Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Proof of the astronomical probability that You do not exist !

Proof of the astronomical probability that You do not exist !

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csharpcomsecurityhelpquestion
37 Posts 18 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • L Lost User

    Mark_Wallace wrote:

    totally unimportant creatures

    Speak for yourself ;) Depends if the single-big-bang theory is true, really. If Time started with the big bang, then the very concept of 'before' cannot exist.

    PooperPig - Coming Soon

    M Offline
    M Offline
    Mark_Wallace
    wrote on last edited by
    #25

    Time became what it is with the big bang; that's subtly different from starting. Still, why waste energy thinking about it? Sooner or later, someone (possibly on a different but equally totally unimportant planet) will make a time machine, and there'll be another big bang, so every totally unimportant thing we ever do will be gone.

    I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

    L 1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Mark_Wallace

      Time became what it is with the big bang; that's subtly different from starting. Still, why waste energy thinking about it? Sooner or later, someone (possibly on a different but equally totally unimportant planet) will make a time machine, and there'll be another big bang, so every totally unimportant thing we ever do will be gone.

      I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

      L Offline
      L Offline
      Lost User
      wrote on last edited by
      #26

      or maybe it's already happened :)

      PooperPig - Coming Soon

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • M Marc Clifton

        Ah, the way statistics can manipulate reality. On the other hand, the probably that any human exists is 100% -- after all, humans exist. It's irrelevant to ask the probably that I exist because all those humans that exist are "I's" and the ones that don't are obviously "not I." In other words, you cannot have a human exist that is not an "I" (meaning, a unique individual to which we can say "you" to.) Silly statistics. :) Marc

        Imperative to Functional Programming Succinctly Contributors Wanted for Higher Order Programming Project!

        N Offline
        N Offline
        Nish Nishant
        wrote on last edited by
        #27

        Marc Clifton wrote:

        Silly statistics

        Three statisticians go hunting together. They see a deer, and the first statistician shoots, but his shot misses by a foot to the left. Then the second statistician shoots, but his shot misses by a foot to the right. The third statistician says "Okay, we got it!"

        Regards, Nish


        Website: www.voidnish.com Blog: voidnish.wordpress.com

        1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • M Mark_Wallace

          You obviously go to different casinos than those I've visited.

          I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

          M Offline
          M Offline
          Member 10707677
          wrote on last edited by
          #28

          I usually go to casinos to visit my money.

          The difficult may take time, the impossible a little longer.

          1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • M Mark_Wallace

            You're right. Elegance is simplicity.

            I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

            A Offline
            A Offline
            AXAMLMAN
            wrote on last edited by
            #29

            And Simplicity is Elegant.

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • B BillWoodruff

              I've always had my doubts since I was wee tad and heard my parents talking, and my father saying: "but, where did he come from ?:" [^]

              «To kill an error's as good a service, sometimes better than, establishing new truth or fact.» Charles Darwin in "Prospero's Precepts"

              R Offline
              R Offline
              Rui_Dias
              wrote on last edited by
              #30

              Odds are not applicable once an experiment's outcome is known/becomes a fact. Whoever did that poster wasted his (or her) time and made other waste theirs (including mine!) Be happy.

              9 1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • K Kenneth Haugland

                I'm not entirely sure what the meaning of the words are, as per usual in these theorems. But it was said of QM that if you hit a tennis ball and infinite number of times on a wall it will at one point just pass through the wall. The theorem seem to say that QM can influence the result in any way? :doh:

                9 Offline
                9 Offline
                9082365
                wrote on last edited by
                #31

                That seems like a lot of work. Can I not just put the ball on a piece of concrete and wait?

                K 1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • B BillWoodruff

                  I've always had my doubts since I was wee tad and heard my parents talking, and my father saying: "but, where did he come from ?:" [^]

                  «To kill an error's as good a service, sometimes better than, establishing new truth or fact.» Charles Darwin in "Prospero's Precepts"

                  9 Offline
                  9 Offline
                  9082365
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #32

                  So that's why I can't see my reflection in a mirror?

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • R Rui_Dias

                    Odds are not applicable once an experiment's outcome is known/becomes a fact. Whoever did that poster wasted his (or her) time and made other waste theirs (including mine!) Be happy.

                    9 Offline
                    9 Offline
                    9082365
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #33

                    Quote:

                    Odds are not applicable

                    Indeed. Everything evens out in the end!

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • B BillWoodruff

                      I've always had my doubts since I was wee tad and heard my parents talking, and my father saying: "but, where did he come from ?:" [^]

                      «To kill an error's as good a service, sometimes better than, establishing new truth or fact.» Charles Darwin in "Prospero's Precepts"

                      I Offline
                      I Offline
                      iacopovettori
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #34

                      The real mess comes when you ask to yourself why on the Earth I am entitled to perceive subjectively just that particular human being that was born in those particular circumstances... or even better: the fact that in the whole world existed some very particular circumstances (whatever they were) capable to make "me" feel subjectively "alive". People that realize that this is the real problem may be interested to what I wrote at http://www.iacopovettori.it/laterzaipotesi/eng/ArgumentsProOI.aspx (with some discussions also with professional philosophers).

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      • 9 9082365

                        That seems like a lot of work. Can I not just put the ball on a piece of concrete and wait?

                        K Offline
                        K Offline
                        Kenneth Haugland
                        wrote on last edited by
                        #35

                        :laugh: :thumbsup:

                        1 Reply Last reply
                        0
                        • B BillWoodruff

                          I've always had my doubts since I was wee tad and heard my parents talking, and my father saying: "but, where did he come from ?:" [^]

                          «To kill an error's as good a service, sometimes better than, establishing new truth or fact.» Charles Darwin in "Prospero's Precepts"

                          T Offline
                          T Offline
                          ttennebb
                          wrote on last edited by
                          #36

                          In the grand scheme of the universe, I do not exist even though I am answering this silly question. No probability about it.

                          1 Reply Last reply
                          0
                          • D Daniel Pfeffer

                            Like many before him, the author is confusing pre-hoc and post-hoc statistics. For example: The probability of a couple having four children, all sons, is 1 in 16. Given that they have three sons, the probability of them having a fourth is 1 in 2. In like manner: Given my remote ancestor, the probability of my future existence is very small. Given that I already exist (Cogito, ergo sum), the probability of my existence is 100%.

                            If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack. --Winston Churchill

                            T Offline
                            T Offline
                            TNCaver
                            wrote on last edited by
                            #37

                            The original image was published on a Harvard Law blog, so one can perhaps understand the lack of statistical expertise of the blogger.

                            If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP.

                            1 Reply Last reply
                            0
                            Reply
                            • Reply as topic
                            Log in to reply
                            • Oldest to Newest
                            • Newest to Oldest
                            • Most Votes


                            • Login

                            • Don't have an account? Register

                            • Login or register to search.
                            • First post
                              Last post
                            0
                            • Categories
                            • Recent
                            • Tags
                            • Popular
                            • World
                            • Users
                            • Groups