Skip to content
  • Categories
  • Recent
  • Tags
  • Popular
  • World
  • Users
  • Groups
Skins
  • Light
  • Cerulean
  • Cosmo
  • Flatly
  • Journal
  • Litera
  • Lumen
  • Lux
  • Materia
  • Minty
  • Morph
  • Pulse
  • Sandstone
  • Simplex
  • Sketchy
  • Spacelab
  • United
  • Yeti
  • Zephyr
  • Dark
  • Cyborg
  • Darkly
  • Quartz
  • Slate
  • Solar
  • Superhero
  • Vapor

  • Default (No Skin)
  • No Skin
Collapse
Code Project
  1. Home
  2. The Lounge
  3. Proof of the astronomical probability that You do not exist !

Proof of the astronomical probability that You do not exist !

Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved The Lounge
csharpcomsecurityhelpquestion
37 Posts 18 Posters 0 Views 1 Watching
  • Oldest to Newest
  • Newest to Oldest
  • Most Votes
Reply
  • Reply as topic
Log in to reply
This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
  • M Mark_Wallace

    You obviously go to different casinos than those I've visited.

    I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

    M Offline
    M Offline
    Member 10707677
    wrote on last edited by
    #28

    I usually go to casinos to visit my money.

    The difficult may take time, the impossible a little longer.

    1 Reply Last reply
    0
    • M Mark_Wallace

      You're right. Elegance is simplicity.

      I wanna be a eunuchs developer! Pass me a bread knife!

      A Offline
      A Offline
      AXAMLMAN
      wrote on last edited by
      #29

      And Simplicity is Elegant.

      1 Reply Last reply
      0
      • B BillWoodruff

        I've always had my doubts since I was wee tad and heard my parents talking, and my father saying: "but, where did he come from ?:" [^]

        «To kill an error's as good a service, sometimes better than, establishing new truth or fact.» Charles Darwin in "Prospero's Precepts"

        R Offline
        R Offline
        Rui_Dias
        wrote on last edited by
        #30

        Odds are not applicable once an experiment's outcome is known/becomes a fact. Whoever did that poster wasted his (or her) time and made other waste theirs (including mine!) Be happy.

        9 1 Reply Last reply
        0
        • K Kenneth Haugland

          I'm not entirely sure what the meaning of the words are, as per usual in these theorems. But it was said of QM that if you hit a tennis ball and infinite number of times on a wall it will at one point just pass through the wall. The theorem seem to say that QM can influence the result in any way? :doh:

          9 Offline
          9 Offline
          9082365
          wrote on last edited by
          #31

          That seems like a lot of work. Can I not just put the ball on a piece of concrete and wait?

          K 1 Reply Last reply
          0
          • B BillWoodruff

            I've always had my doubts since I was wee tad and heard my parents talking, and my father saying: "but, where did he come from ?:" [^]

            «To kill an error's as good a service, sometimes better than, establishing new truth or fact.» Charles Darwin in "Prospero's Precepts"

            9 Offline
            9 Offline
            9082365
            wrote on last edited by
            #32

            So that's why I can't see my reflection in a mirror?

            1 Reply Last reply
            0
            • R Rui_Dias

              Odds are not applicable once an experiment's outcome is known/becomes a fact. Whoever did that poster wasted his (or her) time and made other waste theirs (including mine!) Be happy.

              9 Offline
              9 Offline
              9082365
              wrote on last edited by
              #33

              Quote:

              Odds are not applicable

              Indeed. Everything evens out in the end!

              1 Reply Last reply
              0
              • B BillWoodruff

                I've always had my doubts since I was wee tad and heard my parents talking, and my father saying: "but, where did he come from ?:" [^]

                «To kill an error's as good a service, sometimes better than, establishing new truth or fact.» Charles Darwin in "Prospero's Precepts"

                I Offline
                I Offline
                iacopovettori
                wrote on last edited by
                #34

                The real mess comes when you ask to yourself why on the Earth I am entitled to perceive subjectively just that particular human being that was born in those particular circumstances... or even better: the fact that in the whole world existed some very particular circumstances (whatever they were) capable to make "me" feel subjectively "alive". People that realize that this is the real problem may be interested to what I wrote at http://www.iacopovettori.it/laterzaipotesi/eng/ArgumentsProOI.aspx (with some discussions also with professional philosophers).

                1 Reply Last reply
                0
                • 9 9082365

                  That seems like a lot of work. Can I not just put the ball on a piece of concrete and wait?

                  K Offline
                  K Offline
                  Kenneth Haugland
                  wrote on last edited by
                  #35

                  :laugh: :thumbsup:

                  1 Reply Last reply
                  0
                  • B BillWoodruff

                    I've always had my doubts since I was wee tad and heard my parents talking, and my father saying: "but, where did he come from ?:" [^]

                    «To kill an error's as good a service, sometimes better than, establishing new truth or fact.» Charles Darwin in "Prospero's Precepts"

                    T Offline
                    T Offline
                    ttennebb
                    wrote on last edited by
                    #36

                    In the grand scheme of the universe, I do not exist even though I am answering this silly question. No probability about it.

                    1 Reply Last reply
                    0
                    • D Daniel Pfeffer

                      Like many before him, the author is confusing pre-hoc and post-hoc statistics. For example: The probability of a couple having four children, all sons, is 1 in 16. Given that they have three sons, the probability of them having a fourth is 1 in 2. In like manner: Given my remote ancestor, the probability of my future existence is very small. Given that I already exist (Cogito, ergo sum), the probability of my existence is 100%.

                      If you have an important point to make, don't try to be subtle or clever. Use a pile driver. Hit the point once. Then come back and hit it again. Then hit it a third time - a tremendous whack. --Winston Churchill

                      T Offline
                      T Offline
                      TNCaver
                      wrote on last edited by
                      #37

                      The original image was published on a Harvard Law blog, so one can perhaps understand the lack of statistical expertise of the blogger.

                      If you think 'goto' is evil, try writing an Assembly program without JMP.

                      1 Reply Last reply
                      0
                      Reply
                      • Reply as topic
                      Log in to reply
                      • Oldest to Newest
                      • Newest to Oldest
                      • Most Votes


                      • Login

                      • Don't have an account? Register

                      • Login or register to search.
                      • First post
                        Last post
                      0
                      • Categories
                      • Recent
                      • Tags
                      • Popular
                      • World
                      • Users
                      • Groups