Back to C#.
-
I ran away from C# and got back to real programming some five years ago, and have been happy ever since. Today I found out I was assigned on a C# web project. Welcome back view states, postbacks, properties, dispose patterns and other "joys" I hoped I would never see again :) On the bright side, I can still use vim for editing code.
-
I ran away from C# and got back to real programming some five years ago, and have been happy ever since. Today I found out I was assigned on a C# web project. Welcome back view states, postbacks, properties, dispose patterns and other "joys" I hoped I would never see again :) On the bright side, I can still use vim for editing code.
Nemanja Trifunovic wrote:
view states, postbacks
Come on - don't blame C# for everything.
-
I ran away from C# and got back to real programming some five years ago, and have been happy ever since. Today I found out I was assigned on a C# web project. Welcome back view states, postbacks, properties, dispose patterns and other "joys" I hoped I would never see again :) On the bright side, I can still use vim for editing code.
Ah so now you won't have to worry about memory leaks - oh wait a minute! :doh:
Regards, Nish
My technology blog: voidnish.wordpress.com Code Project Forums : New Posts Monitor This application monitors for new posts in the Code Project forums.
-
I ran away from C# and got back to real programming some five years ago, and have been happy ever since. Today I found out I was assigned on a C# web project. Welcome back view states, postbacks, properties, dispose patterns and other "joys" I hoped I would never see again :) On the bright side, I can still use vim for editing code.
-
What's wrong with properties? I'm glad I don't have to do that silly verbose get/set thing anymore..
harold aptroot wrote:
silly verbose get/set thing anymore..
Properties are just a little less verbose but still silly get/set things that look like member fields even if they are really methods.
-
Nemanja Trifunovic wrote:
view states, postbacks
Come on - don't blame C# for everything.
Mladen Jankovic wrote:
don't blame C# for everything.
Yes - strictly speaking I should blame ASP.NET web forms for those, but the fact remains I never see them when programming with some other language (VB does not qualify as "other").
-
I ran away from C# and got back to real programming some five years ago, and have been happy ever since. Today I found out I was assigned on a C# web project. Welcome back view states, postbacks, properties, dispose patterns and other "joys" I hoped I would never see again :) On the bright side, I can still use vim for editing code.
Think of it this way - you can always tell the client it "will be fixed in Microsoft's next service pack".
The funniest thing about this particular signature is that by the time you realise it doesn't say anything it's too late to stop reading it. My latest tip/trick Visit the Hindi forum here.
-
I ran away from C# and got back to real programming some five years ago, and have been happy ever since. Today I found out I was assigned on a C# web project. Welcome back view states, postbacks, properties, dispose patterns and other "joys" I hoped I would never see again :) On the bright side, I can still use vim for editing code.
Convert it to ASP.NET MVC and half of those atrocities will disappear.
Todd Smith
-
Actually blame the dipshit developers for forcing app development onto HTTP.
¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! Personal 3D projects Just Say No to Web 2 Point Blow
-
Nemanja Trifunovic wrote:
I never see them when programming with some other language (VB does not qualify as "other language").
FTFY!
Real men don't use instructions. They are only the manufacturers opinion on how to put the thing together.
-
Convert it to ASP.NET MVC and half of those atrocities will disappear.
Todd Smith
Jargons like that make me want to go to something simpler - like x86 assembly. :laugh:
There are some really weird people on this planet - MIM.
-
Convert it to ASP.NET MVC and half of those atrocities will disappear.
Todd Smith
-
Actually blame the dipshit developers for forcing app development onto HTTP.
¡El diablo está en mis pantalones! ¡Mire, mire! SELECT * FROM User WHERE Clue > 0 0 rows returned Save an Orange - Use the VCF! Personal 3D projects Just Say No to Web 2 Point Blow
Jim Crafton wrote:
Actually blame the dipshit developers for forcing app development onto HTTP.
I agree. However, the web forms model of trying to cover up the stateless nature of HTTP really does more harm than good.
-
I ran away from C# and got back to real programming some five years ago, and have been happy ever since. Today I found out I was assigned on a C# web project. Welcome back view states, postbacks, properties, dispose patterns and other "joys" I hoped I would never see again :) On the bright side, I can still use vim for editing code.
Nemanja Trifunovic wrote:
Today I found out I was assigned on a C# web project.
They really seem to be playing musical chairs where you work. :)
xacc.ide
IronScheme - 1.0 RC 1 - out now!
((λ (x) `(,x ',x)) '(λ (x) `(,x ',x))) The Scheme Programming Language – Fourth Edition -
I ran away from C# and got back to real programming some five years ago, and have been happy ever since. Today I found out I was assigned on a C# web project. Welcome back view states, postbacks, properties, dispose patterns and other "joys" I hoped I would never see again :) On the bright side, I can still use vim for editing code.
Going "back to C#" would be a bit like going "back to the future", eh? :-D
Nemanja Trifunovic wrote:
view states
It's good that ASP.Net automatically manages that for you, and allows you to customize it, eh?
Nemanja Trifunovic wrote:
postbacks
Or you could use AJAX. Or just JavaScript. Or Silverlight (using C# and, if necessary, web services). Or not develop for the web.
Nemanja Trifunovic wrote:
properties
Which now have a short syntax, and which also allow you to modify a DLL to add functionality later (e.g., if you decide you want to grab a value from the web.config rather than a private constant member) without having to change the code that relies on it. A nifty feature, IMO.
Nemanja Trifunovic wrote:
dispose patterns
Yeah, pointers and manual memory management were so much more "fun".
Nemanja Trifunovic wrote:
vim for editing code
Nemanja Trifunovic wrote:
I ran away from C# and got back to real programming some five years ago, and have been happy ever since.
I guess some people just like a challenge. You seem like just the type of person who would enjoy QuickBasic 4.5 with some inline machine code. That way, you get a crappy editor AND you can program for one of the hardest possible languages to use. ;)
-
Going "back to C#" would be a bit like going "back to the future", eh? :-D
Nemanja Trifunovic wrote:
view states
It's good that ASP.Net automatically manages that for you, and allows you to customize it, eh?
Nemanja Trifunovic wrote:
postbacks
Or you could use AJAX. Or just JavaScript. Or Silverlight (using C# and, if necessary, web services). Or not develop for the web.
Nemanja Trifunovic wrote:
properties
Which now have a short syntax, and which also allow you to modify a DLL to add functionality later (e.g., if you decide you want to grab a value from the web.config rather than a private constant member) without having to change the code that relies on it. A nifty feature, IMO.
Nemanja Trifunovic wrote:
dispose patterns
Yeah, pointers and manual memory management were so much more "fun".
Nemanja Trifunovic wrote:
vim for editing code
Nemanja Trifunovic wrote:
I ran away from C# and got back to real programming some five years ago, and have been happy ever since.
I guess some people just like a challenge. You seem like just the type of person who would enjoy QuickBasic 4.5 with some inline machine code. That way, you get a crappy editor AND you can program for one of the hardest possible languages to use. ;)
aspdotnetdev wrote:
eh?
Meh. Btw - it was not me who downvoted your post.
modified on Wednesday, September 22, 2010 3:17 PM
-
I ran away from C# and got back to real programming some five years ago, and have been happy ever since. Today I found out I was assigned on a C# web project. Welcome back view states, postbacks, properties, dispose patterns and other "joys" I hoped I would never see again :) On the bright side, I can still use vim for editing code.
I'm happy with
LuaandCat the moment. I've already the moon, so no regrets for the discardedOOP. :rolleyes:If the Lord God Almighty had consulted me before embarking upon the Creation, I would have recommended something simpler. -- Alfonso the Wise, 13th Century King of Castile.
This is going on my arrogant assumptions. You may have a superb reason why I'm completely wrong. -- Iain Clarke
[My articles] -
What's wrong with properties? I'm glad I don't have to do that silly verbose get/set thing anymore..
-
If you use public member data (er, "fields") you don't have to do the get/set thing regardless...
-
harold aptroot wrote:
silly verbose get/set thing anymore..
Properties are just a little less verbose but still silly get/set things that look like member fields even if they are really methods.
You are the first person I've ever seen don't liking Properties. They are syntactic sugar but they make the code concise and understandable. Yes they are methods, you know they are, they start with a capital letter, but what's the problem about that?
