Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. David Cameron wants to ban encryption

David Cameron wants to ban encryption

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csharphtmlsecurityquestion
36 Posts 26 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • D Duncan Edwards Jones

    What David Cameron just proposed would endanger every Briton and destroy the IT industry[^]... Has he lost the plot completely?

    K Offline
    K Offline
    KarstenK
    wrote on last edited by
    #17

    Not really - he only wants to read your messaging :~

    Press F1 for help or google it. Greetings from Germany

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • D Duncan Edwards Jones

      What David Cameron just proposed would endanger every Briton and destroy the IT industry[^]... Has he lost the plot completely?

      G Offline
      G Offline
      GenJerDan
      wrote on last edited by
      #18

      He should have retired after he made Titanic.

      We won't sit down. We won't shut up. We won't go quietly away. YouTube and My Mu[sic], Films and Windows Programs, etc.

      N 1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • D Duncan Edwards Jones

        What David Cameron just proposed would endanger every Briton and destroy the IT industry[^]... Has he lost the plot completely?

        P Offline
        P Offline
        PIEBALDconsult
        wrote on last edited by
        #19

        Sorry, that ship has sailed.

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • G GenJerDan

          He should have retired after he made Titanic.

          We won't sit down. We won't shut up. We won't go quietly away. YouTube and My Mu[sic], Films and Windows Programs, etc.

          N Offline
          N Offline
          Nemanja Trifunovic
          wrote on last edited by
          #20

          GenJerDan wrote:

          He should have retired after he made Titanic.

          He should have retired after before he made Titanic.

          utf8-cpp

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • D Duncan Edwards Jones

            What David Cameron just proposed would endanger every Briton and destroy the IT industry[^]... Has he lost the plot completely?

            L Offline
            L Offline
            Lost User
            wrote on last edited by
            #21

            I'd say the last few PM's we've had have probably been amongst the worst this country's ever seen. The next one isn't looking great either :(

            How do you know so much about swallows? Well, you have to know these things when you're a king, you know.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • D Duncan Edwards Jones

              What David Cameron just proposed would endanger every Briton and destroy the IT industry[^]... Has he lost the plot completely?

              Sander RosselS Offline
              Sander RosselS Offline
              Sander Rossel
              wrote on last edited by
              #22

              If your password is difficult enough you don't need encryption anyway! :D

              My blog[^]

              public class SanderRossel : Lazy<Person>
              {
              public void DoWork()
              {
              throw new NotSupportedException();
              }
              }

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • M Munchies_Matt

                What a tit he is. Really. The problem with the Paris incident is the failure of the French to surveil these people despite them being known affiliates of terrorists. That, was a stupid mistake to make.

                Sign a petition calling for the boycott of Israel until it returns to its legal 1967 borders.

                W Offline
                W Offline
                W Balboos GHB
                wrote on last edited by
                #23

                One explanation I heard for that dropping of surveillance was to reduce expenses.

                "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

                "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert

                "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

                L 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • D Duncan Edwards Jones

                  What David Cameron just proposed would endanger every Briton and destroy the IT industry[^]... Has he lost the plot completely?

                  W Offline
                  W Offline
                  W Balboos GHB
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #24

                  Epft uibu nfbo J'n jo uspvcmf?

                  "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

                  "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert

                  "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • D Duncan Edwards Jones

                    What David Cameron just proposed would endanger every Briton and destroy the IT industry[^]... Has he lost the plot completely?

                    M Offline
                    M Offline
                    Member 4724084
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #25

                    Not really, as encryption is becoming more and more irrelevant. Even AES256 can be broken in a rather trivial manner with multiple programmable GPU's. Every message should be readable? A more correct statement would be every message is readable with a little bit of knowledge and the right hardware.

                    S 1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • S Slacker007

                      It's not entirely, knee jerk response. Governments want to control message encryption to a certain degree; that is fact, not fiction.

                      L Offline
                      L Offline
                      Leo56
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #26

                      True. It's WHY they want to control it that concerns me...

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • D Duncan Edwards Jones

                        What David Cameron just proposed would endanger every Briton and destroy the IT industry[^]... Has he lost the plot completely?

                        S Offline
                        S Offline
                        Simon ORiordan from UK
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #27

                        David Cameron is an BUnLQyVPaM72bzAb3coSNPv2iOK8wkgVZ2sooIOVTMk= And yes, that is real, and yes, it is rude.

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • W W Balboos GHB

                          One explanation I heard for that dropping of surveillance was to reduce expenses.

                          "The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits." - Albert Einstein

                          "As far as we know, our computer has never had an undetected error." - Weisert

                          "If you are searching for perfection in others, then you seek disappointment. If you are seek perfection in yourself, then you will find failure." - Balboos HaGadol Mar 2010

                          L Offline
                          L Offline
                          Leo56
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #28

                          Your first quote sums up Cameron so perfectly....

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • M Member 4724084

                            Not really, as encryption is becoming more and more irrelevant. Even AES256 can be broken in a rather trivial manner with multiple programmable GPU's. Every message should be readable? A more correct statement would be every message is readable with a little bit of knowledge and the right hardware.

                            S Offline
                            S Offline
                            Simon ORiordan from UK
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #29

                            Maybe, but if Zetabytes of encrypted data are produced, how are they going to know which bits are of interest without decrypting the lot before they do their data mining?

                            M 1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            • S Simon ORiordan from UK

                              Maybe, but if Zetabytes of encrypted data are produced, how are they going to know which bits are of interest without decrypting the lot before they do their data mining?

                              M Offline
                              M Offline
                              Member 4724084
                              wrote on last edited by
                              #30

                              Quite simply, they can't. Not without some seriously hard-core distributed computing and analytics going on under the hood, where each node is capable of decrypting and sifting through several terabytes of data at any given moment. A tall order even for a government. The question then becomes what does one do with the data, according to Seagate we will have collectively produced some 44 Zetabytes of data by the year 2020. The limits of data storage across the globe, according to Seagate, will have been reached around the same time. Past that point, your guess is as good as mine. Cameron and others will have to come up with some other form of police state.

                              S 1 Reply Last reply
                              0
                              • M Member 4724084

                                Quite simply, they can't. Not without some seriously hard-core distributed computing and analytics going on under the hood, where each node is capable of decrypting and sifting through several terabytes of data at any given moment. A tall order even for a government. The question then becomes what does one do with the data, according to Seagate we will have collectively produced some 44 Zetabytes of data by the year 2020. The limits of data storage across the globe, according to Seagate, will have been reached around the same time. Past that point, your guess is as good as mine. Cameron and others will have to come up with some other form of police state.

                                S Offline
                                S Offline
                                Simon ORiordan from UK
                                wrote on last edited by
                                #31

                                So, like with bit torrents, he wants to eliminate the average traffic and cherry-pick victims as and when from what remains. Cynical tiG3zDrNg/0XFrVtUwttyg== isn't he. He's persecuting grandma so he can victimise the savvy at leisure. Nice. Incidentally, whenever one gets ripped off by DVD vendors (lack of sound, 4:3 aspect ratio, wrong zone, encryption won't work), one can fire up Tails os and navigate to any torrent site, then one download the torrent file and run it from Windoze, no problem. Instant recovery of one's property, no need for snail mail returns, no need to spend more money trying to recover one's money, and of course, one gets what one paid for in the first place. Not that I ever would of course. Cheers!

                                1 Reply Last reply
                                0
                                • Kornfeld Eliyahu PeterK Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter

                                  I had to look-up who David Cameron is (sorry), but if PM here would ask for such back-door people would show him out of the front door...

                                  Skipper: We'll fix it. Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this? Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.

                                  M Offline
                                  M Offline
                                  Member 4281566
                                  wrote on last edited by
                                  #32

                                  Perhaps GCHQ would like to drop all their encrypted transmissions. What's David's thoughts on that?

                                  1 Reply Last reply
                                  0
                                  • D Duncan Edwards Jones

                                    What David Cameron just proposed would endanger every Briton and destroy the IT industry[^]... Has he lost the plot completely?

                                    L Offline
                                    L Offline
                                    Lost User
                                    wrote on last edited by
                                    #33

                                    Pro Tip: Politicians aren't in the game for your benefit.

                                    1 Reply Last reply
                                    0
                                    • D Duncan Edwards Jones

                                      What David Cameron just proposed would endanger every Briton and destroy the IT industry[^]... Has he lost the plot completely?

                                      A Offline
                                      A Offline
                                      Alan Balkany
                                      wrote on last edited by
                                      #34

                                      David Cameron is ultra-focused on his desire for the government to be able to read your emails. This impractical enemy of democracy and privacy needs to be removed from any position of responsibility.

                                      1 Reply Last reply
                                      0
                                      • D Duncan Edwards Jones

                                        What David Cameron just proposed would endanger every Briton and destroy the IT industry[^]... Has he lost the plot completely?

                                        J Offline
                                        J Offline
                                        Jim McCool
                                        wrote on last edited by
                                        #35

                                        The US tried something similar back in the 90's, but was slightly smarter about it. Anyone remember the clipper chip? This inexpensive chip was to be installed in phones, PCs, anywhere "secure" encryption was needed. It also provided for key escrow so that any authorized government entity could obtain the key. It never did catch on, and the public backlash resulted in several free public encryption schemes including PGP, which is still in use.

                                        1 Reply Last reply
                                        0
                                        • Kornfeld Eliyahu PeterK Kornfeld Eliyahu Peter

                                          It sounds clear...

                                          David Cameron:

                                          "Are we going to allow a means of communications which it simply isn't possible to read? My answer to that question is: 'No, we must not.'"

                                          Skipper: We'll fix it. Alex: Fix it? How you gonna fix this? Skipper: Grit, spit and a whole lotta duct tape.

                                          G Offline
                                          G Offline
                                          giuchici
                                          wrote on last edited by
                                          #36

                                          Not necessarily. He may be thinking of messages in english that are so very badly written that they are impossible to read - understand. At least in my area, when you worked enough in multinational software development teams and read some of the code comments you would really appreciate having them banned.

                                          giuchici

                                          1 Reply Last reply
                                          0
                                          Reply
                                          • Reply as topic
                                          Log in to reply
                                          • Oldest to Newest
                                          • Newest to Oldest
                                          • Most Votes


                                          • Login

                                          • Don't have an account? Register

                                          • Login or register to search.
                                          • First post
                                            Last post
                                          0
                                          • Categories
                                          • Recent
                                          • Tags
                                          • Popular
                                          • World
                                          • Users
                                          • Groups