 'client spec' is the only thing our team has to go on, and consistently the client complains about missing functionality. Professionally, I have been trying to avoid taking responsibility for someone else's fuckups, but it seems there is no other way now. Bottom line is, I dont wanna do anything, while he has write-access to the code. he has been spending the last 6 weeks working on something that should have taken 3 days max, given most of the code was copied from somewhere else on the internet (like pretty much all of his code, copies of other people's code, and mine...).

                    xacc.ide
                    IronScheme - 1.0 beta 4 - out now!
                    ((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x)))

                    N M M 3 Replies Last reply
                    0
                    • R Rama Krishna Vavilala

                      Early in my career, I once made a mistake of commenting a line of code, that broke the whole application. Here is how it looked like:-

                      void BalanceInvoice(int x, int y , int z)
                      {
                      MyInvoiceObject* p = new MyInvoiceObject(x, y, z);
                      delete p;

                      ... Do other stuff that ran 200 lines ...
                      }

                      I commented the first line thinking it was useless. Turns out that the constructor and only the constructor did the main work. I hope your team leader does not write like that.

                      public object SomeProp
                      {
                      get
                      {
                      return 0;
                      }
                      set
                      {
                      ... Connect to database ...
                      ... Call a web service ...
                      ... Do all the other important stuff required in the application ...
                      }
                      }

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      leppie
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #17

                      Side-effects are evil. Learn to appreciate that, and code becomes dead simple. I can code fresh code faster than trying to understand what his code is attempting to do.

                      xacc.ide
                      IronScheme - 1.0 beta 4 - out now!
                      ((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x)))

                      R M L 3 Replies Last reply
                      0
                      • L leppie

                        Side-effects are evil. Learn to appreciate that, and code becomes dead simple. I can code fresh code faster than trying to understand what his code is attempting to do.

                        xacc.ide
                        IronScheme - 1.0 beta 4 - out now!
                        ((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x)))

                        R Offline
                        R Offline
                        Rama Krishna Vavilala
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #18

                        leppie wrote:

                        Side-effects are evil.

                        Yes as I said I broke the main logic an entire application commenting out what I thought was useless.

                        P 1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • L leppie

                          Side-effects are evil. Learn to appreciate that, and code becomes dead simple. I can code fresh code faster than trying to understand what his code is attempting to do.

                          xacc.ide
                          IronScheme - 1.0 beta 4 - out now!
                          ((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x)))

                          M Offline
                          M Offline
                          Marc Clifton
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #19

                          leppie wrote:

                          Side-effects are evil. Learn to appreciate that, and code becomes dead simple.

                          But isn't that the worst thing about AOP, that you don't know what side effects might be introduced? Marc

                          Will work for food. Interacx

                          I'm not overthinking the problem, I just felt like I needed a small, unimportant, uninteresting rant! - Martin Hart Turner

                          P L B M 4 Replies Last reply
                          0
                          • R Rama Krishna Vavilala

                            leppie wrote:

                            Side-effects are evil.

                            Yes as I said I broke the main logic an entire application commenting out what I thought was useless.

                            P Offline
                            P Offline
                            Pierre Leclercq
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #20

                            But do not worry, there are cases when it is legitimate to comment out some unused/unnecessary code. But what your post shows, the worst the code is, the harder to choose what to comment out.

                            You can't turn lead into gold, unless you've built yourself a nuclear plant.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • M Marc Clifton

                              leppie wrote:

                              Side-effects are evil. Learn to appreciate that, and code becomes dead simple.

                              But isn't that the worst thing about AOP, that you don't know what side effects might be introduced? Marc

                              Will work for food. Interacx

                              I'm not overthinking the problem, I just felt like I needed a small, unimportant, uninteresting rant! - Martin Hart Turner

                              P Offline
                              P Offline
                              Pierre Leclercq
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #21

                              I always wonder why clean functional programming is not more common?

                              You can't turn lead into gold, unless you've built yourself a nuclear plant.

                              L 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • L leppie

                                Because he was the clown that wrote up a quarter-assed client functional requirement spec. It lacks about 70% of the requirements. And somewhere inside his skull that info still lives (or rots). Please note, this 'client spec' is the only thing our team has to go on, and consistently the client complains about missing functionality. Professionally, I have been trying to avoid taking responsibility for someone else's fuckups, but it seems there is no other way now. Bottom line is, I dont wanna do anything, while he has write-access to the code. he has been spending the last 6 weeks working on something that should have taken 3 days max, given most of the code was copied from somewhere else on the internet (like pretty much all of his code, copies of other people's code, and mine...).

                                xacc.ide
                                IronScheme - 1.0 beta 4 - out now!
                                ((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x)))

                                N Offline
                                N Offline
                                Nagy Vilmos
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #22

                                I wondered were my boss had got to! But as am in a kind mood, you can keep him. ;)


                                Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done.

                                B 1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • M Marc Clifton

                                  leppie wrote:

                                  Side-effects are evil. Learn to appreciate that, and code becomes dead simple.

                                  But isn't that the worst thing about AOP, that you don't know what side effects might be introduced? Marc

                                  Will work for food. Interacx

                                  I'm not overthinking the problem, I just felt like I needed a small, unimportant, uninteresting rant! - Martin Hart Turner

                                  L Offline
                                  L Offline
                                  leppie
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #23

                                  Marc Clifton wrote:

                                  But isn't that the worst thing about AOP, that you don't know what side effects might be introduced?

                                  That's the problem with age old pensioners, very unpredictable :) (sorry, im trying to cheer myself up)

                                  xacc.ide
                                  IronScheme - 1.0 beta 4 - out now!
                                  ((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x)))

                                  modified on Tuesday, July 28, 2009 11:02 AM

                                  N P 2 Replies Last reply
                                  0
                                  • L leppie

                                    Because he was the clown that wrote up a quarter-assed client functional requirement spec. It lacks about 70% of the requirements. And somewhere inside his skull that info still lives (or rots). Please note, this 'client spec' is the only thing our team has to go on, and consistently the client complains about missing functionality. Professionally, I have been trying to avoid taking responsibility for someone else's fuckups, but it seems there is no other way now. Bottom line is, I dont wanna do anything, while he has write-access to the code. he has been spending the last 6 weeks working on something that should have taken 3 days max, given most of the code was copied from somewhere else on the internet (like pretty much all of his code, copies of other people's code, and mine...).

                                    xacc.ide
                                    IronScheme - 1.0 beta 4 - out now!
                                    ((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x)))

                                    M Offline
                                    M Offline
                                    Mustafa Ismail Mustafa
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #24

                                    leppie wrote:

                                    he has been spending the last 6 weeks working on something that should have taken 3 days max

                                    Holy Zucchini! I'd have certainly rocked the boat...

                                    If the post was helpful, please vote, eh! Current activities: Book: Devils by Fyodor Dostoyevsky Project: Hospital Automation, final stage Learning: Image analysis, LINQ Now and forever, defiant to the end. What is Multiple Sclerosis[^]?

                                    L 1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • P Pierre Leclercq

                                      I always wonder why clean functional programming is not more common?

                                      You can't turn lead into gold, unless you've built yourself a nuclear plant.

                                      L Offline
                                      L Offline
                                      leppie
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #25

                                      Pierre Leclercq wrote:

                                      I always wonder why clean functional programming is not more common?

                                      I write 90% of my C# without side effects (excluding generated-code of course, that doesn't count). There is no reason why someone cannot do the same.

                                      xacc.ide
                                      IronScheme - 1.0 beta 4 - out now!
                                      ((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x)))

                                      N 1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • M martin_hughes

                                        What I don't get is, given your technical excellence and all that jazz, why you aren't the team leader? Mumbler? Strange body odour? Shy? Unwilling/unable to shout at management types and make demands?

                                        print "http://www.codeproject.com".toURL().text Ain't that Groovy?

                                        N Offline
                                        N Offline
                                        Nagy Vilmos
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #26

                                        martin_hughes wrote:

                                        technical excellence and all that jazz

                                        by the bucket full

                                        martin_hughes wrote:

                                        Mumbler?

                                        no

                                        martin_hughes wrote:

                                        Strange body odour?

                                        no

                                        martin_hughes wrote:

                                        Shy?

                                        no

                                        martin_hughes wrote:

                                        Unwilling/unable to shout at management types and make demands?

                                        no

                                        martin_hughes wrote:

                                        team leader

                                        apparently not. I'm a 'technical lead' which means my TL is half my age with 1/4 my knowledge and and 1/8 my experience. But I'm not bitter :mad:


                                        Panic, Chaos, Destruction. My work here is done.

                                        M B 2 Replies Last reply
                                        0
                                        • M Mustafa Ismail Mustafa

                                          leppie wrote:

                                          he has been spending the last 6 weeks working on something that should have taken 3 days max

                                          Holy Zucchini! I'd have certainly rocked the boat...

                                          If the post was helpful, please vote, eh! Current activities: Book: Devils by Fyodor Dostoyevsky Project: Hospital Automation, final stage Learning: Image analysis, LINQ Now and forever, defiant to the end. What is Multiple Sclerosis[^]?

                                          L Offline
                                          L Offline
                                          leppie
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #27

                                          His average estimate takes 8 times longer to complete than what he promises the manager/client and that is if it ever gets completed and not taken over by someone else.

                                          xacc.ide
                                          IronScheme - 1.0 beta 4 - out now!
                                          ((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x)))

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups