Assault weapons

Pualee

Per your OP, the agenda is to ban assault weapons, while keeping the Constitution "in tact" through ownership of non "assault weapons". You have redefined what "arms" are, by implying it a right to own guns (which is in your second post).

HobbyProggy

Just know this passage of a song, have no idea how it sounds though :laugh:

Rules for the FOSW ![^]

if(!string.IsNullOrWhiteSpace(_signature))
{
MessageBox.Show("This is my signature: " + Environment.NewLine + _signature);
}
else
{
MessageBox.Show("404-Signature not found");
}

ZurdoDev

Pualee wrote:

You have redefined what "arms" are,

I think you are looking at this too hard.

Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it. Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.

realJSOP

RJOberg wrote:

Can't buy one, however you can still inherit unless I'm mistaken

You are mistaken. For transfers of Class III devices, He had to pass the background check to take possession, and pay a "tax". And even though he has it, there's probably few, if any, places he can even legally shoot it. None of my local ranges allow fully automatic weapons fire.

".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

RJOberg

So, you can inherit if you pass a check and pay the fairly low stamp fee/tax. Not without a hoop or two but certainly possible.

John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

None of my local ranges allow fully automatic weapons fire.

I think Vegas is closer for you, but I've one about 30 minutes away in WI which allows it, even has a few for rent.

realJSOP

Dem Rep. Himes: Nobody Wants To Take Away Guns, We Just Want To Be Like Australia, Canada & Great Britain | Video | RealClearPolitics[^] I don't really have time to google any more, the references are out there.

".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

Le centriste

John Simmons / outlaw programmer wrote:

I don't really have time to google any more, the references are out there.

I tried, but cannot find a reference to a mainstream group (or call them whatever) that advocate the complete repeal of 2nd amendment. And you did not convince me that gun control is about repealing the 2nd amendment or take away your gun. Obama (your favorite politician) has clearly stated it. [Here is the video](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6imFvSua3Kg) but you probably won't watch it.

Lost User

There's just one slight problem with that assumption. How do you define a weapon as an assault weapon? It's a very general term. One way is to ban high capacity magazines. OK, what defines the capacity? I have a .22 rifle that has a 7 shot magazine; a varmint gun. Is it an assault weapon? The term assault weapon was coined by people who are ignorant of guns. An AR-15 is a .223 caliber weapon with high velocity. A .45 ACP carbine is a much larger round with a lower velocity. Which is more dangerous? Which would be deemed as an assault weapon? Is it automatic weapons or semi-automatic? AR-15's are semi-automatic. The bottom line is that anything, ie. baseball bat, can also be covered under the definition of assault weapon just like knives, hammers, and anything else you can attack someone with. You can't solve a problem by treating the system. You have to go to the source of the problem. What cause the shooter to kill all of those kids?

When you are dead, you won't even know that you are dead. It's a pain only felt by others. Same thing when you are stupid.

ZurdoDev

Donathan.Hutchings wrote:

There's just one slight problem with that assumption. How do you define a weapon as an assault weapon? It's a very general term. One way is to ban high capacity magazines. OK, what defines the capacity? I have a .22 rifle that has a 7 shot magazine; a varmint gun. Is it an assault weapon? The term assault weapon was coined by people who are ignorant of guns. An AR-15 is a .223 caliber weapon with high velocity. A .45 ACP carbine is a much larger round with a lower velocity. Which is more dangerous? Which would be deemed as an assault weapon? Is it automatic weapons or semi-automatic? AR-15's are semi-automatic.

This feel like an attempt at avoiding the issue and muddying the water. It is very clear that some guns are only intended to kill other people. How about starting with that.

Donathan.Hutchings wrote:

The bottom line is that anything, ie. baseball bat, can also be covered under the definition of assault weapon just like knives, hammers, and anything else you can attack someone with

You can't seriously compare what happened in Florida recently with a baseball bat. :doh: :wtf:

Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it. Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.

realJSOP

Passing the check for a class III weapon is more stringent - there's more paperwork to do, and the background check takes much longer. My point was that unlike non-Class III weapons, you can't simply inherit a machine gun without involving the government.

".45 ACP - because shooting twice is just silly" - JSOP, 2010
-----
You can never have too much ammo - unless you're swimming, or on fire. - JSOP, 2010
-----
When you pry the gun from my cold dead hands, be careful - the barrel will be very hot. - JSOP, 2013

dlhale

"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." The 2nd amendment is specifically about military style weapons. You go hunting with a gun, you go to war with arms. And militias go to war not hunting. And tell me, what article of the constitution gives the federal government the power to regulate guns or arms? I'll tell you, THERE ISN'T ONE, and the 2nd amendment expressly prohibits it.

ZurdoDev

dlhale wrote:

about military style weapons.

Then based on your argument we should be all stocking up on jets, tanks, and drones, not wimpy little assault rifles.

dlhale wrote:

I'll tell you, THERE ISN'T ONE, and the 2nd amendment expressly prohibits it.

Thank you Captain Obvious. :rolleyes: :doh:

Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it. Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.

jschell

F-ES Sitecore wrote:

We had laws that allowed people to own guns. What's the difference?

Err...actually quite a bit. It requires much more to amend the constitution. Even presuming such super support existed it would also take a long time as well.

jschell

Pualee wrote:

Not own guns... but rather bear arms. Consider the difference between a gun (sporting/hunting) and arms (military weapons).

No rather you are redefining it to yours. What was the difference when the Constitution was created? They were talking about the most up to date weapons that existed then. And that included the private ownership of cannons and gunships. Yes, Privateers Mattered | U.S. Naval Institute[^]

jschell

den2k88 wrote:

Define an assault weapon.

Go into a store that sells a large selection. Ask for a recommendation for an assault weapon that one can own legally. They will be more than happy to provide a large choice of options for you to considered. However that is only what they carry so you might want to shop around. Also buy some magazines. You should be able to find a number that either are specifically about assault weapons or carry articles on them.

GenJerDan

‭011111100010‬ wrote:

Then based on your argument we should be all stocking up on jets, tanks, and drones, not wimpy little assault rifles.

It was expected by the framers. The government could (maybe still can?) issue Letters of Marque to civilian owners of vessels, authorizing them to fight the enemy. The civilians were expected to already have, or get, all the materiel neccesary: cannons, powder, ammunition, etc. So, yeah, "military" arms in civilian hands was a thing until recently.

We won't sit down. We won't shut up. We won't go quietly away. YouTube, VidMe and My Mu[sic], Films and Windows Programs, etc. and FB

ZurdoDev

GenJerDan wrote:

So, yeah, "military" arms in civilian hands was a thing until recently.

How many tanks do you have? What about stealth bombers? Can I borrow one? :laugh: :laugh:

Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it. Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.

GenJerDan

Stealth is way too expensive for me, as are tanks. Other people do have tanks, though. :p

We won't sit down. We won't shut up. We won't go quietly away. YouTube, VidMe and My Mu[sic], Films and Windows Programs, etc. and FB

ZurdoDev

GenJerDan wrote:

as are tanks.

Well, little good your signature quote will do when you don't have your own tank. :laugh:

Everyone is born right handed. Only the strongest overcome it. Fight for left-handed rights and hand equality.

David Crow

F-ES Sitecore wrote:

So there was no ignorance in my post

Didn't you say "...constitutions can't be amended so the second amendment can't ever be undone" or are you referring to a different post (where you are agreeing with John)?

"One man's wage rise is another man's price increase." - Harold Wilson

"Fireproof doesn't mean the fire will never come. It means when the fire comes that you will be able to withstand it." - Michael Simmons

"You can easily judge the character of a man by how he treats those who can do nothing for him." - James D. Miles