one equal to two ?
-
The error is in your lack of understanding what this Forum is for and so posting an utterly inappropriate message.
«OOP to me means only messaging, local retention and protection and hiding of state-process, and extreme late-binding of all things. » Alan Kay's clarification on what he meant by the term "Object" in "Object-Oriented Programming."
A little unlike your usual self - woke up from the wrong side of the bed today? :) Sure, it's decades old, but hardly inappropriate given the other drivel that goes on here.
Cheers, विक्रम "We have already been through this, I am not going to repeat myself." - fat_boy, in a global warming thread :doh:
-
The eleventh commandment: Thou shall not divide with zero.
Wrong is evil and must be defeated. - Jeff Ello (√-shit)2
:laugh: :laugh: :laugh:
-
There is no error! 1 is indeed equal to 2 for very large value of 1! I think this is what just happened to you! :rolleyes: :-D
My programming get away... The Blog... All in one Menu-Ribbon Bar DirectX for WinRT/C# since 2013! Taking over the world since 1371!
0 = false 1 or 2 or >2 = true 1=true 2=true ... ?? :laugh: :laugh:
-
Hey do you want to lend me $2000? If so just give us half of it now, that will mean I owe you $1000 and you owe me $1000 and that will mean we are even.
Abbott and Costello said it better.
-
Quote:
a(a-a)=(a+a)(a-a)
Skipper: We'll fix it. Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this? Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
-
Let read this :
1=1 a=a a²=a² a²-a²=a²-a² a(a-a)=(a+a)(a-a) a=a+a a(1)=a(1+1) 1=1+1 1=2Where is the error ?The error begins from first assumptions -- saying
1=1at the beginning is meaningless; everthing following can provide no additional insight.a²-a²anda-aare always zero, but this is due to the nonsense above that -- in particular, whilea²-a²=a²-a²may be true, it doesn't follow froma²=a². The idiot of a Discrete Math teacher I had in college tried showing this to the class once. :sigh: -
Nah, she didn't day "damn", she said "f......". :-D
-
:thumbsdown: I don't think, this is a simple factorization
That you do not think so it will not change the fact that, when you move from this line to the next, you actually divide by zero - (a-a)!!! More! A solution of an equation must be traversal to both direction - yours is not! a=a a²=a² This is a one-way step and is forbidden...
Skipper: We'll fix it. Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this? Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
-
The error begins from first assumptions -- saying
1=1at the beginning is meaningless; everthing following can provide no additional insight.a²-a²anda-aare always zero, but this is due to the nonsense above that -- in particular, whilea²-a²=a²-a²may be true, it doesn't follow froma²=a². The idiot of a Discrete Math teacher I had in college tried showing this to the class once. :sigh: -
That you do not think so it will not change the fact that, when you move from this line to the next, you actually divide by zero - (a-a)!!! More! A solution of an equation must be traversal to both direction - yours is not! a=a a²=a² This is a one-way step and is forbidden...
Skipper: We'll fix it. Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this? Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
ok !! :thumbsup: My best answer[^]
-
:laugh: As I know mathematics doesn't approve 0=0 so, the error is a²-a²=a²-a² (meaning 0=0) exactly it is a teacher who showed it to us.
It has nothing to do with 0 equal to 0 or not (which is a mathematical game only), but the fact that division by zero is not permitted (or more precisely the outcome is undefined)...
Skipper: We'll fix it. Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this? Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
-
It has nothing to do with 0 equal to 0 or not (which is a mathematical game only), but the fact that division by zero is not permitted (or more precisely the outcome is undefined)...
Skipper: We'll fix it. Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this? Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
-
It has nothing to do with 0 equal to 0 or not (which is a mathematical game only), but the fact that division by zero is not permitted (or more precisely the outcome is undefined)...
Skipper: We'll fix it. Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this? Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.
1=1 a=a <=> a/a=1 a²=a² ?? a=b <=> a/b=1 a²=b² ?? then a=b a-c = b-c ? a-a = a-a (assuming a=b and a=c) ?? Where is the division by zero ? I've added c at both sides of =
-
Let read this :
1=1 a=a a²=a² a²-a²=a²-a² a(a-a)=(a+a)(a-a) a=a+a a(1)=a(1+1) 1=1+1 1=2Where is the error ?tayoufabrice wrote:
Where is the error ?
In between your ears: obviously the answer is 42.
-
Let read this :
1=1 a=a a²=a² a²-a²=a²-a² a(a-a)=(a+a)(a-a) a=a+a a(1)=a(1+1) 1=1+1 1=2Where is the error ? -
1=1 a=a <=> a/a=1 a²=a² ?? a=b <=> a/b=1 a²=b² ?? then a=b a-c = b-c ? a-a = a-a (assuming a=b and a=c) ?? Where is the division by zero ? I've added c at both sides of =
At the final step, you effectively have
a=0, which means thata/a=1on the second line is division by zero. But why werebandcintroduced? It's just nonsense. Additionally,a²=b²certainly does not meana=b. -
Let read this :
1=1 a=a a²=a² a²-a²=a²-a² a(a-a)=(a+a)(a-a) a=a+a a(1)=a(1+1) 1=1+1 1=2Where is the error ? -
Let read this :
1=1 a=a a²=a² a²-a²=a²-a² a(a-a)=(a+a)(a-a) a=a+a a(1)=a(1+1) 1=1+1 1=2Where is the error ?The error is I haven't had coffee yet.
New version: WinHeist Version 2.1.0 There's a fine line between crazy and free spirited and it's usually a prescription. I'm currently unsupervised, I know it freaks me out too but the possibilities are endless.
-
At the final step, you effectively have
a=0, which means thata/a=1on the second line is division by zero. But why werebandcintroduced? It's just nonsense. Additionally,a²=b²certainly does not meana=b. -
a - a = 0
You cannot get anything useful from a multiplication once it has involved a zero term.
5 x 0 = 12012 x 0
does not mean that
5 = 12012
There are two kinds of people in the world: those who can extrapolate from incomplete data.
very very
TRUE:thumbsup::thumbsup:
